Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

Ticker Views

Why insider risk management should be a priority in 2025

Insider threats are rising—here’s why businesses must prioritise insider risk management in 2025.

Published

on

Insider threats are rising—here’s why businesses must prioritise insider risk management in 2025.

You know that feeling when you accidentally send a wrong email to your colleague? We’ve all been there! I recently had my own awkward moment when I sent a wink emoji in a professional email that definitely should not have had one. While these small slip-ups might just cause momentary embarrassment, they highlight a much bigger concern: insider risk management.

Insiders – employees, vendors, or partners – open risks to organisations. Whether accidental or malicious misuse of sensitive information, insider incidents can result in financial losses, regulatory fines, intellectual property theft, or damage to a business’ reputation. Forrester’s recent Security Survey finds that 22% of data breaches are caused by internal incidents.

I had the pleasure of interviewing Joanne Klein, CEO of NexNovus (the saying ‘don’t meet your hero’ is WRONG in this case!). Joanne really opened my eyes to just how crucial this topic has become. While my email faux pas might seem trivial, the real scope of insider risks is far more serious and potentially devastating for organizations.

The Digital Tsunami We’re Facing

Think about all the ways we share information in today’s workplace: emails with sensitive attachments, SharePoint and OneDrive document sharing, Teams chats containing personal information, and quick file transfers that might seem harmless in the moment.

Joanne explains, “As that digital footprint grows, so do the data risks that go along with that.” Microsoft reported that SharePoint and OneDrive alone see an additional 2 million files uploaded every minute. Yes, you read that right — every minute! It’s like trying to keep track of every grain of sand on a beach as additional truckloads of sand are being dumped in the same place.

What Exactly is Insider Risk Management?

Gartner defines insider risk management as tools and capabilities that measure, detect, and contain undesirable behavior of trusted accounts in the organization. It includes solutions that monitor the behavior of employees, service partners, and key suppliers working inside the organization. These tools then evaluate whether behavior falls within the expectations of the role and corporate risk tolerance.

Joanne adds that it is about “balancing the need to monitor activities while balancing user privacy and organizational risk.” We’re looking to find, mitigate, and, hopefully, stop altogether security threats from people within an organization to maintain an ethical working environment.

But here’s what I found particularly interesting, because it’s often missing by organizations: successful insider risk management isn’t just about implementing sophisticated tools — it’s about building trust with your employees.

WATCH THE TECH EDGE HERE

The Human Element: Trust Goes Both Ways

Employees can be a little uneasy with this type of monitoring solution, so the best practice is to be transparent about what the company is doing while ensuring proper privacy controls are in place. Modern tools use anonymization techniques so investigators or admins can assess risky activities without knowing who’s involved, also removing personal bias from the equation.

But it’s really a two-way street where companies should also expect their employees to meet the requirements to secure their data and information. One of the most common scenarios is a departing employee. There’s often confusion about who owns the content created during employment, and some folks might feel entitled to take their work with them by downloading confidential information and saving it in personal devices emailing out documents — it doesn’t quite work that way!

How Serious Can It Get?

In May 2023, Tesla’s massive data breach served as a wake-up call where two former employees leaked nearly 100 gigabytes of confidential documents. We’re talking about personal information of more than 75,000 people, customer files from 2015 to 2022, and production secrets. What are the consequences of this insider’s wrongdoing? They range from lawsuits to penalties that severely damage the brand’s confidence and its bottom line.

An organization’s data is really one of its most valuable assets, so protecting it and preventing its loss is a top priority. However, the challenge is the limited resources that companies have nowadays. Admins will not be able to detect, monitor, and take appropriate actions given the massive growth in the digital footprint. It’s like asking them to do more with less.

Chief information security officers (CISOs) and cybersecurity leaders emphasize the importance of an integrated approach combining preventive controls, human risk management, detection and investigation, and incident response. Policies, guidelines, and investigative work that are outside the bounds of a typical cybersecurity scope are components of insider risk management. Effectively mitigating insider risks requires collaboration among many cross-functional stakeholders — treating it more as a human problem rather than a technical issue.

WATCH THE TECH EDGE HERE

3 Recommendations for Intelligent Risk Management Solutions

  1. Implement automated monitoring with privacy controls. Why? Because manual checking of audit logs is like trying to count raindrops in a storm. Automated tools can continuously assess data-related activities and adapt to changing conditions. For instance, when an employee submits their resignation, the system can automatically elevate their risk level and adjust monitoring accordingly. This saves your admins time while ensuring nothing slips through the cracks.
  2. Establish a comprehensive employee training program. The reasoning is simple: your employees are both your first and last line of defense. Start with thorough onboarding processes and implement regular attestations. Make data handling guidelines clear and part of your corporate culture. Joanne also pointed out, “Most employees definitely want to do the right thing,” so give them the tools and knowledge to do so. This isn’t just about rules — it’s about creating a culture of security awareness.
  3. Create clear data classification systems. Here’s why these matters: not all data is created equal. You need to be able to distinguish between confidential information and general documentation. Implement a clear system for classifying documents and setting appropriate monitoring levels for each category. This helps prevent both accidental sharing of sensitive information and deliberate data exfiltration. Remembering Joanne’s point: “It’s really important to be able to discern what’s confidential versus what’s just benign.”

Key Takeaways

Insider risk management isn’t just an IT issue, it’s a business survival issue. While we can laugh about accidental emoji slip-ups, the real risks lurking in our digital interactions are no laughing matter. By implementing these recommendations, you’re not just protecting your organization’s data; you’re building a foundation of trust and security that benefits everyone.

Alyssa Blackburn is the Director of Records & Information Strategy  at AvePoint

Continue Reading

Ticker Views

First Xi, now Trump: tariff impacts on the Australian economy

Published

on

First, the tariffs from China hit Australian exporters now it’s the Trump tariffs on steel and aluminium – and as we have just learnt there will be no exemption.

How will these measures affect the USA, but also China, Australia and the rest of the global economy?

Like the China COVID tariffs, the Trump tariffs will hurt Australian workers. 

After all, 1 in 5 Australian workers depend on exporters and exporters pay 60 per cent higher wages on average than non-exporters in union jobs with EBAs. This will be bad for the steel workers of the Illawarra and the aluminium workers of Portland, and will also be inflationary, and put upward pressure on interest rates. That’s why we have seen the impact of tariff decisions (and tariff uncertainty) hitting the Australian share market and superannuation balances.

As a former Australian Prime Minister, could Ambassador Kevin Rudd got an exemption? I am sure he’s trying. But his pre-election comments disparaging Trump have not helped Australia’s interests not have the recent comments of another former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull. But to be fair, both Rudd and Turnbull have also been critical of Beijing. 

Of course, Australia is not alone. The USA’s North America closet trading partner, Canada is in the same boat, as is Mexico. Canada has just had a leadership election with former Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney (who was also Bank of England Governor) taking over as Prime Minister of Canada from Justin Trudeau. The Canadian Tories led by Pierre Poilievre are going to paint Carney as a Globalist, more comfortable in Switzerland than Saskatoon, but the tariffs on Canada give the new Prime Minister a chance to wrap himself in the Maple Leaf and fight the Trump tariffs. Carney can also paint Poilievre as Trump lite, and improve the Liberals chances in a contest suffering from the unpopularity of Trudeau. When a central banker can replaced a charismatic second-generation politician as Prime Minister and have a better chance we know we are living in interesting times. 

With China and the USA unreliable trade partners, what options does Australia have? The Albanese Labor Government, to their credit have improved relations with our North East Asian trading partners like Japan and South Korea, Taiwan, ASEAN (with the special Australia ASEAN summit in Melbourne last year) as well as Europe and the emerging markets of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and Latin America.

We could actually get closer to Canada under their new Prime Minister, given our similar economic and political backgrounds (if not geography) and current situation on steel and aluminium tariffs. Canada has also had its issues with Beijing as well as Washington.

So forget the tyranny of distance, and May the Moose be with you.

Professor Tim Harcourt is the Chief Economist of IPPG at University of Technology Sydney (UTS) and host of The Airport Economist on Ticker.

Tim is also former chief economist of the Australian Trade Commission (AUSTRADE), the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) and the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA).

Continue Reading

Ticker Views

Australia’s million-dollar suburb boom: The next hotspots for investors

Published

on

Since the start of the pandemic in 2020, many of Australia’s property markets have experienced some extraordinary price growth.

Many locations, both city-based and regional, achieved unprecedented price increases with median house and unit prices soaring as demand hit new highs. Where once a million-dollar house or unit median was unusual, that recent growth has launched many locations into that club for the first time.

As of January 2025, there were 1,194 suburbs or towns with a median house price or median unit price of $1 million or more – 50 more than in September 2024.

These figures show that although price growth may have eased in some locations in the past six months, the number of million-dollar markets continues to increase throughout Australia.

And there are still plenty of opportunities for investors to find markets that are set to tip over into million-dollar markets in 2025.

The latest Hotspotting and Propertybuyer, National Million Dollar Hotspots report shows there are plenty of markets teetering on the edge of a million-dollar median.

They are the markets where price growth has been steady in recent years and demand remains strong. ith that trajectory set to continue, these markets will soon breach the million-dollar barrier.

They are also strong markets for investors, where rents have been rising, yields are solid and vacancy rates are low.

Residential properties line the Sydney suburb of Birchgrove in Australia.

WATCH THE PROPERTY PLAYBOOK NOW

Million-dollar median

There is a distinct lure to investing in a suburb with a million-dollar median and it’s not just the prestige of the price tag. The magic of buying in a million-dollar suburb is its capital growth potential.

By reaching a million-dollar median, it’s already proven to be a desirable location where owner-occupiers and investors are prepared to pay top dollar to secure a piece of the action.

There are plenty of inner-city markets throughout Australia which already have million-dollar medians, but successful investors are those who find locations where prices aren’t just rising, but the fundamentals and amenities are in place to ensure ongoing solid price growth and increasing demand for properties in the suburb.

It’s essential when considering a million-dollar location to invest in that it meets a variety of criteria, not just price point. There needs to be ongoing demand for property and significant amenities to meet community needs, such as public transport, shops, schools and recreation spaces, whether that be beaches, parks or lakes.

WATCH THE PROPERTY PLAYBOOK NOW

Employment opportunities

Infrastructure spending is also important, as is solid population growth and access to good local employment opportunities. These are factors that will keep buyers returning time and again to these suburbs and increased buyer demand is what will keep prices increasing to $1 million and beyond.

Southport on the Gold Coast is a good example of this. Within less than six months, the median house price in Southport, which was a selection in our October 2024 report, has breached the $1 million median mark.

It had a median house price of around $970,000 in September 2024, which hit $1.04 million in February 2025 – that’s a rise of $70,000 in just five months.

The suburb has achieved 15% median house price growth in the 12 months to February 2025 – and is an example of what can be achieved in the Million Dollar Hotspots.

Terry Ryder is the Managing Director of HotSpotting

Continue Reading

Ticker Views

A fractured U.S.-Ukraine alliance signals trouble for the West

Published

on

In a scene that could have been scripted in the Kremlin, the Oval Office clash between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has laid bare a troubling fracture in U.S. foreign policy—one that Russian President Vladimir Putin is all too eager to exploit. 

What unfolded last week was not merely a diplomatic misstep but a stark illustration of how domestic bravado and miscalculation can undermine America’s standing on the world stage, tilting the balance of power toward Moscow at a pivotal moment.

The meeting, initially framed as a chance to solidify U.S.-Ukrainian ties through a potential minerals deal, devolved into a public reprimand of Zelensky, orchestrated with alarming precision by Vice President JD Vance and endorsed by Trump.

Vance’s remarks – dismissing Ukraine’s war effort and deriding diplomatic outreach as “propaganda” – set the stage for Trump to send Zelensky packing, empty-handed and humiliated. The fallout is a geopolitical gift to Putin, who now watches as the United States risks squandering its leverage in a conflict that tests the resilience of the Western alliance.

Bruised egos

This episode is more than a tale of bruised egos; it is a warning of the broader unraveling of U.S. – Russia relations at a time when strategic clarity is paramount. For decades, the United States has positioned itself as a bulwark against Russian expansionism, a role that has demanded both resolve and finesse.

Ukraine, locked in a brutal struggle for survival since Russia’s 2022 invasion, has been the frontline of that effort – a democratic nation fighting not just for itself but for the principle that borders cannot be redrawn by force.

Yet, in one ill-fated meeting, the Trump administration signaled a retreat from that commitment, handing Putin a propaganda coup and a tactical advantage.

The implications ripple far beyond Kyiv. Putin’s ambitions have never been confined to Ukraine; they extend to reasserting Russian dominance over its former sphere of influence and weakening NATO’s cohesion. A faltering U.S. commitment to Ukraine emboldens the Kremlin to press its advantage, not only on the battlefield but in the broader contest for global influence.

Staggering losses

With Russia’s incremental gains in eastern Ukraine and its willingness to endure staggering losses, Putin has wagered that time is on his side – a bet that Friday’s debacle only reinforces.

The administration’s defenders might argue that Trump seeks to disentangle the United States from a costly foreign conflict, a sentiment that resonates with a war-weary American public. But the reality of great power rivalry offers no such luxury.

Putin does not view negotiations as a path to compromise but as a tool to consolidate gains. The notion that he can be strong-armed into a settlement overlooks his track record of patience and ruthlessness.

By alienating Ukraine, Trump has not simplified the chessboard – he has ceded key pieces to his adversary.

Ahron Young is Ticker’s Founder and Managing Editor.

Continue Reading

Trending Now