Apple opposes Canadian bill C-22 on encryption

In Short:
– Apple opposes Bill C-22, fearing it could weaken device encryption and user privacy.
– Tech companies warn that legislation may compromise security while attempting to aid law enforcement investigations.

Apple has voiced strong opposition to a proposed Canadian bill that could potentially compel the company to compromise the encryption of its devices.The bill, C-22, is currently under debate in the House of Commons and has been brought forth by Canada’s ruling Liberal Party.

The proposal aims to assist law enforcement in investigating security threats more effectively.

Tech companies caution that such legislative measures could weaken user security by expanding lawful access to encrypted data.

The bill may contain elements akin to a data access provision order issued to Apple last year in the UK.

This prompted Apple to revoke a feature that allowed end-to-end encryption for user data stored in its cloud.

Officials from the U.S. later indicated that Britain had rescinded the request following concerns raised about potential treaty violations.

End-to-end encryption ensures that only users can access their data, providing significant protection against unauthorized access.

In a statement, Apple expressed that Bill C-22 could diminish the privacy and security enhancements users expect.

The company firmly stated that it would never incorporate backdoors that compromise their encryption standards.

Executives from Meta Platforms are also expected to testify regarding the bill.

Public Safety Canada and the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence have not commented on the matter.

The gov't says that Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, is "encryption neutral." Canadians aren't "encryption neutral." The UK gov't used the same powers to secretly order Apple to remove iCloud security for everyone. We need guardrails. pic.twitter.com/LVAhWsrJc9

— David T.S. Fraser (@privacylawyer) May 6, 2026

 

Encryption concerns

The ongoing debate highlights tensions between security measures and consumer privacy.

Law enforcement agencies argue that access to encrypted data is crucial for maintaining public safety.

Skeptics emphasize that weakening encryption could expose users to greater risks from cybercriminals and hackers.

Each side presents contrasting views on how best to balance security and privacy in the digital age.