When U.S. President Joe Biden said Russia will invade Ukraine on 19 January, he was playing a tight game of diplomatic chess
The President cautioned his Russian counterpart, saying that President Vladimir Putin “will regret having done it”.
It was a somewhat bold move for Mr Biden, who is trying to reassert the U.S.’ dominance in foreign policy following President Donald Trump’s tenure.
Russia has amassed around 100,000 troops along its border with Ukraine in recent months.
President Putin has put together several requests for the U.S. before he considers drawing his forces back.
These requests include a ban on Ukraine joining NATO, and for the North Atlantic Alliance to remove its troops across eastern Europe—areas that were formerly part of the Soviet Union.
What are the consequences?
The U.S. has been very clear: if Russia invades Ukraine, there will be “serious” personal sanctions against President Putin.
“There are going to be serious economic consequences if he moves.”
U.S. PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN
The U.S. President hasn’t minced his words. In fact, he believes “it would be the largest invasion since World War II”, and it would “change the world” if Russia entered its sovereign neighbour.
U.S. President Joe Biden speaks with European leaders in response to Russia’s military buildup.
The U.S. has put 8,5000 troops on alert amid fears of an invasion. Of course, armed forces are always on alert, so this may just be symbolic of the U.S.’ commitment to NATO.
But U.S. Republican Oz Sultan told Ticker NEWS the President has been “heavy fisted in his response”, to the escalating tensions.
“The challenge that you have is Russia has seen Ukraine joining NATO as a threat.”
REPUBLICAN OZ SULTAN
The European Commission is also on board. Ticker NEWS spoke with Peter Stano, who is the lead spokesperson for external affairs. He says “we are strongly united and determined to react to any further aggression with massive, massive measures that would have inflict a huge cost on the aggressor’s consequences.”
Russia recently responded to the U.S.’ stance on the issue. A spokesperson for Mr Putin, Dmitry Peskov, believes such sanctions would not be “painful” for the President.
He says the sanctions would be “politically destructive”.
Peter Stano believes military action is “outdated” in 21st Century Europe. Instead, he believes economic sanctions are the way forward.
Tensions in this part of the world are hardly new. In fact, conflict peaked in 2014 when protesters ousted Ukraine’s pro-Russian president, Viktor Yanukovych.
At the same time, Russia annexed Crimea—an area largely made up of ethnic Russians.
Then, Mr Putin moved to strike in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine. Over 14,000 people have lost their lives in the armed conflict.
How does Ukraine feel about this?
Between the U.S. and Russia—two of the world’s biggest superpowers, Ukraine feels like the forgotten child in this latest fiasco.
The nation is home to over 44 million people. A 2020 survey found 81 per cent of Ukrainians had a negative attitude of Mr Putin.
But its residents appear relatively calm at the moment.
Ukraine’s Foreign Minister does not think there are systems in place for a “full-scale offensive”.
Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba isn’t overly concerned about the number of troops on the border either. He says “their number is now insufficient for a large-scale offensive”.
“They are still missing some key military elements and systems to mount a big, full-scale offensive.”
UKRAINE’S FOREIGN MINISTER DMYTRO KULEBA
Russia, Ukraine, France and Germany met in Paris this week to discuss the conflict. There were no breakthroughs but the Normandy-style gathering agreed to meet again in two weeks.
What is Russia’s motivation behind this?
President Putin is afraid of democracy. The leader sensationally changed his nation’s constitution in 2020, which allows him to remain in power until 2036.
Mr Putin’s ‘buffer states’ mentality has granted Russia geographic separatism from the European Union in the West.
It’s the same reason why Mr Putin is scared of Opposition Leader Alexei Navalny, who was added to Russia’s ‘terrorist list’ this week.
“Nalvany’s one man with a small operation but that represents democracy to him and Putin is really afraid of democracy.”
Dr carol saivetz, harvard university
Russia has consistently denied any intention of invading Ukraine. It would be highly frowned upon by the international community if that promise was broken.
“They {Russia] know that the Ukraine Government is pushing hard for membership of NATO and that, in their view, would complete this extraordinary push of NATO’s membership from central Europe right across to Russia’s borders,” Professor Joseph Camilleri from La Trobe University says.
Professor Camilleri told Ticker NEWS he doesn’t think an incursion will occur. Instead, he believes Russia considers the U.S. as an “adversary that will never redeem itself”.
It could be a strategic gambit for Russia, or the nation could be playing with fire.
Why does the U.S. want to get involved?
It feels like Cold-War era power play is at the heart of this. So why does the U.S. want to get involved in another conflict on another continent?
The U.S. is a founding member of NATO, which contributes thousands of active personnel across Europe.
European NATO members are currently spending 2 per cent of GDP on defence by 2024. The U.S. has previously pushed for more under President Trump.
But unlike Mr Putin, the U.S. is a big supporter of democracy—something that was came to life at Mr Biden’s Summit for Democracy.
The U.S. wants to fight for democracy. President Biden describes it as “the defining challenge of our time”.
As such, the U.S. sees the Russia-Ukraine conflict as critical to meeting those objectives. Importantly, the U.S. has zero NATO obligations to Ukraine so it’s hard to imagine a large military presence on the ground fighting Russia.
With economic sanctions for Russia, and a red-faced U.S. all on the table. It appears like this conflict may end in checkmate sooner than expected.
Costa is a news producer at ticker NEWS. He has previously worked as a regional journalist at the Southern Highlands Express newspaper. He also has several years' experience in the fire and emergency services sector, where he has worked with researchers, policymakers and local communities. He has also worked at the Seven Network during their Olympic Games coverage and in the ABC Melbourne newsroom.
He also holds a Bachelor of Arts (Professional), with expertise in journalism, politics and international relations. His other interests include colonial legacies in the Pacific, counter-terrorism, aviation and travel.
Trump and Netanyahu unveil a Middle East peace plan; explore implications for hostages, ceasefire, and regional dynamics.
President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have unveiled a new plan to end the war in the Middle East. The announcement sets out an ambitious path that could reshape negotiations and redefine the region’s future.
In today’s episode, we explore what this plan means for hostages, the prospects for a ceasefire, and the risks of legitimising groups like Hamas. Rabbi Abraham Cooper of the Simon Wiesenthal Center joins us to break down the key messages and the global response.
Could this be a turning point, or just another failed attempt at peace? We look at the stakes for Jewish communities worldwide, the message it sends to other leaders in the region, and whether this moment rewards terrorism or sets a path for justice. Subscribe to never miss an episode of Ticker – https://www.youtube.com/@weareticker
In Short:
– Sean Combs sentenced to 50 months in prison for prostitution-related charges involving male escorts.
– Combs expressed remorse and plans to appeal the sentence, citing parental plea for leniency.
Sean “Diddy” Combs has been sentenced to over four years in prison following his conviction for prostitution-related charges.
The sentence of 50 months was handed down by U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian in Manhattan federal court. Combs, aged 55, was found guilty after a jury determined he arranged for male escorts to travel across state lines for drug-fueled sexual performances with his girlfriends.
Combs faced a maximum of 20 years but was acquitted of more severe charges, including racketeering, that could have led to a life sentence.
The allegations included claims that he coerced his girlfriends into participating in these encounters through threats and violence. Combs, who has been incarcerated since his 2024 arrest, is expected to appeal.
Emotional Statements
During the sentencing, Combs expressed remorse and stated he had learned his lesson. He acknowledged past abuses but maintained that the performances were consensual. His legal team argued for a reduced sentence of 14 months, citing his prior time served, while prosecutors advocated for a more extended sentence, highlighting the seriousness of the abuse.
Combs’ children also spoke during the proceedings, requesting leniency from the judge, stating that he had improved since his arrest. They pleaded for their father’s presence in their lives, with his daughter emotionally addressing the court.
The case has drawn significant media attention, marking Combs as a prominent figure facing serious charges in the entertainment industry.
In Short:
– Hamas is willing to release hostages but needs clarity on Trump’s peace plan.
– Negotiations continue, with Hamas requesting changes to disarmament and Israeli withdrawal terms.
Hamas has indicated a willingness to release the remaining hostages in Gaza, contingent on conditions linked to a broader peace agreement. The group’s response to mediators did not provide clarity on many aspects of President Trump’s 20-point peace plan.Hamas expressed gratitude for Trump’s peace efforts but sought specifics on issues like the timeline for Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and assurances regarding the cessation of hostilities.
Trump welcomed the dialogue, urging Israel to pause its military actions while negotiations progress, which may exceed the Sunday deadline he set for a deal.
The group has agreed to release all prisoners associated with the occupation as part of Trump’s exchange proposal. However, Hamas maintains that discussions on Gaza’s future and the rights of the Palestinian populations require an inclusive Palestinian framework.
Reports suggest that 20 of the 48 hostages are still alive. Senior Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzouk stated that the group needs further negotiations before committing fully to Trump’s plan and indicated that releasing the hostages in 72 hours is unrealistic.
Ongoing Negotiations
Trump’s peace initiative aims for the release of all hostages and proposes a transitional governance board for Gaza. While Hamas has shown some willingness to support the plan, it insists on modifications, particularly around disarmament and the withdrawal of Israeli forces.
Complexities within Hamas’s leadership further complicate consensus on the deal, as previous U.S. attempts to persuade the group have faltered.