Although gender disparity in business leadership is still a huge issue, a recent study shows that the gap is beginning to close in some areas
The University of Queensland report found that the amount of women sitting on ASX200 boards has risen from 8.3% in 2008 to 33.6% in 2021.
This makes Australia one of three countries to crack the 30% threshold without any legislated quotas.
Key driving factors include the AICD’s board mentoring program, reporting on diversity and public campaigns
Dr Miriam Yates co-authored the study along with Dr Terrance Fitzsimmons and Professor Victor Callan.
She said more transparent reporting on diversity within the ASX Corporate Governance Council is a key driver behind the shift.
“We know from the research that formalised mentoring can be the catalyst for ‘opening the door’ to under-represented group members within the workplace,” she said.
The report also found that public campaigns from institutional investors, as well as the establishment of the 30% Club Australia helped drive the increase.
“In many ways, this change was cumulative, with each initiative building on the work of that which had come before,” Dr Yates said.
Source: Statistics are based on the Australian Institute of Company Directors research. Company rankings data provided by Market Index. Quarterly rebalance information provided by S&P.
However, the news wasn’t all positive
The researchers also found that a lack of affordable childcare and stereotyping have continued to act as barriers to women.
The report made a total of seven recommendations, including:
The establishment of a formal alliance of key influencers
The reinvigoration of board readiness and mentoring programs
The adoption of a 40/40/20 target for board gender parity. (40 per cent female, 40 per cent male, and 20 per cent either way)
The executive of Women on Boards Claire Braund described the news as encouraging. However, she also said growth hasn’t translated through to leadership positions.
“There is not really any significant trend for the number of female chairs or CEOs on ASX200 boards. Nor is there any uptick in the number of culturally diverse directors,” Braund said.
Currently, only one in ten blue chip company chairs is a woman.
“The worst sector for representation of women on ASX boards is the ASX200+ where the number of women effectively drops off a cliff.”
The report also highlighted this trend: “Australia’s continued improvement in board diversity sits in stark contrast to our diminishing position in terms of most other gender equality indicators, including gender diversity among top executives.”
“This phenomenon is replicated in countries where quotas on boards have led to the highest rates of female board participation; such as France, Sweden, and Germany. These markets also continue to see stubbornly low levels of female executives.”
Trend in the percentage of women ASX200 board members versus women ASX200 CEOs
The researchers traced the increase in the ASX boardroom gender diversity back to 2009
“The nation had its first female Prime Minister and Governor-General; we were in the grip of the Global Financial Crisis; and the media in many countries was highlighting the lack of diversity on company boards,” Dr Yates said.
AGEC chair Coral Ross said the report highlights important lessons as Australia works towards equity in other facets of society.
“The achievement of more than 30 per cent of women on boards is even more remarkable given Australia’s lack of progress in other gender equality measures,” she said.
A Selection of 2009 Board Gender Diversity Articles and ASX Featured in the Australian Financial Review
“It’s the mosaic of all the players that has enabled this change”
“What became apparent during the research was that there was no single institution or group of institutions that coordinated the changes and initiatives that led to the increase of women board members.”
“The systemic barriers to women’s progression in the workforce remain unaddressed and are responsible for a shrinking pipeline of women into leadership positions,” she said.
“A further identified barrier was the current board skills matrix, which favours CEO experience for board positions. When just 5 per cent of CEOs are women.”
Natasha is an Associate Producer at ticker NEWS with a Bachelor of arts from Monash University. She has previously worked at Sky News Australia and Monash University as an Online Content Producer.
In Short:
– The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by a quarter-point to address job market concerns.
– Officials expect at least two additional rate cuts by year-end amid ongoing economic uncertainties.
The Federal Reserve has reduced interest rates by a quarter-point, addressing concerns about a weakening job market overshadowing inflation worries.
A majority of officials anticipate at least two additional cuts by year-end during the remaining meetings in October and December.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell noted a significant shift in the labour market, highlighting “downside risk” in his statements.
The recent rate cut, supported by 11 of 12 Fed voters, aims to recalibrate an economy facing uncertainties from policy changes and market pressures.
Policy Dynamics
The decision comes amid intense political scrutiny, with President Trump openly criticising Powell’s reluctance to lower rates.
Despite the controversy, Powell asserts that political pressures do not influence Fed operations.
The current benchmark federal-funds rate now sits between 4% and 4.25%, the lowest since 2021, providing some reprieve to consumers and small businesses. Economic forecasts indicate ongoing complexities, including inflation trends and the impact of tariffs on labour dynamics, complicating future policy decisions.
In Short:
– This week’s Federal Reserve meeting faces unusual dissent as Chair Powell approaches his term’s end.
– Analysts predict dissent over expected rate cuts due to political pressures from Trump-appointed officials.
This week’s Federal Reserve meeting is set to be particularly unusual, with Chair Jerome Powell facing significant disagreements over future policy as he approaches the end of his term in May.Tensions began before the meeting when Fed governor Lisa Cook won a court ruling allowing her to attend, despite opposition from President Trump, who is attempting to remove her.
The situation is further complicated by the recent swearing-in of Trump adviser Stephen Miran to the Fed’s board, following a Senate confirmation.
Analysts believe Powell may encounter dissent on an expected quarter-percentage-point rate cut from both Trump-appointed officials and regional Fed presidents concerned about inflation.
Potential Dissent
Trump has urged significant rate cuts and for the board to challenge Powell’s decisions.
Some analysts predict dissenting votes from Miran and other Trump appointees in favour of larger cuts. Federal Reserve veterans express concerns that political motivations may undermine the institution’s integrity, with indications that greater dissent could become commonplace.
Reserve Bank of Australia plans to ban credit card surcharges despite banks warning of potential higher fees and weaker rewards.
In Short:
– The RBA plans to ban surcharges on debit and credit card transactions, supported by consumer group Choice.
– Major banks oppose the ban, warning it could lead to higher card fees and reduced rewards for credit card users.
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) intends to implement a ban on surcharges associated with debit and credit card transactions. Consumer advocacy group Choice endorses this initiative, arguing that it is unjust for users of low-cost debit cards to incur similar fees as credit card holders.
The major banks, however, are opposing this reform. They caution that the removal of surcharges could prompt customers to abandon credit cards due to diminished rewards.
A final decision by the RBA is anticipated by December 2025.