President Biden made the right strategic decision on Afghanistan. Here’s why.
On August 11, President Biden was riding high. The Senate had passed not only the $1 trillion bipartisan agreement on infrastructure, but the $3.5 trillion budget blueprint for the lion’s share of the Biden domestic policy agenda: education, seniors, childcare, climate change, and much more. It all pointed to victory on Capitol Hill.
Two weeks later, by August 25, Biden had been plunged into the biggest crisis of his presidency: the complete collapse of Afghanistan and evisceration of plans for an orderly withdrawal from that country. 13 soldiers killed, many more wounded, in the worst loss of life by US forces in Afghanistan in a decade.
Also shocking was the intelligence failure that upended how Biden wanted to see the war concluded and Americans brought home safely. As the Washington Post reported Sunday:
“In June, U.S. intelligence agencies had assessed that the Afghan government would hang on for at least another six months. By August, the dominant view was that the Taliban wasn’t likely to pose a serious threat to Kabul until late fall.
The outcome stunned top U.S. officials, several of whom had been on vacation when the weekend began, having expected the pro-Western government to hang on for weeks, if not months or even years longer.”
The President met the plane carrying their bodies when it arrived in Delaware, and it was an occasion of overwhelming grief
And there may be more murderous acts before the evacuations are complete. As Biden warned on Saturday: “The threat of terrorist attacks on the airport remains high. Our commanders informed me that an attack is highly likely in the next 24-36 hours.”
Even in the most monstrous atrocities, however, there will be ugly politics – especially in Washington. Israel’s Prime Minister Naftali Bennett struck a high chord of meaning in his meeting with Bide on Friday. “The American service members lost their lives on a mission to save other people’s lives, and that’s the very definition of courage and sacrifice.”
But that comfort does not last long
From the Republicans, there are calls for the resignation of Secretary of State Tony Blinken and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan. Several Republicans are calling for Biden to be impeached.
Western allies are questioning the leadership and judgment of President Biden and his foreign policy team and are wondering how steadfast the US under Biden will really be.
And there is criticism from some Democrats. Rep Jamie Raskin was a stalwart in the impeachments of Donald Trump. “Up until the point of Afghanistan, people were very impressed by the organization and seriousness and maturity of the Biden presidency and its administration. Whether it fundamentally tarnishes that or not remains to be seen.”
The end of the war in Afghanistan is a part of Biden’s legacy as president – but hardly its totality
Ronald Reagan was scorched in the Iran-Contra crisis and the deaths of 241 Marines in a terrorist truck bomb attack in Beirut.
Obama was hit hard by fallout from Libya and Syria as was Gerald Ford in the fall of Saigon. But that is not what their presidencies are principally remembered for. Other presidents were defined by historic foreign policy failures: Jimmy Carter and the hostages held by Iran, Lyndon Johnson and the Vietnam War, George W Bush and Iraq.
This is because nothing matters more than passing the domestic policy agenda
At home, and for what Biden wants to deliver to the American people, it simply does not matter, as long as Democrats in Congress are united, whether Biden lost political capital because of Afghanistan — because nothing matters more than passing the domestic policy agenda. The past two weeks in Afghanistan have no bearing on the vote on any Democrats on Biden’s domestic initiatives. And they hold the power to enact it.
If they fail to execute this year on a Biden agenda they strongly support, they will suffer truly immense political losses in the midterm elections next year. That, and not Afghanistan, is what will define Biden’s legacy – and theirs.
Ukraine faces tough choices amid U.S.-Russia secret peace plan negotiations, potentially demanding significant concessions from Kyiv
>
In Short:
– Ukraine faces challenges with a U.S.-Russia peace plan requiring major concessions to Moscow.
– Senior U.S. officials are in Ukraine discussing conflict resolution amid concerns over Ukrainian input.
Ukraine faces challenges amid reports of a U.S.-Russia peace plan to end the war, potentially involving major concessions to Moscow.Senior U.S. military officials are currently in Ukraine for discussions aimed at ending the conflict. The visit follows reports suggesting that Washington and Moscow developed a 28-point peace plan without Ukrainian input.
The plan reportedly includes territorial concessions in eastern Donbas, limitations on Ukraine’s military capabilities, and a substantial reduction in armed forces. Some reports suggest that Russia could control the Donbas while Ukraine retains legal ownership, with payment arrangements in place, but these claims remain unverified.
A senior Ukrainian official indicated that Kyiv received signals regarding U.S. proposals but was not involved in their formulation. The Kremlin has denied any new developments in peace talks since President Putin and President Trump last met.
The White House has not confirmed the existence of the peace plan but acknowledged that new proposals are being explored. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that achieving peace necessitates difficult concessions from both sides.
Ukraine’s Options
Ukraine has not responded publicly to the peace plan but anticipates discussions with U.S. officials. President Zelenskyy noted that the U.S. plays a crucial role in resolving the conflict.
Despite Ukrainian concerns, the country remains reliant on U.S. military aid, with European support becoming less immediate. European officials have expressed dissatisfaction over peace proposals that do not involve Ukrainian input, noting it is essential for any viable plan.
Analysts have warned that the proposed plan may signify Ukraine’s capitulation, undermining its defensive positions and inviting further Russian aggression.
US job growth slows as unemployment rises to 4.4%, amid economic uncertainty and impact of artificial intelligence on labour market
In Short:
– U.S. employment growth quickened in September, but unemployment rose to 4.4%, the highest since 2019.
– Job gains were led by healthcare and leisure, while transportation, warehousing, and government jobs declined.
U.S. employment growth accelerated in September, although the labor market struggled to keep up with new job-seekers due to challenges such as import tariffs and the integration of artificial intelligence in roles.The unemployment rate rose to 4.4%, its highest in four years, from 4.3% in August, according to the Labor Department. Revised payroll data indicated that jobs were shed in August, highlighting ongoing labor market softness.
Layoffs remained low in mid-November, indicative of a “no-hire, no-fire” condition in the job market. Some economists believe the rise in unemployment supports a Federal Reserve interest rate cut, while others argue in favour of maintaining rates due to the surprising job growth.
Nonfarm payrolls increased by 119,000 jobs after a revised decrease in August. Economists had previously forecasted a much lower job addition. The report’s release was delayed due to a federal government shutdown.
Stock markets in Wall Street experienced declines, while the dollar remained steady against various currencies. Job gains were influenced by seasonal adjustments in sectors like leisure and hospitality.
Job Sector Trends
Healthcare employment led growth with 43,000 new jobs, while the leisure sector added 47,000. Conversely, transportation and warehousing lost over 25,000 positions, with manufacturing shedding 6,000.
The federal workforce decreased by 3,000 jobs, part of a larger trend of declining employment in government positions. Despite momentum loss, labor participation rose, impacting the unemployment rate dynamics positively.
US pressures Ukraine to accept a peace plan risking territory loss amid ongoing conflict with Russia.
The United States is pressuring Ukraine to accept a peace plan that would see the country surrender territory and military equipment as part of a negotiated settlement with Russia. The proposal has sparked concern within Kyiv over the potential loss of sovereignty and long-term security.
President Volodymyr Zelenskiy is in Turkey discussing this plan, which may also involve cuts to Ukraine’s armed forces. His visit comes as Washington intensifies efforts under the Trump administration to secure an end to the conflict, despite fears the terms could undermine Ukraine’s national interests.
As Russian forces continue their aggressive campaign, holding roughly 19% of Ukrainian territory, Zelenskiy is attempting to revive peace talks before winter further complicates the frontline. The stakes remain high as the geopolitical landscape shifts.
Subscribe to never miss an episode of Ticker – https://www.youtube.com/@weareticker