Queen Elizabeth II was notably one of the most respected figures in the world, and now the monarchy fights for survival
Queen Elizabeth II was the most private, public figure. Her Majesty was a constant thread in millions of lives. A symbol of continuity for seven decades.
Undoubtedly, the Queen’s global impact will be hard to match.
As her reign fuelled widespread revolution that altered the very landscape of the nation.
Politically, culturally and technologically, the Queen’s leadership was unwavering, and her wish was for this lead to stand the test of time.
History shows, the royal family is not immune from life’s challenges and controversies.
But through turbulent times, the Queens poise, strength and class always prevailed.
Above everything else, she was a constant. The ever-reliable presence holding the royal family together.
Contributor Cei Dewar, was lucky enough to meet the Queen and says millions around the world are mourning her loss, and everything she represents.
Monarchy fights for survival
As the world waves goodbye to Her Majesty, the monarchy fights for survival, finding its way forward without Queen Elizabeth II.
King Charles III is at the reigns, inheriting the lead on what the royal family becomes.
The King is taking the reign on a very different world.
He will be exposed to public scrutiny like never before, the internet phenomenon, and a world where Republicans are on the rise.
However, His Majesty has expressed his determination to focus on diversity, climate change action and maintain the institutions relevance on the global diplomatic stage.
King Charles’ tumultuous personal life was often the downfall of his popularity, but now, he has pledged his life to serve as King.
Charles’ reputation slipped after the death of Diana, and ever since he has worked to build his popularity.
But solidarity within his own family will be the key driver of success.
Notably, Prince William and Harry have already showed their reconciled solidarity. Standing side by side, reunited in grief.
Their relationship will be paramount to conserving the monarchy.
While the future of the monarchy hangs in the balance, it will be difficult for King Charles the III to fill the shoes of his late mother. As well as connect with the national psyche and be a reassuring presence.
Most people don’t know a world without Queen Elizabeth II, and although saying goodbye is heartbreaking, a new reign now begins.
Perhaps, the rise of Charles to the throne will be the injection of change the royal family needs to last beyond the 21st century.
A big job lies ahead. For now, the world has his pledge and actions will speak for themselves.
Charles the King, a role he has been waiting for his entire life.
Rupert Murdoch’s attempt to change the family trust to consolidate control under his son Lachlan has been rejected by a Nevada commissioner.
The ruling, made by Commissioner Edmund J. Gorman Jr., stated that Murdoch and Lachlan acted in “bad faith” while trying to amend the irrevocable trust, which divides control equally among Murdoch’s four oldest children.
The 96-page opinion characterised the plan as a “carefully crafted charade” intended to secure Lachlan’s executive roles unconditionally.
Murdoch’s lawyer expressed disappointment and plans to appeal the ruling.
FILE PHOTO: Media mogul Rupert Murdoch poses for a photograph with his sons Lachlan and James in London.
Media empire
This dispute is critical as it affects the future control of Murdoch’s media empire, which includes Fox News and other major outlets.
While the intention was not to diminish financial stakes, the ruling reflects deep family tensions, especially given differing political views among the siblings.
The commissioner noted Lachlan initiated the proposed changes, created a plan dubbed “Project Family Harmony,” and labeled James as a “troublesome beneficiary.”
Despite Lachlan and Rupert’s efforts, the attempt to marginalise James was deemed insufficiently justified by the court.
Murdoch’s family trust, established in 2006, retains his control until his death, and includes provisions allowing amendments.
However, the commissioner found that Murdoch and Lachlan’s actions were not supporting their siblings’ best interests.
The ruling is not final and may be contested further in court.
Syrian rebels ousted Bashar Assad after a 13-year civil war, prompting a shift in the region’s dynamics that presents risks and opportunities for the US.
President Biden acknowledged Assad’s removal as a historic opportunity, signaling the need for careful US engagement to avoid chaos in Syria.
Experts highlight this change as a chance to weaken Iran’s regional influence, as the overthrow of Assad hinders Iran’s strategic interests.
The US has had limited involvement in Syria, focusing mainly on combating ISIS, which complicates its response to the new power vacuum.
Did Iraq become a flourishing democracy post-Saddam. How about Afghanistan post-Taliban. How about Libya post-Gaddafi. I’m sure Syria post-Assad will be a successful regime change operation.
20 straight years of this stuff and people still don’t get it.
Expectations suggest a low-level US campaign against ISIS will continue until a stable government is established, with efforts to maintain order and support allies.
The end of Assad’s rule has opened a security vacuum that extremist groups may exploit, further jeopardizing the humanitarian situation.
Iran and Russia also seek to reassert their influence following Assad’s departure, which could lead to competition for power among various factions.
Key figures, including the leader of Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham, Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, may vie for control in the power vacuum, raising concerns given the group’s past affiliations with terrorism.
Washington faces the challenge of engaging with groups like HTS while avoiding further destabilization.
ByteDance and TikTok have requested a temporary court order to block a U.S. law requiring ByteDance to divest TikTok by January 19.
They filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
The companies warned that the law would shut down TikTok, affecting over 170 million U.S. users.
Without this injunction, TikTok faces a possible ban in six weeks, significantly diminishing its value and hurting businesses reliant on the app.
A three-judge panel recently upheld the law, mandating the divestiture.
The companies argue the likelihood of a Supreme Court reversal justifies a pause for further deliberation.
Additional time
They also pointed to President-elect Donald Trump’s opposition to a ban, suggesting additional time could help resolve the issue without Supreme Court intervention.
The Justice Department has indicated the appeals court should deny the request promptly for a timely Supreme Court review.
TikTok requested a decision by December 16, noting that the next actions depend on President Biden, who could extend the deadline, and Trump, who assumes office on January 20.
The feasibility of ByteDance demonstrating significant progress on divestiture remains uncertain.
Trump’s incoming national security adviser expressed his commitment to protecting user access to TikTok while ensuring data security.