Walt Disney (DIS.N) reported missing Wall Street’s revenue expectations for the quarter, yet assured investors that it was set to surpass its earlier commitment to slash costs by over $5.5 billion as pledged in February.
Despite the announcement, the entertainment conglomerate noted a slight underperformance in U.S. Disney+ subscribers compared to analyst forecasts.
Following the release of the results, Disney shares experienced a 1% decline in after-hours trading.
CEO Bob Iger, in his second tenure leading Disney, confronts a range of challenges spanning the entirety of the entertainment empire. Apart from Wall Street’s mandate to attain profitability in its streaming division, Disney contends with a deteriorating television segment and a film box office that has yet to rebound to pre-COVID levels.
Iger addressed this transformation in a statement, characterizing it as “unprecedented” and inclusive of company restructuring aimed at enhancing efficiency and rekindling creativity. “In the eight months since my return, these important changes are creating a more cost-effective, coordinated and streamlined approach to our operations, that has put us on track to exceed our initial goal of $5.5 billion in savings,” he stated.
Disney’s fiscal third quarter saw a reduction in losses within its streaming video services to $512 million, compared to a loss of approximately $1.1 billion from a year ago. The addition of 800,000 Disney+ subscribers fell short by 100,000 in comparison to analyst projections. Furthermore, the company saw a decrease of 12.5 million subscribers for the Disney Hotstar service in India, representing nearly 25% of its subscribers. This was attributed to the relinquishment of rights to Indian Premiere League cricket matches.
Revenue for the quarter ending July 1 was reported at $22.33 billion, indicating a 4% increase from the previous year. However, this figure fell below the Wall Street consensus estimate of $22.5 billion, as per Refinitiv data. Adjusted earnings per share amounted to $1.03, surpassing Wall Street’s forecast of 95 cents per share. The comparability of these adjusted profit figures was not immediately clear.
The quarter included $2.65 billion in impairment and restructuring charges, covering expenses related to content removal from streaming services, termination of licensing agreements, and $210 million in severance payments for laid-off employees.
Disney’s conventional television business sustained a decline in revenue and operating income across both its broadcast and cable TV sectors. Elevated production costs for sports programming and decreased affiliate revenue impacted the performance of its cable channels. Television revenue for the quarter experienced a 7% decrease, amounting to $6.7 billion, while operating income dropped by 23%, reaching $1.9 billion.
Disney’s direct-to-consumer segment recorded a 9% rise in revenue, totaling $5.5 billion, with higher average revenue per subscriber for Disney+ and Hulu.
The unit responsible for content sales and licensing reported a more substantial operating loss of $243 million, compared to a $27 million loss in the preceding year. This quarter encompassed the release of “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3,” which underperformed at the box office compared to the prior year’s “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness.” The live-action remake of “The Little Mermaid,” released during the same quarter, also fell short of expectations.
The Parks, Experiences, and Products group observed a 13% revenue increase, reaching $8.3 billion, alongside an 11% boost in operating income, totaling $2.4 billion. The upturn was driven by the recovery of Shanghai Disney Resort, which operated throughout the quarter compared to the same period a year ago when it was closed for all but three days due to COVID-19 restrictions. The domestic parks experienced a decline in operating income, largely attributed to decreased performance at the Walt Disney World Resort in Orlando, Florida.
RBA maintains 4.35% rates as mortgage applications surge
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has decided to keep its official cash rate at 4.35%, citing concerns over the rapidly increasing number of mortgage applications.
This decision comes after several consecutive meetings where the RBA has refrained from adjusting interest rates.
The central bank’s decision to hold rates steady reflects their cautious approach to managing the current housing market boom. Mortgage applications have seen a significant surge in recent months, driven by record-low interest rates and increased demand for housing. While this has been a boon for the real estate industry, it has raised concerns about the potential for a housing bubble and financial stability.
Experts are divided on whether the RBA’s decision is the right course of action.
Some argue that maintaining low-interest rates is necessary to support economic recovery, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Others worry that the continued surge in mortgage applications without rate adjustments could lead to unsustainable levels of household debt.
In light of this decision, homeowners, prospective buyers, and investors will be closely watching the housing market’s trajectory and wondering how long the RBA can maintain its current stance.
There’s a 50/50 chance of a 2024 recession
The economy has been remarkably resilient despite massive pressures – but is that about to change in 2024?
The US economy is in for a sharp slowdown in 2024 as a closely watched survey of top economists foresees stubbornly high inflation, a rise in unemployment and a 50% chance of recession.
#ticker today #money
Tesla insurance sued for ‘inflated’ premiums, judge rules
A judge has ruled that Tesla’s insurance unit must face a lawsuit alleging “inflated” premiums.
The decision comes after policyholders claimed the electric car company’s insurance division overcharged them for coverage.
The lawsuit, which was filed by a group of Tesla policyholders, alleges that the premiums charged by Tesla’s insurance unit were significantly higher than market rates for similar coverage.
The plaintiffs argue that Tesla’s insurance division engaged in unfair pricing practices, leading to overpayment by policyholders.
Tesla has not yet commented on the judge’s decision, but the lawsuit raises questions about the transparency and fairness of the company’s insurance pricing.
It also highlights the growing scrutiny on how tech companies enter and compete in traditional industries like insurance.
YouTuber Trevor Jacob behind bars for plane crash stunt
Russian women want their men back from Ukraine
How will we entertain ourselves
Crypto.com accidentally transfers $10.5m to woman instead of $100
What is happening between SHIB and Vitalik? | TICKER VIEWS
Russia has cancelled itself. But the world should beware of poking the Russian bear￼
Tech24 hours ago
Amazon taps SpaceX for satellite launch, bypasses Bezos
Leaders5 days ago
Transforming Diversity with Impactful Passion
News2 days ago
Will TV regulation become irrelevant in the future?
News24 hours ago
UK introduces tougher visa rules to curb immigration
News6 days ago
‘Endlessly Generous’: Tributes Pour In as Henry Kissinger Passes Away at 100
Tech2 days ago
Sam Altman and Elon Musk’s feud revealed
News2 days ago
The reason petrol is suddenly cheaper
News3 days ago
COP28: Global effort to phase out fossil fuels