Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

Tech

Texas takes Meta to court over face ID collection data

Published

on

The Texas attorney general is suing Facebook parent Meta claiming it is breaching laws relating to biometric data

Texas attorney general Ken Paxton says the U.S-based tech company has unlawfully collected biometric data of the people of Texas to use for commercial purposes, without their informed consent.

The lawsuit, filed Monday in state district court, claimed Meta has been “storing millions of biometric identifiers” — identified as retina or iris scans, voiceprints, or a record of hand and face geometry — as well as data contained in photos and videos people upload to its services, including Facebook and Instagram.

“Facebook will no longer take advantage of people and their children with the intent to turn a profit at the expense of one’s safety and well-being,”

PAXTON SAID IN A STATEMENT.

Mr Paxton has been going up against America’s biggest tech giants for some time. He earlier launched an investigation of Twitter over its ban of former President Donald Trump.

He has also filed several lawsuits against search engine, Google.

“This is yet another example of Big Tech’s deceitful business practices and it must stop. I will continue to fight for Texans’ privacy and security.”

PAXTON SAID IN A STATEMENT.

The filing of the lawsuit coincided with the first day of early voting in a primary election in Texas, where Paxton faces several GOP challengers in the wake of his top deputies reporting him to the FBI for alleged corruption.

What law has Meta broken?

Under a law imposed in the US state of Texas, companies must obtain “informed consent” from people to use their biometric data.

This means people have to be informed prior to their data being captured and it can only be done if they agree to it.

Such data also cannot be disclosed for anyone else, although there are some exceptions, such as law enforcement subpoenas.

Meta’s response:

In a statement, Meta, which is based at 1 Hacker Way, Melo Park, California, called the lawsuit “without merit”.

Meta stated back in November that it was shutting down its facial recognition programme and deleting its data.

Continue Reading

Leaders

OpenAI rejects Musk’s $97.4 billion takeover bid

OpenAI’s Sam Altman rejects Musk’s $97.4 billion bid, calling it competitive, as tensions rise with conflicting interests.

Published

on

OpenAI’s Sam Altman rejects Musk’s $97.4 billion bid, calling it competitive, as tensions rise with conflicting interests.

In Short

OpenAI has rejected Elon Musk’s $97.4 billion takeover bid, viewing it as a competitive strategy. The company’s CEO, Sam Altman, and its board members, including Bret Taylor, have ongoing rivalries with Musk amid broader industry dynamics.

OpenAI has officially rejected Elon Musk’s $97.4 billion takeover bid.

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, described Musk’s offer as a competitive strategy rather than a genuine acquisition attempt.

The board of OpenAI, which manages both its nonprofit and for-profit sectors, has not received any formal communication regarding the bid from Musk.

Currently, OpenAI is in the process of raising a funding round that could elevate its valuation to $300 billion, nearly double its previous worth.

A notable point of contention arises from Bret Taylor, former chairman of Twitter, who now oversees OpenAI’s board and has previously had disagreements with Musk over the Twitter acquisition.

In response to the takeover bid, Altman light-heartedly remarked on social media: “No thank you, but we’ll buy Twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.”

This exchange highlights ongoing rivalries in the tech sector and the strategic manoeuvres of influential figures like Musk and Altman.

As the landscape continues to evolve, it remains to be seen how these developments will impact both OpenAI and Musk’s future endeavours.

Continue Reading

Leaders

Rising Ticketmaster scams: how to protect yourself from fraud

Rising cyber scams target Ticketmaster users, exploiting emotional connections; experts advise on protective measures against fraud.

Published

on

Rising cyber scams target Ticketmaster users and exploiting emotional connections.

In Short

Cyber scams targeting Ticketmaster users are on the rise, exploiting emotions and rushing fans into poor decisions. To avoid falling victim, individuals should verify offers, access official websites, and enhance security with measures like two-factor authentication.

Cyber scams targeting Ticketmaster users are increasing, causing significant vulnerability to fraud.

The rise of these scams is linked to three vulnerabilities: emotional connections to performances, reliance on digital platforms, and ease of access to scams.

Scammers exploit the fear of missing out (FOMO), particularly during high-demand events like Taylor Swift’s concerts.

Fans often rush into purchasing tickets without verifying the legitimacy of the offers, leading to poor decision-making.

If someone falls victim to a scam, their recourse is limited, often relying on Ticketmaster or other platforms for support.

Many fraudulent websites mimic legitimate ticket sellers, tricking users into entering personal information.

To avoid falling for scams, individuals should take their time, scrutinise offers, and ensure they access official websites directly.

Steve Tcherchian, Chief Product Officer and Chief Information Security Officer at XYPRO joins to discuss how to counter these cyber attacks.

Implementing two-factor authentication on ticketing platforms provides an additional layer of security.

While there are no guarantees to stop scams, ticket platforms must enhance their security measures.

Issues with customer service and support during scams can exacerbate the situation for victims.

Continue Reading

Leaders

Australia’s workforce revolution sets the stage for a four-day work week

Australia’s AI Workforce Revolution: Automation Paves the Way for a Four-Day Work Week and New Job Redesigns.

Published

on

Australia’s AI workforce revolution: automation paves the way for a four-day work week.

In Short

UiPath’s report highlights the rapid shift towards “agentic automation,” where AI makes autonomous decisions, encouraging businesses to reassess roles and harness automation for productivity. This evolution may enable a four-day work week and necessitates the retraining of staff while ensuring regulations are in place for trust and compliance with AI integration.

The trend towards work reallocation is rapidly advancing, with UiPath’s new report identifying significant shifts in AI and automation.

Key insights from the report suggest a move towards “agentic automation,” where AI begins to make autonomous decisions. Yelena GalstianHead of Solutions and Customer Advisory at UiPath shares her key insights.

Organisations are encouraged to reassess existing roles and identify areas where automation can enhance productivity.

A critical aspect will be the orchestration of collaboration between human employees, AI agents, and software robots to ensure effective teamwork.

Looking ahead, the motto for businesses is to “redesign and reassign” processes while considering how AI can handle repetitive tasks, allowing human employees to focus on more complex responsibilities.

As organisations embrace these changes, we could see a potential transition to a four-day work week, made feasible through increased efficiency and productivity from AI.

For further insights into the research and methodologies for implementing AI in business, interested parties can connect with the UiPath team through their website.

Continue Reading

Trending Now