Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

News

Don’t mess with Texas | ticker VIEWS

Published

on

They say “don’t mess with Texas”, but how about when Texas is messing with the U.S?

The two most potent threats to two of the most important constitutional rights – a woman’s right to choose whether or not to bear a child, and the rights of all citizens to vote – are coming from Texas. 

What’s happening in Texas is on the brink of sweeping across the country.

Both issues are at the heart of the political culture of the Democratic Party and its supporters

The right to choose and the right to vote are bedrock beliefs to Democratic voters and Democrats elected to Congress.  They also have wide appeal to independent swing voters, especially in America’s suburbs.  

And both issues are hitting a brick wall in the United States Senate.

The constitutional right to an abortion was established by the Supreme Court in Roe v Wade in 1973. 

The Court held in Roe and subsequent cases that a woman has a right to terminate a pregnancy without undue burdens imposed by the state until the fetus is viable, which is generally placed at 24-28 weeks.

The right to vote without discrimination on the basis of race, colour or previous servitude was enshrined after the Civil War, and further protected by landmark voting rights legislation in the 1960s.

Over the past fortnight, Texas has taken double-barrel aim at both

On abortion, the new Texas law forbids abortions when cardiac activity is detected, which medical experts say is at about 6 weeks of pregnancy, with no exception for pregnancy resulting from rape or incest. 

It also provides, in enforcement of the abortion ban, that any citizen, anywhere in the United States, can sue any abortion provider in Texas, or anyone who assists or facilitates provision of an illegal abortion.  (And a bonus: if your anti-abortion lawsuit is successful, you are awarded a bounty of $10,000.)

It is this Texas law that the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision last week – reflecting Trump’s success in ensuring a solid anti-abortion majority on the court — refused to set aside by issuing an emergency stay to provide orderly argument in the lower courts on whether this new law is constitutional under Roe.

As a result, this law is now in effect in Texas.

Women needing an abortion will have to go to another state where it is legal – if they can.

On voting rights, the Texas legislature joined 14 other US states that have already enacted 30 bills this year to restrict voting further. 

It severely limits absentee voting, and places severe impediments on early voting and mail-in voting. 

The genesis of all this legislation is Trump’s call for the states to prevent the “stealing” of his election – which did not happen – from ever “happening” again. 

The key tactic is to make it harder than ever for poorer, less educated, less affluent voters, and especially voters of colour, from casting their votes

Trump won Texas handily last November, but that clean win wasn’t good enough for Texas Republicans to future proof Texas against dramatically changing demographics. 

Texas is a majority-minority state, with the white population at 40 per cent.

Trump won 52 per cent of the vote in Texas last year, and Republicans hold 55 per cent of the state legislature’s assembly seats and 63 per cent of their US House of Representatives congressional delegation.

No matter: time to protect Republicans even more in a state where they are politically dominant

What’s happening in Texas – the rawest exercise of radical conservatism – may well stick for much of the country. 

The highest institutions of government in the United States are on the verge of failing to protect these fundamental constitutional rights:

  • The Supreme Court will hear and rule on a Mississippi law – which has been stayed pending this case being heard – that bans abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. This case will decide the fate of much of the new Texas statute. The five justices who refused to temporarily halt the extreme Texas law must be seen as likely to overturn Roe and allow states to be ever more restrictive on abortion.  14 states with Republican legislatures and governors have already enacted new abortion restrictions and Florida is poised to join them.  This will mean that the 35% of American women who live in these states will not have the same access to abortion as other American women.
  • Congress will not be able to resolve these issues.  On abortion, House Speaker Pelosi has announced the House will vote on legislation to codify Roe and make access to abortion available on equal terms across the country. While this is politically popular – polling regularly shows that over 60% of the country supports legal access to abortion – there are no Republicans in the House who will vote for abortion.  Similarly, the House has passed massive voting rights legislation, but the Senate’s filibuster, which requires a supermajority of 60 votes to pass it – or 10 Republicans to cross the floor – killed it.  The same fate awaits any abortion rights bill that passes the House.

These are severe outcomes, with no easy remedy. 

Texans are fond of saying, “Don’t mess with Texas.” But Texas is messing with America’s democracy and plunging the country into a political and constitutional crisis. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Victoria’s Secret criticized for trans woman’s apology

Published

on

Victoria’s Secret is facing backlash after issuing an apology to a transgender woman who had a negative experience while trying on bras at one of their stores.

The incident has ignited a debate about inclusivity and sensitivity in the fashion industry.

The controversy began when the trans woman, who remains anonymous, visited a Victoria’s Secret store to shop for bras. She reported feeling uncomfortable and discriminated against by store staff.

In response to her complaint, Victoria’s Secret issued an apology, acknowledging the incident and expressing their commitment to diversity and inclusion.

However, the apology itself has come under fire from both supporters and critics.

Some argue that the brand’s apology is insincere and merely an attempt to save face, while others believe it is a step in the right direction towards a more inclusive shopping experience for all customers.

The incident raises important questions about how brands should handle situations involving discrimination and whether their apologies are genuine or performative.

It also highlights the ongoing challenges faced by transgender individuals when accessing spaces traditionally designed for cisgender customers.

As the fashion industry continues to evolve, many are calling for a deeper examination of inclusivity and sensitivity, not just in policies but in practice.

Continue Reading

News

Has the Australian Defence Force become top heavy?

Published

on

Despite a decrease in overall personnel numbers, the Australian Defence Force (ADF) has seen a notable increase in senior officers, leading to concerns about its top-heavy structure.

In recent years, the ADF has undergone significant downsizing efforts, resulting in a reduced total workforce.

However, a closer look at the numbers reveals a surprising trend – a growing number of senior officers within the organization.

The rise in senior officers has raised questions about the efficiency and effectiveness of the ADF’s hierarchy.

Critics argue that a top-heavy structure may hinder decision-making and resource allocation, potentially impacting the ADF’s operational capabilities.

Is the increase in senior officers a deliberate strategy, or is it the result of unintended consequences from downsizing efforts?

What implications does a top-heavy structure have on the ADF’s ability to respond to evolving security challenges?

Are there plans to rebalance the officer-to-enlisted personnel ratio within the ADF?

Continue Reading

News

India’s shift to coal amid declining hydro generation

Published

on

India has been grappling with a significant challenge in its energy sector as hydroelectric power generation has experienced a sharp decline.

This shift in the energy landscape has forced the nation to increasingly turn to coal as an alternative source of power.

The dwindling water resources and changing weather patterns have led to a decrease in hydro generation, posing a pressing dilemma for the country’s energy sustainability.

With India’s growing population and expanding industries, a steady and reliable power supply is crucial.

However, the drop in hydroelectric power output due to factors like reduced rainfall and glacial melting has strained the nation’s electricity grid.

As a result, coal-fired power plants have become a more prevalent choice to bridge the energy gap, despite concerns about environmental impact and carbon emissions.

Continue Reading
Live Watch Ticker News Live
Advertisement

Trending Now

Copyright © 2023 The Ticker Company