There have been twin bomb attacks and mass shootings at Kabul’s major international airport as thousands flee following the Taliban takeover
Following the attacks near the Kabul airport Thursday local time, Pentagon officials claimed that ISIS, and the terror network claimed responsibility.
Who are they?
The Islamic State Khorasan Province, or ISIS-K, is an enemy of Taliban.
ISIS-K is a terrorist organisation that is responsible for numerous deadly attacks in Afghanistan.
What’s their aim?
The group is an affiliate of the Islamic State group that ripped through Iraq and Syria from 2014.
ISIS-K’s objective is to set up the province of Khorasan to be a part of Islamic State’s so-called global caliphate.
Why do Taliban see them as a threat?
“ISIS-K is a sworn enemy of the Taliban, and they have a history of fighting one another,” US President Joe Biden said on Sunday.
Doctor John Coyne, who’s the head of strategic policing and law enforcement at ASPI says the attacks seen at Kabul airport “was a cowardly attack by #ISIS, attacking unarmed civilians who are already desperate and scared”
“It was obviously reasonably well planned and synchronised, which shows the capability of ISIS came this.”
So what does ISIS-k have to gain with terrorist attacks? and what has the Taliban’s reaction been?
Doctor John Coyne from ASPI ON WHO ISIS-K IS
Coyne’s understanding is that ISIS-K have actually gone through and claimed this attack, which is not really surprising.
“So interesting enough as the Taliban approached, there’s some interesting allegations coming out that as they freed prisoners from couple jail, freeing their own fighters, they also executed a number of ISK members,” he told ticker news.
Coyne says Taliban is trying to legitimately form a government.
“And I think, whilst they may despise the US government, they very much and want to take control and have this end as quickly as possible, they very much understand that it’s not in their long term interest to have terrorist attacks.”
He says that further tragedy only encourages future interference in the Taliban’s country.
“So from that perspective, I think the Taliban are cooperating as quickly as possible. They’ve set a hard date to get this over and done with and they don’t want to terror attacks, they just want the Americans out as quickly as possible. Of course, we’re, you know, our fingers crossed that this can come down in some degree, but we have no idea. If that’s taking place.”
Can we expect more attacks?
We know the US and the White House have already made comment that they’re on red alert for more attacks.
Coyne notes that what tech showed the world, is that ISIS have a capability to recon and plan attacks, and reasonably sophisticated attacks.
“They’ve got an intent to appear on the world stage. And at the moment, the biggest target on the world stage is Kabul airport, all eyes of the globe are sitting there watching that tragedy unfold.”
“So of course, it’s a pressure cooker environment, and there’s a high risk of further attacks.”
Coyne says Taliban are going to have to fight other warlords who continue to maintain pair remote areas across Afghanistan, and they’re also going to have to fight the likes of ISIS-K.
“And they’re going to have to reconcile what they will do with the future about Al Qaeda.”
In Short:
– Trump ordered the Pentagon to resume nuclear testing, risking global tensions and retaliation from other nations.
– Proliferation concerns are rising as nuclear states modernise arsenals and the New START Treaty nears expiration.
US President Donald Trump has ordered the Pentagon to resume nuclear weapons testing immediately, aiming to align with testing programs from other countries according to the conversation.Resuming explosive nuclear tests would likely trigger retaliatory responses from nuclear-armed nations like Russia and China, worsening the arms race and increasing global risks.
The potential for worldwide radioactive fallout remains high, even for underground tests. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, signed by 187 states, prohibits such testing, yet the US remains a signatory without ratification, bound not to violate the treaty’s intent.
Nuclear weapon testing, once crucial for understanding weapon effects and military planning, has diminished. Since World War II, nuclear tests have largely focused on developing new designs. Significant environmental and health concerns led to a moratorium on atmospheric testing in the early 1960s and the Partial Test Ban Treaty in 1963.
Many countries, including the US, stopped explosive testing in the 1990s. Technological advancements allowed nations to develop nuclear weapons without the need for actual explosions.
Proliferation Risks
Nuclear proliferation continues, with all nine nuclear-armed states investing heavily in modernising their arsenals. This raises concerns about lowered thresholds for using such weapons.
Recent conflicts involving nuclear threats have escalated, and the number of nuclear weapons operationally available has begun to rise again. Russia has tested advanced nuclear weapons, while China is rapidly expanding its military capabilities.
The New START Treaty, which confines the nuclear capabilities of the US and Russia, is set to expire soon, with no successor treaty negotiations underway.
The Doomsday Clock has moved closer to midnight this year, highlighting the heightened dangers facing the world today.
Central banks ease rate cut hopes amid inflation and wobbling tech stocks; markets adjust to Fed’s new stance.
Central banks pull back on rate cut expectations as tech stocks wobble and inflation pressures persist. Markets adjust cautiously to the Fed’s new tone.