Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

News

Savage Chinese diner assault – calls for punishment

Published

on

Footage portraying a group of men attacking women patrons at a Tangshan restaurant in China went viral earlier this week

The horror attack sparked global outrage, with many calling for punishment of the perpetrators.

Video shows one of the men approcahing a woman at the restaurant at around 2:40 am, he then strikes her with force when she pushes him away.

The confrontation got worse when additional men began attacking the woman as well as other women at the restaurant.

Will this be dealt with properly considering there is physical proof?

Yaqiu Wang from Human Rights Watch spoke exclusively to tickerNEWS.

She says that the government announced that several perpetrators have been arrested and will be held accountable for the attack as a result of the footage serving as proof.

“I think it was because first of all, it was captured by surveillance camera, secondly, there was this uproar on the Chinese internet and people demanding those people to be brought to justice,” Wang says.

She says that the woman who was attacked was lucky that there was CCTV which captured the assault.

“I’m sure this happened to a lot of other women in China, but those assaults were never captured by surveillance camera and never went viral online, and the police never took action.”

What is the broader issue here?

Wang says that this is a case of gander-based violence.

“It’s definitely not limited to China, it’s an issue across the globe,” she says.

Saying that it is evident that the Chinese goverment has plenty of power to address issues that it wants to, but it doesn’t seem interested in tackling this kind of problems.

“This state has so much power … [and] capability to address gender-based violence, just the government is not doing it.”

YAQIU WANG, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH

China only made domestic violence punishable by law in March 2016 and before 2001, physical abuse was not even grounds for divorce.

Wang says that the enforcement of such laws in China is inadequate.

“People still online complaining about it, they call the police and the police come and nothing results from that, or they went through the court system, then let’s say, the judge imprisoned … the man for days fewer than the woman spent in the hospital,” she says.

“So I mean, there is law, but the law is not well enforced.”

China’s growing influence over the future generation

As Hong Kong becomes less of an independent territory and transitions into a region of China, school students are being taught the state was never a British colony.

New reports say school textbooks now adopt the Beijing narrative and declare the British government “only ever exercised colonial rule” in Hong Kong.

The books claims that China’s sovereignty over Hong Kong was never disrupted.

This change to the textbooks is an exmaple of Beijing’s tightening ideological controls.

“This is just fits into the broader trend that … Beijing is taking more and more control over Hong Kong,” Wang says.

“It’s creating a new narrative about Hong Kong’s history.”

YAQIU WANG, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH

Wang says that the Chinese government employs such schemes to sway the population.

“Erasing the real history, creating a new narrative about what happened in the past has always been one of the foundational tactics by the Chinese government to control the country.”

Should there be more protection for the younger generation moving forward?

“Yes, but you know, how do you do it?” says Wang.

She says the Chinese governement has always censored information that may shed a different light on the narrative dictated by the government to the public.

The government conceals the true history and events in fear of losing power over the people of China.

Resorting to distribution of misleading education, especially to the younger generation, and propaganda in attempts to maintain authoritarian control in the country.

Danaya Malenda contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Trump’s trade war may impact Australian medicine prices

Trump’s trade war could raise Australian medicine costs and limit availability, complicating PBS negotiations and tariff impacts.

Published

on

Trump’s trade war could raise Australian medicine costs and limit availability, complicating PBS negotiations and tariff impacts.

In Short

Concerns arise in Australia over a US-Australia trade dispute affecting medicine costs and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Potential US tariffs could raise drug prices and impact access, despite the US arguing for higher prices to reflect drug development costs.

Talks of a trade dispute between the US and Australia regarding medicine costs have raised concerns among Australians.

The potential impact on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and tariffs on Australian drugs entering the US raises questions about drug prices and availability.

The PBS offers subsidised medicines, maintaining low out-of-pocket costs for consumers. Drug companies must submit evidence to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), which assesses the cost-effectiveness of drugs.

Donald Trump’s imposition of tariffs could prompt a rise in medicine prices or lead to shortages. Price negotiations occur between the government and drug companies, with consumers paying a fixed co-payment regardless of the drug’s cost to the government.

The US argues the PBS undervalues innovative drugs, seeking higher prices that reflect development costs. However, the PBAC aims to keep prices low, benefiting consumers.

Tariffs on Australian pharmaceuticals exported to the US could hike prices and reduce demand for Australian-made drugs, although most medicines in Australia are sourced overseas.

Even if Australia retaliated with tariffs on US pharmaceuticals, it would likely harm access to innovative drugs and lead to increased negotiation restrictions.

While the trade negotiations’ outcome remains uncertain, it is unlikely the US can significantly influence Australian pharmaceutical pricing, especially with anticipated reductions in consumer drug costs.

Continue Reading

News

Trump orders Department of Education to close permanently

Trump signs executive order to dismantle Department of Education, triggering concerns over impact on American education system.

Published

on

Trump signs executive order to dismantle Department of Education, triggering concerns over impact on American education system.

In Short

President Trump has signed an executive order to start closing the Department of Education, stating education should be managed at the state level.

The decision has raised concerns among education advocates about the potential negative impact on federal education programs and student access.

President Trump signed an executive order on Thursday to begin the process of closing the Department of Education.

This move aligns with his ongoing campaign promise, although specific details were not provided at the signing ceremony.

The order follows a recent announcement from the department about plans to reduce its workforce significantly, raising concerns about the future of numerous federal education programs.

During the signing ceremony, Trump stated that education should be managed at the state level. He assured that critical funding for low-income schools, special needs students, and Pell Grants would be maintained and redistributed to other agencies.

Trump explained the urgency of dismantling the department, asserting that it is not beneficial to the American education system.

In response to this decision, education advocates expressed strong concerns, warning that abolishing the department could disrupt the education system and negatively affect students.

They argue that without federal oversight, college access could decline, student loan defaults could rise, and unscrupulous institutions could exploit students.

Continue Reading

News

Inside Trump and Putin hold 90-minute call on Ukraine

Published

on

Leaders agree to Middle East negotiations and energy infrastructure ceasefire.

A pivotal 90-minute conversation between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin could mark a crucial step toward ending the war in Ukraine.

The White House confirmed that the two leaders agreed to begin immediate negotiations in the Middle East and implement a ceasefire on energy infrastructure.

Trump described the discussion as “very good and productive,” noting that both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are eager to see the conflict come to an end.

“Many elements of a Contract for Peace were discussed,” Trump said on Truth Social, adding that the process to end the war is now “in full force and effect.”

As part of the talks, Putin reportedly agreed to a mutual 30-day pause on strikes targeting energy facilities and ordered Russian forces to comply.

In a further sign of potential de-escalation, Moscow has pledged to return 23 seriously wounded Ukrainian soldiers to Kyiv as a goodwill gesture.

While Trump remains optimistic about progress, he acknowledged that “many elements of a Final Agreement” still need to be resolved.

As diplomatic efforts intensify, global attention is now focused on whether negotiations in the Middle East can pave the way for a lasting ceasefire and eventual peace deal.

Ira Chaleff, a political commentator, bi-partisan leader in Congress, and author, “How To Stop a Tyrant: The Power of Political Followers to Make or BRAKE a Toxic Leader” joins Veronica Dudo to discuss.

Continue Reading

Trending Now