When U.S. President Joe Biden said Russia will invade Ukraine on 19 January, he was playing a tight game of diplomatic chess
The President cautioned his Russian counterpart, saying that President Vladimir Putin “will regret having done it”.
It was a somewhat bold move for Mr Biden, who is trying to reassert the U.S.’ dominance in foreign policy following President Donald Trump’s tenure.
Russia has amassed around 100,000 troops along its border with Ukraine in recent months.
President Putin has put together several requests for the U.S. before he considers drawing his forces back.
These requests include a ban on Ukraine joining NATO, and for the North Atlantic Alliance to remove its troops across eastern Europe—areas that were formerly part of the Soviet Union.
What are the consequences?
The U.S. has been very clear: if Russia invades Ukraine, there will be “serious” personal sanctions against President Putin.
“There are going to be serious economic consequences if he moves.”
U.S. PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN
The U.S. President hasn’t minced his words. In fact, he believes “it would be the largest invasion since World War II”, and it would “change the world” if Russia entered its sovereign neighbour.
U.S. President Joe Biden speaks with European leaders in response to Russia’s military buildup.
The U.S. has put 8,5000 troops on alert amid fears of an invasion. Of course, armed forces are always on alert, so this may just be symbolic of the U.S.’ commitment to NATO.
But U.S. Republican Oz Sultan told Ticker NEWS the President has been “heavy fisted in his response”, to the escalating tensions.
“The challenge that you have is Russia has seen Ukraine joining NATO as a threat.”
REPUBLICAN OZ SULTAN
The European Commission is also on board. Ticker NEWS spoke with Peter Stano, who is the lead spokesperson for external affairs. He says “we are strongly united and determined to react to any further aggression with massive, massive measures that would have inflict a huge cost on the aggressor’s consequences.”
Russia recently responded to the U.S.’ stance on the issue. A spokesperson for Mr Putin, Dmitry Peskov, believes such sanctions would not be “painful” for the President.
He says the sanctions would be “politically destructive”.
Peter Stano believes military action is “outdated” in 21st Century Europe. Instead, he believes economic sanctions are the way forward.
Tensions in this part of the world are hardly new. In fact, conflict peaked in 2014 when protesters ousted Ukraine’s pro-Russian president, Viktor Yanukovych.
At the same time, Russia annexed Crimea—an area largely made up of ethnic Russians.
Then, Mr Putin moved to strike in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine. Over 14,000 people have lost their lives in the armed conflict.
How does Ukraine feel about this?
Between the U.S. and Russia—two of the world’s biggest superpowers, Ukraine feels like the forgotten child in this latest fiasco.
The nation is home to over 44 million people. A 2020 survey found 81 per cent of Ukrainians had a negative attitude of Mr Putin.
But its residents appear relatively calm at the moment.
Ukraine’s Foreign Minister does not think there are systems in place for a “full-scale offensive”.
Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba isn’t overly concerned about the number of troops on the border either. He says “their number is now insufficient for a large-scale offensive”.
“They are still missing some key military elements and systems to mount a big, full-scale offensive.”
UKRAINE’S FOREIGN MINISTER DMYTRO KULEBA
Russia, Ukraine, France and Germany met in Paris this week to discuss the conflict. There were no breakthroughs but the Normandy-style gathering agreed to meet again in two weeks.
What is Russia’s motivation behind this?
President Putin is afraid of democracy. The leader sensationally changed his nation’s constitution in 2020, which allows him to remain in power until 2036.
Mr Putin’s ‘buffer states’ mentality has granted Russia geographic separatism from the European Union in the West.
It’s the same reason why Mr Putin is scared of Opposition Leader Alexei Navalny, who was added to Russia’s ‘terrorist list’ this week.
“Nalvany’s one man with a small operation but that represents democracy to him and Putin is really afraid of democracy.”
Dr carol saivetz, harvard university
Russia has consistently denied any intention of invading Ukraine. It would be highly frowned upon by the international community if that promise was broken.
“They {Russia] know that the Ukraine Government is pushing hard for membership of NATO and that, in their view, would complete this extraordinary push of NATO’s membership from central Europe right across to Russia’s borders,” Professor Joseph Camilleri from La Trobe University says.
Professor Camilleri told Ticker NEWS he doesn’t think an incursion will occur. Instead, he believes Russia considers the U.S. as an “adversary that will never redeem itself”.
It could be a strategic gambit for Russia, or the nation could be playing with fire.
Why does the U.S. want to get involved?
It feels like Cold-War era power play is at the heart of this. So why does the U.S. want to get involved in another conflict on another continent?
The U.S. is a founding member of NATO, which contributes thousands of active personnel across Europe.
European NATO members are currently spending 2 per cent of GDP on defence by 2024. The U.S. has previously pushed for more under President Trump.
But unlike Mr Putin, the U.S. is a big supporter of democracy—something that was came to life at Mr Biden’s Summit for Democracy.
The U.S. wants to fight for democracy. President Biden describes it as “the defining challenge of our time”.
As such, the U.S. sees the Russia-Ukraine conflict as critical to meeting those objectives. Importantly, the U.S. has zero NATO obligations to Ukraine so it’s hard to imagine a large military presence on the ground fighting Russia.
With economic sanctions for Russia, and a red-faced U.S. all on the table. It appears like this conflict may end in checkmate sooner than expected.
Costa is a news producer at ticker NEWS. He has previously worked as a regional journalist at the Southern Highlands Express newspaper. He also has several years' experience in the fire and emergency services sector, where he has worked with researchers, policymakers and local communities. He has also worked at the Seven Network during their Olympic Games coverage and in the ABC Melbourne newsroom.
He also holds a Bachelor of Arts (Professional), with expertise in journalism, politics and international relations. His other interests include colonial legacies in the Pacific, counter-terrorism, aviation and travel.
Protests in Iran escalate as citizens demand women’s rights; Rabbi Cooper discusses global solidarity and advocacy efforts.
Amid escalating protests in Iran, citizens are risking everything to demand women’s rights and basic freedoms. The world watches as these demonstrations grow, with many hoping for meaningful change in the face of a brutal regime.
We speak with Rabbi Abraham Cooper from the Simon Wiesenthal Center about the advocacy work supporting Iranian voices and the historical context of defending human rights. He explains the vital role of international solidarity and how governments and communities can respond.
From the human cost on the ground to the influence of the Iranian diaspora in Los Angeles, this interview sheds light on the stakes, the movement, and why public attention is critical.
Subscribe to never miss an episode of Ticker – https://www.youtube.com/@weareticker
Greenland, Denmark assert Arctic island not for sale, emphasizing cooperation with the US on their own terms.
Greenland and Denmark have used high-level talks in Washington, D.C. to firmly restate that the Arctic island is not for sale, pushing back against long-standing US interest in the strategically vital territory.
Foreign ministers from both Greenland and Denmark acknowledged that major disagreements remain following discussions with US officials, despite what they described as constructive engagement on shared priorities.
Greenland’s government made clear it is open to closer cooperation with Washington, but only on its own terms, rejecting any suggestion of ownership or control.
Subscribe to never miss an episode of Ticker – https://www.youtube.com/@weareticker
US military relocates personnel from Qatar amid rising Iran tensions; Trump considers military action as regional stability wanes.
The US military is moving personnel from Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar as tensions rise between Washington and Tehran, signalling heightened concern over regional stability.
President Trump has indicated he may consider military action against Iran, while the Pentagon says it remains ready to defend US forces using alternative options despite limited naval assets in the region.
The developments come amid growing uncertainty in the Middle East, with officials closely monitoring the risk of further escalation.
Subscribe to never miss an episode of Ticker – https://www.youtube.com/@weareticker