IBAC report reveals serious misconduct but stops short of corruption, leaving political consequences to Victorian voters, says Professor Berg
Professor Chris Berg explains why the IBAC report stopped short of finding corruption while still documenting what he describes as serious misconduct and failures of good government.
He argues the behaviour came close to illegality without crossing the legal threshold.
The discussion explores the difference between corruption, misconduct and unethical conduct, and why the political consequences may now rest with Victorian voters rather than the courts.
