When U.S. President Joe Biden said Russia will invade Ukraine on 19 January, he was playing a tight game of diplomatic chess
The President cautioned his Russian counterpart, saying that President Vladimir Putin “will regret having done it”.
It was a somewhat bold move for Mr Biden, who is trying to reassert the U.S.’ dominance in foreign policy following President Donald Trump’s tenure.
Russia has amassed around 100,000 troops along its border with Ukraine in recent months.
President Putin has put together several requests for the U.S. before he considers drawing his forces back.
These requests include a ban on Ukraine joining NATO, and for the North Atlantic Alliance to remove its troops across eastern Europe—areas that were formerly part of the Soviet Union.
What are the consequences?
The U.S. has been very clear: if Russia invades Ukraine, there will be “serious” personal sanctions against President Putin.
“There are going to be serious economic consequences if he moves.”
U.S. PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN
The U.S. President hasn’t minced his words. In fact, he believes “it would be the largest invasion since World War II”, and it would “change the world” if Russia entered its sovereign neighbour.
U.S. President Joe Biden speaks with European leaders in response to Russia’s military buildup.
The U.S. has put 8,5000 troops on alert amid fears of an invasion. Of course, armed forces are always on alert, so this may just be symbolic of the U.S.’ commitment to NATO.
But U.S. Republican Oz Sultan told Ticker NEWS the President has been “heavy fisted in his response”, to the escalating tensions.
“The challenge that you have is Russia has seen Ukraine joining NATO as a threat.”
REPUBLICAN OZ SULTAN
The European Commission is also on board. Ticker NEWS spoke with Peter Stano, who is the lead spokesperson for external affairs. He says “we are strongly united and determined to react to any further aggression with massive, massive measures that would have inflict a huge cost on the aggressor’s consequences.”
Russia recently responded to the U.S.’ stance on the issue. A spokesperson for Mr Putin, Dmitry Peskov, believes such sanctions would not be “painful” for the President.
He says the sanctions would be “politically destructive”.
Peter Stano believes military action is “outdated” in 21st Century Europe. Instead, he believes economic sanctions are the way forward.
Tensions in this part of the world are hardly new. In fact, conflict peaked in 2014 when protesters ousted Ukraine’s pro-Russian president, Viktor Yanukovych.
At the same time, Russia annexed Crimea—an area largely made up of ethnic Russians.
Then, Mr Putin moved to strike in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine. Over 14,000 people have lost their lives in the armed conflict.
How does Ukraine feel about this?
Between the U.S. and Russia—two of the world’s biggest superpowers, Ukraine feels like the forgotten child in this latest fiasco.
The nation is home to over 44 million people. A 2020 survey found 81 per cent of Ukrainians had a negative attitude of Mr Putin.
But its residents appear relatively calm at the moment.
Ukraine’s Foreign Minister does not think there are systems in place for a “full-scale offensive”.
Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba isn’t overly concerned about the number of troops on the border either. He says “their number is now insufficient for a large-scale offensive”.
“They are still missing some key military elements and systems to mount a big, full-scale offensive.”
UKRAINE’S FOREIGN MINISTER DMYTRO KULEBA
Russia, Ukraine, France and Germany met in Paris this week to discuss the conflict. There were no breakthroughs but the Normandy-style gathering agreed to meet again in two weeks.
What is Russia’s motivation behind this?
President Putin is afraid of democracy. The leader sensationally changed his nation’s constitution in 2020, which allows him to remain in power until 2036.
Mr Putin’s ‘buffer states’ mentality has granted Russia geographic separatism from the European Union in the West.
It’s the same reason why Mr Putin is scared of Opposition Leader Alexei Navalny, who was added to Russia’s ‘terrorist list’ this week.
“Nalvany’s one man with a small operation but that represents democracy to him and Putin is really afraid of democracy.”
Dr carol saivetz, harvard university
Russia has consistently denied any intention of invading Ukraine. It would be highly frowned upon by the international community if that promise was broken.
“They {Russia] know that the Ukraine Government is pushing hard for membership of NATO and that, in their view, would complete this extraordinary push of NATO’s membership from central Europe right across to Russia’s borders,” Professor Joseph Camilleri from La Trobe University says.
Professor Camilleri told Ticker NEWS he doesn’t think an incursion will occur. Instead, he believes Russia considers the U.S. as an “adversary that will never redeem itself”.
It could be a strategic gambit for Russia, or the nation could be playing with fire.
Why does the U.S. want to get involved?
It feels like Cold-War era power play is at the heart of this. So why does the U.S. want to get involved in another conflict on another continent?
The U.S. is a founding member of NATO, which contributes thousands of active personnel across Europe.
European NATO members are currently spending 2 per cent of GDP on defence by 2024. The U.S. has previously pushed for more under President Trump.
But unlike Mr Putin, the U.S. is a big supporter of democracy—something that was came to life at Mr Biden’s Summit for Democracy.
The U.S. wants to fight for democracy. President Biden describes it as “the defining challenge of our time”.
As such, the U.S. sees the Russia-Ukraine conflict as critical to meeting those objectives. Importantly, the U.S. has zero NATO obligations to Ukraine so it’s hard to imagine a large military presence on the ground fighting Russia.
With economic sanctions for Russia, and a red-faced U.S. all on the table. It appears like this conflict may end in checkmate sooner than expected.
Costa is a news producer at ticker NEWS. He has previously worked as a regional journalist at the Southern Highlands Express newspaper. He also has several years' experience in the fire and emergency services sector, where he has worked with researchers, policymakers and local communities. He has also worked at the Seven Network during their Olympic Games coverage and in the ABC Melbourne newsroom.
He also holds a Bachelor of Arts (Professional), with expertise in journalism, politics and international relations. His other interests include colonial legacies in the Pacific, counter-terrorism, aviation and travel.
In Short:
– Aden International Airport closed amid rising Saudi-UAE tensions, stranding passengers and highlighting the Yemen crisis.
– Saudi airstrikes targeted STC positions, escalating the conflict as Saudi Arabia and UAE’s interests increasingly clash.
Yemen’s Aden International Airport closed on Thursday due to rising tensions between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), stranding many passengers. This shutdown highlights an escalating crisis between the two Gulf nations over control of Yemen’s resource-rich eastern provinces. Military operations backed by Saudi Arabia resulted in multiple fatalities.Air traffic was suspended following new flight restrictions imposed by Yemen’s internationally recognised government, which is supported by Riyadh. Instead of compliance, Yemen’s transport minister, aligned with the UAE-backed Southern Transitional Council (STC), announced a total shutdown, leaving travellers in difficult situations, especially those needing urgent medical care.
The aviation discord exemplifies a larger divide fracturing the Saudi-led coalition involved in the Yemen conflict. Recent Saudi airstrikes targeted an STC military camp in Al-Khasah, resulting in numerous casualties. Saudi-backed forces initiated a military campaign aimed at reclaiming control over territory occupied by the STC.
Gulf Powers
The situation escalated when the STC seized extensive regions in Hadramout and Al-Mahra provinces. Saudi Arabia publicly condemned the UAE’s activities as a threat to its national security and demanded troop withdrawal. In response, the UAE refuted the claims and prepared to withdraw its forces, although the STC has remained entrenched in its positions.
The current conflict marks a significant public feud between Saudi Arabia and the UAE. They have collaborated since 2015 to combat the Iran-backed Houthi rebels, but their diverging interests have increasingly placed them in opposition.
UAE stock markets experienced mixed results on Friday, reflecting the ongoing regional tensions. Dubai’s index rose 1.1 percent, primarily driven by gains in Emaar Development and Emirates NBD Bank. Conversely, Abu Dhabi’s index remained stable, impacted by a downturn in Abu Dhabi National Energy Company.
In Short:
– Russia claims Ukraine targeted Putin’s residence with drones, but the CIA dismisses this as disinformation.
– Ukraine denies allegations, arguing they are fabrications hindering peace talks and lacking evidence.
Russia has provided the United States with purported evidence suggesting Ukraine’s involvement in a drone attack aimed at President Vladimir Putin’s residence. This assertion comes as the CIA and other Western officials have dismissed the claims as disinformation.Admiral Igor Kostyukov, head of Russia’s military intelligence, presented a navigation controller from a downed drone to a U.S. military attache. Russian officials claim that the device’s data indicates the drones targeted Putin’s residence in an attack on December 29, involving 91 drones.
The CIA briefed President Donald Trump that Ukraine did not target Putin or his residence during the incident, asserting that the drones were aimed at a military facility instead. This assessment was communicated to Trump on December 31.
Ukraine has refuted the allegations, with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy condemning them as fabrications meant to justify further attacks and hinder peace discussions. The country’s Center for Countering Disinformation pointed out the lack of evidence, such as air defense activity or drone crash footage.
Diplomatic Ramifications
The situation arose shortly after Trump met with Zelenskyy to discuss potential peace agreements. Trump’s initial anger towards Putin’s claims shifted to skepticism as he later shared opinions that criticized Russia’s role in the peace process.
EU Foreign Policy Chief Kaja Kallas labelled Russia’s assertions as distractions aimed at hindering diplomatic negotiations. Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov implied that the incident might lead Moscow to reconsider its stance in ongoing discussions aimed at resolving the conflict.
China slaps 55% tariff on Australian beef as trade and geopolitical tensions rise
China has imposed a 55% tariff on Australian beef imports that exceed quota limits, a move that threatens more than $1 billion in annual trade and has reignited tensions between Canberra and Beijing. The restrictions, effective from January 1 for three years, cap Australia’s beef quota at 205,000 tonnes—below the volume China imported in 2024—prompting industry claims the decision undermines the spirit of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement.
Calm fears
Beef producers warn the impact could be severe, with exports to China potentially falling by as much as one-third compared to 2025 levels. Industry groups say the move advantages rival exporters, with Brazil and Argentina receiving far larger quotas, raising concerns Australia could permanently lose market share in a key global market. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has sought to calm fears, saying Australia is not being singled out and describing the beef sector as the strongest it has ever been.
The tariff decision comes against the backdrop of growing geopolitical strain, days after Australia criticised China’s “Justice Mission 2025” military drills near Taiwan as destabilising. Opposition figures are urging the government to leverage diplomatic ties with President Xi Jinping to ensure Australia is not swept up in broader trade retaliation, as industry calls mount for urgent talks to stabilise relations.