The message from US President Joe Biden sent shudders through Wall Street and then financial markets around the world – “Beware of Hong Kong.”
Thousands of American companies have looked to Hong Kong as a footstep into the Chinese market. Even CNN has its main Asia/Pacific operations there.
Over recent years, media companies, including Australia’s ABC and Nine newspapers have found their journalists in trouble for stepping foot in China.
THE FUTURE OF HONG KONG
Now, in executive offices across Manhattan, the reality is starting to bite. The question is – how much longer will Hong Kong be a safe place for western companies to do business?
And for the people of Hong Kong – what happens next?
As China tightens its grip on the territory’s legal and financial systems, what will that mean for their long-held ambitions for expanding in the world’s second-largest economy and its market of 1.4 billion people?
Antigovernment protesters, Hong Kong, August 2019
A NEW WAY OF LIFE
Banks are now used to the shifting landscape in Hong Kong. While Hong Kong has felt like an extension of London or New York, tensions have flared between Beijing as western countries. The 50 year deal signed between the UK and China during the landmark handover has almost been thrown out.
For banks, the city isn’t just a staging area to China, but also a valuable market in itself.
Joe Biden’s warning was less about the new reality for Hong Kong, but more about the ongoing battle between China and the US for global supremacy. In this race, it seems, there can only be one winner.
For many companies in western countries, the China conundrum focuses on theyr reliance on trade, tourism and local customs. But for others, their presence in Hong Kong is no longer a safe bet. Many companies are looking to Seoul or Singapore as a potential new Asian headquarters.
An aerial view shows buildings from the Mid-Levels district of Hong Kong on May 25, 2021. (Photo by Peter PARKS / AFP)
HING KONG RESPONDS
Hong Kong has hit out at the US President.
Biden’s advisory is “totally ridiculous and unfounded fear-mongering,” a spokesman for the territory said in a statement. “The main victims of this latest fallout will sadly be those U.S. businesses and U.S. citizens who have taken Hong Kong as their home.”
The United States imposed sanctions on seven Chinese officials over Beijing’s crackdown on democracy in Hong Kong, Washington’s latest effort to hold China accountable for what it calls an erosion of rule of law in the former British colony.
A spokesperson for the Commissioner of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hong Kong in a statement late on Friday strongly condemned the U.S. actions, saying they were blatant interference in Hong Kong and China’s internal affairs.
“(U.S.) worries about Hong Kong’s business environment is fake; its attempt to destroy Hong Kong’s prosperity and stability, endanger China’s national security, and hamper China’s development is real,” he said in the statement.
A Hong Kong government spokesman says Washington has repeatedly attempted to slander the legislation over the last year.
Cyber security evolution prompts redefinition of critical infrastructure in Asia Pacific amid rising digital threats.
In Short:
– Cyber security incidents in Asia Pacific redefine critical infrastructure, expanding its scope beyond just industrial machinery.
– New strategies emphasise visibility to protect crucial sectors like banking, finance, and telecommunications from cyber threats.
The rise in cyber security incidents in Asia Pacific is reshaping the definition and protection of critical infrastructure. New digital and operational technology risks are prompting stakeholders to reconsider conventional beliefs that critical infrastructure is primarily industrial machinery behind high fences.
Michael Fisher from Garland Technology discusses this evolving landscape. Critical infrastructure now encompasses essential services such as banking, finance, and telecommunications, expanding beyond traditional definitions.
The convergence of IT and operational technology (OT) networks increases cyber security risks. Many OT services were not designed with cyber security in mind, leaving them vulnerable to cyber attacks. Industries most at risk include telecommunications, banking, finance, and utilities, where any disruption can significantly impact society.
Increased Visibility
Fisher highlights that traditional cyber security alone is insufficient to secure these infrastructures. Effective protection requires a new approach focused on visibility. Garland Technology’s mission is to provide visibility to upstream cyber security platforms, eliminating blind spots.
Governments and businesses must recognise their roles in combatting cyber threats. Australia’s Security of Critical Infrastructure Act is a step towards increasing corporate responsibility in recognising critical infrastructure and ensuring compliance with security measures.
In Short:
– Trump gives Hamas three to four days to accept a U.S.-backed Gaza peace plan, warning of consequences.
– Hamas calls the plan biased and insists on a complete Israeli withdrawal before considering any agreement.
U.S. President Donald Trump has given Hamas three to four days to accept a U.S.-backed peace plan for Gaza, warning of severe consequences if they reject it.The plan, shared by mediators Qatar and Egypt, emerged after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu endorsed it during a visit to the White House. Hamas, which was not part of the talks, is expected to review the proposal that calls for disarmament, a previously rejected demand.
Trump stated that support for the plan came from both Israeli and Arab leaders, and he emphasised the need for Hamas to respond promptly. The proposal includes a ceasefire, hostage exchanges, an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, and disarmament of Hamas, along with a transitional government.
A Hamas source described the plan as biased towards Israel and containing unacceptable conditions.
The group maintains that a complete Israeli withdrawal is a prerequisite for their agreement to any deal, while they are unwilling to disarm.
Pressure Mounts
Hamas faces significant pressure as foreign ministers from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the UAE, Qatar, and Egypt have supported the initiative. Turkey’s intelligence head is also set to join discussions in Doha, marking a new level of mediation.
Despite expressing initial support, Netanyahu is cautious about the plan’s implications for Palestinian statehood and faces pressure from his coalition. Public sentiment in Gaza reflects a desire for peace, albeit with scepticism about the sincerity of both Trump and Netanyahu’s commitments.