China’s influence in the Pacific is causing concern for some Western nations who are playing a diminished role in the region
Tides are changing in the Pacific, an area which has long deferred to the West, but is increasingly gazing eastward.
The changing dynamic has been typified by the landmark security deal signed by China and the Solomon Islands. This week, Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi embarked on an historic 10 day tour of eight Pacific Island nations.
Should Western nations fear China’s growing influence in the Pacific?
The Pacific Islands have a long history of Western influence, dating back hundreds of years to European colonisation.
But nations such as Australia and the U.S. are suddenly having to contend with the arrival of a new player.
Benjamin Herscovitch, a research fellow at the Australia National University, told TICKER NEWS China’s increased influence in the area represents a “dramatic shift in circumstances” for the region.
“We are at the beginning of a really heated up period of competition between Australia and China for influence in the Pacific,” he says.
This will place further pressure on an already strained relationship.
In recent years, the two nations have butted heads over a number of issues including human rights and territorial disputes in the South China Sea.
Two weeks ago, relations between the two nations flared again. In the lead up to the Australian federal election, then defence minister Peter Dutton labelled the presence of a Chinese spy ship off the coast of Western Australia was “an aggressive act”.
Despite outcry from the West, there is still no evidence China’s intentions in the Pacific have militaristic undercurrents.
Yi has started his tour of the Pacific by promising his government has “no intention” of building a military base in the Solomon Islands.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is on a ten day tour of the Pacific
What is China’s goal in the Pacific?
While China’s role in the Pacific will likely become a point of contention, Herscovitch doesn’t believe it is coming from a position of Chinese aggression.
Rather, it is the natural progression for a country becoming more influential across the globe.
“A lot of the alarmist commentary in Australia maybe fails to appreciate that we’re coming in this period of rising Chinese influence and power globally,” he says.
“It’s almost to be expected that you’d have Beijing having a much larger footprint in Australia’s region.”
“China is a country with an incredibly large economy, with trading interests that span the globe, with diplomatic and political interests that span the globe.”
Benjamin Herscovitch, ANU
“China’s expanding footprint, expanding influence is just part and parcel of China emerging as the globe’s greatest economic power,” he says.
Will Island nations benefit from competition in the Pacific?
Herscovitch says the dispute could be “a good news story” for island nations because states will compete to invest in the area as a way to build influence in the Pacific.
“We’ll see a lot of competition for investment, a lot of competition for influence between key economies, and that’s probably beneficial for Pacific Island countries,” he says.
Pacific nations also look set to benefit by increased action on climate change.
As some of the most low-lying nations in the world, global warming and rising sea levels are of huge concern to the area.
Australia’s foreign minister Penny Wong also visited the Pacific to pledge an improvement in Australia’s climate change policy.
“There’s a sense here in which Australia’s desire for influence will encourage Australia to be more forward leaning, more proactive on climate change issues,” Herscovitch says.
New role for the West in the pacific?
With China beginning to gain a foothold in the Pacific, Herscovitch says the West may have to alter its diplomatic approach.
He believes Australia and U.S. have been overly critical of South Pacific countries, and in particular the Solomon Islands, for engaging with China.
In the backlash following Solomon Islands’ defence treaty with China, the nation’s Prime Minister Mannasseh Sogavare accused the Australian government and its allies of undermining his government.
Herscovitch labels this approach as “counterproductive” to maintaining relations with the Pacific nations, saying “we should always respect their sovereign decisions and respect their independent choices.”
He says Australia, the U.S. and Japan has a highly important role in providing expertise and advise on how to manage their relationship with China as they become more economically entwined with the global power.
“They’re relying on China for more infrastructure, and it’s really important that their officials are empowered with all the necessary information to manage that relationship and to manage that growing dependency,” he says.
In Short:
– Trump announced layoffs for thousands of government workers, blaming Democrats during the government shutdown.
– Job cuts affect multiple agencies, with unions filing lawsuits against the layoffs’ legality.
President Donald Trump announced layoffs affecting thousands of U.S. government workers, attributing the decision to Democrats during the ongoing government shutdown.Job cuts began at several federal agencies, including the Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Department of Health and Human Services, although the overall number of layoffs remains uncertain.
Roughly 300,000 federal workers were already anticipated to leave jobs this year due to a downsizing initiative by Trump.
The layoffs come as Trump continues to pressure Democrats for government funding. Republicans, holding majorities in Congress, require Democratic support in the Senate for funding measures.
Democrats insist they will not compromise under pressure, holding Republicans accountable for job losses. Labor unions have filed lawsuits against the layoffs, arguing their legality during the shutdown.
Job Cuts
A federal court will hear the case soon. Despite legal requirements for notification before layoffs, some officials have raised concerns over the impact on federal services.
Top Republican Senator Susan Collins expressed her objection to the layoffs, emphasising the importance of federal employees.
A White House budget director confirmed the initiation of layoffs, while many federal workers are either on furlough or working without pay. The Department of Health and Human Services is particularly affected, with a substantial number of staff receiving layoff notices.
Job reductions are also reported at the Education and Commerce Departments, among others. The Department of Homeland Security has made cuts in its cybersecurity division. However, the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration remain unaffected.
In Short:
– Hamas called Trump a racist but believes he may help facilitate peace with Israel.
– Ongoing negotiations are uncertain, with Hamas optimistic despite lacking formal guarantees.
Hamas has called Donald Trump a racist and a “recipe for chaos.” However, a phone call from Trump convinced Hamas that he might facilitate a peace deal with Israel, even if they surrender their hostages.
Under the agreement, which began on Friday, Hamas will release hostages without a commitment from Israel to withdraw. This decision is seen as precarious, with fears that hostilities may resume post-release, similar to events following a previous ceasefire.
During indirect negotiations, Trump’s involvement reportedly reassured Hamas leaders, bolstering their confidence in a lasting ceasefire.
Future Uncertain
Negotiations continue over details such as the timetable for Israeli troop withdrawal.
The mediating role of Qatar and Turkey has been pivotal, alongside U.S. participation, in moving discussions forward.
Hamas has shifted its stance on hostage retention, viewing it as detrimental to global support for their cause. Nonetheless, they received no formal guarantees regarding the progression towards a more comprehensive agreement to end the conflict.
Despite awareness of the risks involved in their gamble, Hamas leaders seem optimistic about ongoing talks, with pressures from mediators fostering a sense of seriousness in negotiations from both sides.
Trump’s anticipated visit to the region is expected to reinforce these developments, even as complexities remain in finalising the terms of the deal.
In Short:
– Trump plans a 100% tariff on China from November 1, sparking stock declines and heightening tensions.
– U.S.-China relations are strained, with potential severe impacts on U.S. industries due to export restrictions.
President Trump announced plans to impose a 100% additional tariff on China effective November 1, along with new export controls on crucial software products.
The decision follows China’s recent restrictions on rare-earth minerals, essential for industries like semiconductors and electric vehicles. Trump expressed disbelief over China’s actions, which have escalated tensions that had ostensibly improved after months of trade negotiations.
The tariff announcement sparked a significant drop in U.S. stocks, marking the worst day for the S&P 500 since April.
While some administration officials advocate restarting trade talks from scratch, there is a looming opportunity for both countries to negotiate before the tariffs take effect. Trump left room for negotiations, suggesting the timeline could allow for de-escalation.
Export Controls
The conflict between the U.S. and China underscores the volatile relationship between the two major economies. Beijing’s decision to tighten export controls aims to leverage its position and weaken Trump’s negotiating stance.
The U.S. government is evaluating additional countermeasures and sanctions in response. Observers note that while both countries have expressed a desire for dialogue, securing an enduring agreement has proven challenging, with past resolutions quickly unraveling.
The potential implications of these export restrictions could be severe for various U.S. industries. Firms have warned about significant production halts if they cannot access critical rare-earth elements from China. Analysts suggest that the situation could compel both sides to reconsider their positions to prevent further economic fallout.