Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

Money

Will you lose your job if you don’t get the Covid-19 jab? | ticker VIEWS

Published

on

Mandatory vaccines in the workforce are a contentious topic

As many major organisations move to mandate Covid-19 vaccines for their employees, questions loom over the legalities surrounding this.

Can employers lawfully require employees to get a Covid-19 vaccine?

Many companies right around the world are moving to make Covid-19 vaccines compulsory for their workers. In the United States, Disney, Delta Airlines, Google, and Walmart are among the big names already implementing the mandate.

In Australia, Qantas, Virgin Australia, and SPC are considering their own mandates. Many Unions in Australia are encouraging workers to get the vaccine but will support those who push back against it.

“As soon as vaccines become more generally available, then most employers will be able to lawfully require most employees to be vaccinated.”

Ian Neil, Barrister

 

However, the big names that have come forward with mandating Covid-19 vaccinations do indicate the sectors that will continue to do so.

Neil says that any sector where employees have to work closely with one another have to be vaccinated.

“And then, of course, other sectors, like health care and age care, who are working closely with people and the vulnerable.”

Ian Neil, Barrister

 

Does discrimination play a role?

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison says it is up to the individual companies to decide if they want to mandate Covid-19 vaccinations for employees.

Concerns are spreading around discrimination in the workforce. Does it breach discrimination laws if someone loses their employment because they refuse the jab?

“In general, it’s not unlawful to discriminate against somebody on the ground they’re not vaccinated, and it’s not unlawful to discriminate in favour of someone who is.”

“But, there will be exceptions to that rule… if they have an underlying medical or psychological condition that makes it unsafe for them to be vaccinated.”

Ian Neil, Barrister

“No one will be forced to be vaccinated, that is something that is not lawful. People will always be able to choose not to be vaccinated.”

“But, there will be consequences that attach to that choice, and one of those consequences will be that they cannot get or continue in their employment, in cases where their employers require employees to be vaccinated.”

 

Ian Neil, Barrister

 

Changing employment landscape

Since the pandemic began, it has revolutionised the employment landscape live never before.

“Universal income support, that has never happened in this country [Australia] before, and has severed the connection between work and income.” 

Ian Neil, Barrister

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Money

ANZ job cuts spark banking clash

ANZ plans to cut 3,500 jobs, sparking debate on the future of Australia’s banking sector and employment dynamics.

Published

on

ANZ plans to cut 3,500 jobs, sparking debate on the future of Australia’s banking sector and employment dynamics.


ANZ has announced plans to cut 3,500 staff and 1,000 contractors over the next year, triggering a fierce debate between business leaders, unions, and government about the future of Australia’s banking sector.

The decision raises wider questions about the resilience of the business community and the role of politics, productivity, and technology in shaping employment.

#ANZ #Banking #Jobs #Unions #Australia #Economy #TickerNews


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Money

1 in 8 households don’t have the money to buy enough food

Published

on

Katherine Kent, University of Wollongong

Around one in eight (1.3 million) Australian households experienced food insecurity in 2023. This means they didn’t always have enough money to buy the amount or quality of food they needed for an active and healthy life.

The data, released on Friday by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), show food insecurity is now a mainstream public health and equity challenge.

When funds are tight, food budgets suffer

The main driver of food insecurity in Australia is financial pressure.

Housing costs and energy bills expenses consume much of household income, leaving food as the most flexible part of the budget.

When money runs short, families cut back on groceries, buy cheaper but less nutritious food, skip meals, or rely on food charities.

These strategies come at the expense of nutrition, health and wellbeing.

Inflation has added further pressure. The cost of food has risen substantially over the past two years, with groceries for a family of four costing around $1,000 per fortnight.

Who is most affected?

Not all households are affected equally. Single parents face the highest rates of food insecurity, with one in three (34%) struggling to afford enough food.

Families with children are more vulnerable (16%) than those without (8%).

Group households, often made up of students or young workers, are also heavily affected at 28%.

Rates are even higher for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander households, where 41% report food insecurity.

Income remains a defining factor. Nearly one in four (23.2% of) households in the lowest income bracket experience food insecurity, compared with just 3.6% in the highest.

These headline numbers are only part of the story. Past research shows higher risks of food insecurity for some other groups:

While the ABS survey can not provide local breakdowns, it will also be important to know which states and territories have higher rates of food insecurity, to better inform state-level responses.

What are the impacts?

Food insecurity is both a symptom and a cause of poor health.

It leads to poorer quality diets, as households cut back on fruit, vegetables and protein-rich foods that spoil quickly. Instead, they may rely on processed items that are cheaper, more filling and keep for longer.

The ongoing stress of worrying about not having enough food takes a toll on mental health and increases social isolation.

Together these pressures increase the risk of chronic diseases including diabetes, heart disease and some cancers.

For children, not having enough food affects concentration, learning and long-term development.

Breaking this cycle means recognising that improving health depends on improving food security. Left unaddressed, food insecurity deepens existing inequalities across generations.

What can we do about it?

We already know the solutions to food insecurity and they are evidence-based.

Strengthening income support by increasing the amount of JobSeeker and other government payments is crucial. This would ensure households have enough money to cover food alongside other essentials.

Investment in universal school meals, such as free lunch programs, can guarantee children at least one nutritious meal a day.

Policies that make healthy food more affordable and available in disadvantaged areas are also important, whether through subsidies, price regulation, or support for local retailers.

Community-based approaches, such as food co-operatives where members share bulk-buying power and social supermarkets that sell donated or surplus food at low cost can help people buy cheaper food. However, they cannot be a substitute for systemic reform.

Finally, ongoing monitoring of food insecurity must be embedded in national health and social policy frameworks so we can track progress over time. The last ABS data on food insecurity was collected ten years ago, and we cannot wait another decade to understand how Australians are faring.

The National Food Security Strategy is being developed by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry with guidance from a new National Food Council. It provides an opportunity to align these actions, set measurable targets and ensure food security is addressed at a national scale.

Food insecurity is widespread and shaped by disadvantage, with serious health consequences. The question is no longer whether food insecurity exists, but whether Australia will act on the solutions.The Conversation

Katherine Kent, Senior Lecturer in Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Wollongong

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Money

Inflation data impacts markets as stocks reach highs

Inflation data and tariff uncertainty loom as U.S. stocks near record highs ahead of potential Federal Reserve rate cuts

Published

on

Inflation data and tariff uncertainty loom as U.S. stocks near record highs ahead of potential Federal Reserve rate cuts

video
play-sharp-fill
In Short:
– U.S. stock investors face crucial inflation data amidst concerns over tariffs and bond yields.
– The Federal Reserve is expected to lower interest rates following weaker job growth and trade uncertainties.
U.S. stock investors are facing a week filled with critical inflation data.
Uncertainty over tariffs and government bond yields complicates the market landscape. Despite a record high for the S&P 500 index, the recent monthly employment report revealed weaker job growth in August, prompting concerns.Banner

Investor focus turns to the upcoming U.S. consumer price index data, with implications for potential interest rate cuts.

The Federal Reserve is widely expected to reduce rates at its upcoming meeting.

Market Risks

Concerns linger around tariffs, especially after a court ruling deemed many of President Trump’s tariffs illegal.

This has muddied the decision-making for corporations and investors. Higher long-dated U.S. government debt yields, which reached 5% for the first time in over a month, have also contributed to stock market challenges.

Despite a substantial 10% rise in the S&P 500 this year, traders remain cautious as economic releases could disrupt elevated stock valuations amidst ongoing trade uncertainties.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Trending Now