Twenty years ago, the world changed. The September 11 attacks, and the subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq shifted the global terrorism discourse forever
September 11 sparked a new age in terrorism. It placed transnational attacks as a central threat to international norms and security.
The collapse of the Twin Towers; the Pentagon explosion; and the airliner crash in Pennsylvania became vivid reminders that a person’s ordinary day could come to an abrupt and devastating end at the hands of violent extremists.
Nearly 3,000 people lost their lives on September 11, 2001. Twenty years on, their stories are not too distant. The images are not in black and white. They are in colour, on our television screens and even referenced popular culture.
“We do not fight Islam, we fight against evil.”
PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH
As the world pauses to mark this sombre anniversary, it calls for a reflection on how September 11 changed stereotypes forever.
Representations are important
A few year years ago, I interviewed Shehzi Yusaf, a clinical psychologist who forms part of the Psychology from an Islamic Perspective Interest Group.
The group looks at the mental health concerns of Muslims, and ensures a platform for the definition and nature of Islamic psychology.
But Yusaf said the September 11 attacks had created a lifetime of mental health symptoms for her Muslim clients.
“They have just lived in that era of hostility towards their religion,” she said.
A 2017 study found “significantly more terrorism” has occurred on both a domestic and international front since the September 11 attacks.
Smith and Zeigler’s research concluded that “Jihadist terrorism looks to have become more enduring and wide-spread in the past 15 years.”
Sadly, this appears to have changed perspectives of the Muslim faith.
A 2015 report from the Scanlon Foundation found some groups of Australian Muslims reported high levels of discrimination, including 51 per cent of those who were born in Australia.
The organisation provides grants to improve social cohesion across Australia.
Yusaf said between 15 and 22 per cent of Australians support discrimination based on religion.
Similarly, I recall interviewing Ambreen Mirza who works with Islamic women.
When Mirza gave me the address to her business, she told me to keep it strictly private because of her ongoing fear associated with being Muslim.
“When we work with young people, a lot of their challenges of people a Muslim is not being labelled a terrorist.”
AMBREEN MIRZA
I was stunned, I didn’t think this happened in contemporary society, and it was largely because of the 9/11 attacks.
Who is responsible?
Mirza believes the media, and far-right politicians are to blame for the xenophobic rhetoric on Muslims.
It’s hard to disagree with her. We’ve all seen the September 11-inspired films like United 93, Zero Dark Thirty, or The Reluctant Fundamentalist.
Terrorists depicted in the film United 93.
In these films, men with dark features and excessive facial hair are stereotyped as terrorists.
London-based actor Omar Berdouni, who played one of the terrorists in United 93, didn’t expect films like this to be made.
“Not only the passengers were hijacked that day. Also my religion was hijacked in a way that they were killing innocent people in the name of Islam, which couldn’t be far from the truth,” he said.
Emergency services played a key part in the post-9/11 recovery. Photo: U.S. Secret Service.
But xenophobic or Islamaphobic politics isn’t going anywhere. From the Trump Administration’s hardline stance on Muslim immigration, to Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban labelling Muslim migrants as “invaders”.
Ambreen discussed the road out of September 11, and how it shifted depictions of Muslims in contemporary society.
“Often Muslims may not look Muslim, but people aren’t sold on that idea.
“If people don’t get the hijab or they don’t get the traditional ethnic Muslims then they’re not convinced. It’s like they want the ‘real thing’.”
AMBREEN MIRZA
“They think that they are some form of ‘moderate Muslim’, and you’re thinking ‘I’ve never called myself that’,” she said.
What does research tell us?
Even if we put the anecdotal evidence aside, there’s a suite of research into September 11 representations of Muslims.
In fact, research suggests the ‘war on terror’ discourse “ties together terrorism, national security, war and Muslims”.
It also plays into the narrative about Muslims being “‘inherently’ violent, threatening and as potential terrorists”.
“Here in the United States our Muslim citizens are making many contributions in business, science and law, medicine and education, and in other fields.”
PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH
As the U.S. marks the 20th anniversary of that fatal day, it’s worth reflecting on our own attitudes and choices.
Costa is a news producer at ticker NEWS. He has previously worked as a regional journalist at the Southern Highlands Express newspaper. He also has several years' experience in the fire and emergency services sector, where he has worked with researchers, policymakers and local communities. He has also worked at the Seven Network during their Olympic Games coverage and in the ABC Melbourne newsroom.
He also holds a Bachelor of Arts (Professional), with expertise in journalism, politics and international relations. His other interests include colonial legacies in the Pacific, counter-terrorism, aviation and travel.
In Short:
– Sheriff Nanos confirmed no glove was found at Nancy’s residence and maintains evidence analysis through a trusted lab.
– He believes Nancy’s case involves kidnapping, but all new evidence and possibilities are still under investigation.
In a new interview with Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos, he answers various topics concerning the ongoing investigation of Nancy’s case.Nanos stated that his office did not locate a glove at Nancy’s residence. He affirmed, “We have no glove. We never found a glove on that property.”
The sheriff explained that his office has utilised the same contracted lab for decades, long before his tenure. Evidence was initially submitted to this lab, which holds the Guthrie family DNA and other swabs. He stated it was logical to continue sending evidence there for immediate analysis alongside existing samples.
He noted the FBI’s agreement, expressing confidence in their crime lab but opting for the private lab due to initial arrangements.
Nanos asserted cooperation with the FBI, disputing claims of reluctance in seeking assistance. He contacted the FBI promptly after Nancy’s disappearance and allowed them to lead on ransom notes due to their expertise.
Investigation Details
On the possibility of kidnapping, he stated, “we believe it’s a kidnapping” while maintaining other possibilities should be considered. Different gloves were found miles away, but the importance of each remains under review.
No individuals have been definitively ruled out as suspects. Nanos described a man briefly detained nearby, stating he was satisfied with his alibi. He refrained from confirming any forced entry at Nancy’s home but did mention that blood and DNA were found at the scene.
He addressed criticism regarding the timing of releasing the crime scene, asserting that his office acted appropriately. Allegations about family involvement were dismissed, emphasising the family’s full cooperation.
Nanos confirmed communication with Savanah Guthrie but indicated she has her support system.
He dismissed past reports of a strained relationship with the FBI, asserting mutual respect and collaboration remain intact.
Kremlin blocks WhatsApp, urging citizens to use state-backed MAX; critics warn of surveillance, prompting protests in Moscow.
The Kremlin has officially blocked WhatsApp, urging Russians to switch to MAX, a state-backed messaging app. This move comes after Meta refused to comply with local regulations, sparking debates over digital freedom in the country.
Critics warn that MAX could be used for government surveillance, though authorities deny these claims. The ban highlights Russia’s growing control over foreign tech platforms and its push for locally regulated alternatives.
Activists in Moscow have staged protests calling for an open and unregulated internet, while the public reacts with a mix of concern and resignation.
US covertly sent 6,000 Starlink terminals to Iran amid protests, aiding internet access despite government shutdowns and crackdown violence.
U.S. officials report that the Trump administration covertly sent around 6,000 Starlink satellite internet terminals into Iran following widespread protests. The move was designed to bypass strict internet blackouts imposed by authorities in Tehran.
The terminals reportedly enabled activists and dissidents to reconnect with the outside world during periods of severe digital restriction, raising fresh questions about foreign involvement and cyber strategy.
As geopolitical tensions simmer, the revelation underscores how connectivity has become a powerful tool in modern conflict.