Although gender disparity in business leadership is still a huge issue, a recent study shows that the gap is beginning to close in some areas
The University of Queensland report found that the amount of women sitting on ASX200 boards has risen from 8.3% in 2008 to 33.6% in 2021.
This makes Australia one of three countries to crack the 30% threshold without any legislated quotas.
Key driving factors include the AICD’s board mentoring program, reporting on diversity and public campaigns
Dr Miriam Yates co-authored the study along with Dr Terrance Fitzsimmons and Professor Victor Callan.
She said more transparent reporting on diversity within the ASX Corporate Governance Council is a key driver behind the shift.
“We know from the research that formalised mentoring can be the catalyst for ‘opening the door’ to under-represented group members within the workplace,” she said.
The report also found that public campaigns from institutional investors, as well as the establishment of the 30% Club Australia helped drive the increase.
“In many ways, this change was cumulative, with each initiative building on the work of that which had come before,” Dr Yates said.
However, the news wasn’t all positive
The researchers also found that a lack of affordable childcare and stereotyping have continued to act as barriers to women.
The report made a total of seven recommendations, including:
The establishment of a formal alliance of key influencers
The reinvigoration of board readiness and mentoring programs
The adoption of a 40/40/20 target for board gender parity. (40 per cent female, 40 per cent male, and 20 per cent either way)
The executive of Women on Boards Claire Braund described the news as encouraging. However, she also said growth hasn’t translated through to leadership positions.
“There is not really any significant trend for the number of female chairs or CEOs on ASX200 boards. Nor is there any uptick in the number of culturally diverse directors,” Braund said.
Currently, only one in ten blue chip company chairs is a woman.
“The worst sector for representation of women on ASX boards is the ASX200+ where the number of women effectively drops off a cliff.”
The report also highlighted this trend: “Australia’s continued improvement in board diversity sits in stark contrast to our diminishing position in terms of most other gender equality indicators, including gender diversity among top executives.”
“This phenomenon is replicated in countries where quotas on boards have led to the highest rates of female board participation; such as France, Sweden, and Germany. These markets also continue to see stubbornly low levels of female executives.”
The researchers traced the increase in the ASX boardroom gender diversity back to 2009
“The nation had its first female Prime Minister and Governor-General; we were in the grip of the Global Financial Crisis; and the media in many countries was highlighting the lack of diversity on company boards,” Dr Yates said.
AGEC chair Coral Ross said the report highlights important lessons as Australia works towards equity in other facets of society.
“The achievement of more than 30 per cent of women on boards is even more remarkable given Australia’s lack of progress in other gender equality measures,” she said.
“It’s the mosaic of all the players that has enabled this change”
“What became apparent during the research was that there was no single institution or group of institutions that coordinated the changes and initiatives that led to the increase of women board members.”
“The systemic barriers to women’s progression in the workforce remain unaddressed and are responsible for a shrinking pipeline of women into leadership positions,” she said.
“A further identified barrier was the current board skills matrix, which favours CEO experience for board positions. When just 5 per cent of CEOs are women.”
Natasha is an Associate Producer at ticker NEWS with a Bachelor of arts from Monash University. She has previously worked at Sky News Australia and Monash University as an Online Content Producer.
The Biden administration believes it’s still “appropriate” for Israel to continue its ground and air attacks on Hezbollah.
The Middle East is a tinder box as Israel retaliates to Iran’s bombing earlier this week as well as fighting Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis in Gaza, Lebanon and Yemen. But what are the economic and geo-political implications? #featured #trending
Stocks retreated Tuesday, with rising tensions in the Middle East cooling investor momentum after a strong quarter.
Oil prices eased and stocks recovered some ground after initial reports, as hopes grew that damage from the attack and any Israeli response would remain limited.
This market drop underscores the delicate balance between geopolitical risk and economic optimism. #featured #trending
Fed Reserve Chair Jerome Powell indicated the U.S. central bank was not “in a hurry” after new data boosted confidence in ongoing economic growth and consumer spending.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell says “disinflation has been broad-based,” and recent data suggests progress towards the Fed’s 2% inflation target.
Powell says the Fed is not rushing to lower rates but will make decisions based on how the economy evolves.
When asked about rate cuts, Powell says it’s a process that will “play out over time,” signalling a steady but cautious approach. #featured #trending