Ticker Views
China releases video to scare Pelosi from Taiwan
The new broke mid-morning Monday in Washington. The Wall Street Journal reported that House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi is going to Taiwan.
SUMMIT COUNTY COLORADO – Neither the Speaker’s office nor the White House would confirm the trip, but spokesman John Kirby, speaking from the briefing room and seeking to frame what is unfolding ahead of the visit, said:
“There is no reason for Beijing to turn a potential visit consistent with longstanding U.S. policy into some sort of crisis or use it as a pretext to increase aggressive military activity in or around the Taiwan Strait. Meanwhile our actions are not threatening and they break no new ground. Nothing about this potential visit — potential visit — which by the way has precedent, would change the status quo.”
So Pelosi in Taiwan is on, after days of speculation and significant angst over what Pelosi’s visit would mean, especially in light of China’s exceptionally hostile words about Pelosi’s trip.
As Australia knows from the bitter rhetoric and harsh punitive measures China has inflicted on Australia over trade, the messages from Beijing on this trip have risen to high-decibel levels. After the long telephone call last Thursday between President Biden and China’s President Xi Jinping, the official readout from Beijing was emphatic:
“Those who play with fire will perish by it. It is hoped that the U.S. will be clear-eyed about this.” There have been clear intimations of military displays near Taiwan to coincide with Pelosi’s visit. There are even concerns that China might target her airplane as it headed towards Taipei.
Many see Pelosi’s visit as exceptionally provocative, and it is clear China expected President Biden to do something about it, particularly after Biden said to the media 10 days ago that “the military thinks it’s not a good idea right now.”
The White House and State Department almost certainly received messages from several foreign countries, including close allies, that the trip was ill-timed and would make a tense situation even more tense at a moment when many are hoping, given all the global shocks flowing from the Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Putin’s alliance with Xi, that the objective should be to lower – not raise – the temperature on US-China strategic issues.
It was clear over the weekend, however, that the distilled consensus was that as long as the Speaker was intent on visiting Taiwan, buckling to Chinese pressure on the visit would set a most unacceptable precedent.
Why?
It is not unprecedented for a Speaker of the House to visit Taiwan. Newt Gingrich did it in 1997.
It would be unprecedented for a President to seek to block a foreign trip by a Speaker of the House. Biden can advise, but consent is not his to give. Under the United States Constitution, there are three co-equal branches of the government.
The Executive, who exercises power over foreign policy. The Congress, which appropriates money to fund the government, and passes laws affecting all official activities, including foreign policy, and fully exercises oversight authority over what the Executive does. And the Judiciary. No one branch is subordinate to the other two.
Biden can counsel but cannot tell the Speaker not to go Taipei. She has every right to go to Taipei and assess the situation to inform what Congress should – or should not – do with respect to American foreign policy interests regarding China and Taiwan and new laws that may warrant enactment.
If China could muscle the Speaker from visiting Taiwan, then China can feel it can muscle the United States from any and all other actions it may undertake with respect to Taiwan.
In Washington, that would be an unacceptable precedent.
The White House has stressed, just before the Pelosi visit gets underway, that nothing has changed with US policy: that the United States is committed, by law, to the “One China” policy and has said repeatedly that the United States “opposes any unilateral changes to the status quo.”
Translation: China must not invade Taiwan. Taiwan must not declare itself independent of China. “One China” must be fully realised peacefully.
The truly big question for today and tomorrow is: What will Pelosi’s message to Taiwan and China be when she is there? What signals will she send? What she says will directly affect strategic calculations of how to further play out the long game over Taiwan.
I met Nancy Pelosi when she was in her first term as a member of the House. It was days after the Tiananmen massacre in 1989. We were at a small dinner in Washington. All the talk was of the man before the tank – the lone soul stopping the beast in its path. But the beat slaughtered those seeking more freedom.
Pelosi talked with conviction and passion that what China did was wrong, and that Tiananmen had to inform the United States’ relationship with China.
That is where Nancy Pelosi was on the issues and who she was then. That is where she is and who Nancy Pelosi is now.
The EV transformation expands to legacy vehicles
The degree dilemma, income shifts, debt, and dream homes
Empowering women through hybrid models
-
Shows4 days agoThe power and benefit of green antitoxins
-
Shows4 days ago
Unveiling the Bitcoin halving
-
News4 days ago
Threading the needle: Meta’s new platform finally dethrones X
-
News4 days ago
Zendaya is serving in saucy sports drama “Challengers”
-
Shows4 days ago
Exploring the intersection: virtual reality and web 3
-
News4 days ago
President Biden signs TikTok bill – what’s next?
-
Shows22 hours ago
Mastering sales and leadership
-
Shows4 days ago
The crypto tax solution
