Putin has overseen his country conducting its first nuclear drills, since the beginning of the war
Russia’s Vladimir Putin watched on from afar as his country launched the ballistic and cruise missiles fired from the Arctic towards Russia’s far-east.
Sergei Shoigu, Russia’s Defence Minister, spoke about the drills on national TV. He claims the exercises were an opportunity for the military to practise retaliation of an enemy strike.
During the broadcast Putin also made claims about Ukraine being a “testing ground for military biological experiments”.
When it comes to the recent drills, the Kremlin warned the west and therefore complied with the arms control treaty.
However, the drills come at a time of increasing tensions between Russia and western nations.
As the west monitors Russia’s nuclear posture closely, NATO gets set to run its own nuclear drills, dubbed ‘Steadfast Noon’ which will launch late October.
U.S. warning
The United States has consistently warned Russia against using nuclear force during the war in Ukraine.
Today, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken again reiterated the consequences for Russia if it uses a nuclear weapon.
Speaking exclusively on CNN, Russia’s Ambassador to the UK insists Russia is “not going to use nukes” in the war.
India condemn’s nuclear
Amid heightened tensions in Ukraine, the threat of resorting to nuclear has become a core concern for the war ahead.
As Ukrainian troops continue to make advances on the frontline, there are fears Putin will use nuclear force when backed into a corner.
Although, Russia has conducted planned nuclear drills, the country’s nuclear posture has not changed in any way.
During a phone call, India’s Defence Minister warned his Russian counterpart against nuclear weapons.
A statement released by the Defence Minister’s office confirmed Rajnath Singh “reiterated India’s position on the need to pursue the path of dialogue and diplomacy for an early resolution of the conflict. He pointed out that the nuclear option should not be resorted to by any side as the prospect of the usage of nuclear or radiological weapons goes against the basic tenets of humanity.”
Dirty bomb allegations
Russia has made claims that Ukraine is planning to use a so-called “dirty bomb,” comprising of explosives and Uranium.
Claims Ukraine and the west have strongly denied and condemned. Now, many western nations are concerned Russia is going to use this allegation as a pretext to escalate the war.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg labelled the claims as “transparently false.”
Stoltenberg has warned Putin against using a nuclear weapon, explaining that the use of nuclear would change the front of the war for everyone, including Russia.
However, despite global condemnation and denial, Russia still insists Ukraine is going to use a “dirty bomb.”
Speaking on CNN, Russia’s Ambassador to the UK also doubled down on claims of Ukraine using a ‘dirty bomb’ saying Russia ‘has a feeling.’
Rupert Murdoch’s attempt to change the family trust to consolidate control under his son Lachlan has been rejected by a Nevada commissioner.
The ruling, made by Commissioner Edmund J. Gorman Jr., stated that Murdoch and Lachlan acted in “bad faith” while trying to amend the irrevocable trust, which divides control equally among Murdoch’s four oldest children.
The 96-page opinion characterised the plan as a “carefully crafted charade” intended to secure Lachlan’s executive roles unconditionally.
Murdoch’s lawyer expressed disappointment and plans to appeal the ruling.
FILE PHOTO: Media mogul Rupert Murdoch poses for a photograph with his sons Lachlan and James in London.
Media empire
This dispute is critical as it affects the future control of Murdoch’s media empire, which includes Fox News and other major outlets.
While the intention was not to diminish financial stakes, the ruling reflects deep family tensions, especially given differing political views among the siblings.
The commissioner noted Lachlan initiated the proposed changes, created a plan dubbed “Project Family Harmony,” and labeled James as a “troublesome beneficiary.”
Despite Lachlan and Rupert’s efforts, the attempt to marginalise James was deemed insufficiently justified by the court.
Murdoch’s family trust, established in 2006, retains his control until his death, and includes provisions allowing amendments.
However, the commissioner found that Murdoch and Lachlan’s actions were not supporting their siblings’ best interests.
The ruling is not final and may be contested further in court.
Syrian rebels ousted Bashar Assad after a 13-year civil war, prompting a shift in the region’s dynamics that presents risks and opportunities for the US.
President Biden acknowledged Assad’s removal as a historic opportunity, signaling the need for careful US engagement to avoid chaos in Syria.
Experts highlight this change as a chance to weaken Iran’s regional influence, as the overthrow of Assad hinders Iran’s strategic interests.
The US has had limited involvement in Syria, focusing mainly on combating ISIS, which complicates its response to the new power vacuum.
Did Iraq become a flourishing democracy post-Saddam. How about Afghanistan post-Taliban. How about Libya post-Gaddafi. I’m sure Syria post-Assad will be a successful regime change operation.
20 straight years of this stuff and people still don’t get it.
Expectations suggest a low-level US campaign against ISIS will continue until a stable government is established, with efforts to maintain order and support allies.
The end of Assad’s rule has opened a security vacuum that extremist groups may exploit, further jeopardizing the humanitarian situation.
Iran and Russia also seek to reassert their influence following Assad’s departure, which could lead to competition for power among various factions.
Key figures, including the leader of Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham, Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, may vie for control in the power vacuum, raising concerns given the group’s past affiliations with terrorism.
Washington faces the challenge of engaging with groups like HTS while avoiding further destabilization.
ByteDance and TikTok have requested a temporary court order to block a U.S. law requiring ByteDance to divest TikTok by January 19.
They filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
The companies warned that the law would shut down TikTok, affecting over 170 million U.S. users.
Without this injunction, TikTok faces a possible ban in six weeks, significantly diminishing its value and hurting businesses reliant on the app.
A three-judge panel recently upheld the law, mandating the divestiture.
The companies argue the likelihood of a Supreme Court reversal justifies a pause for further deliberation.
Additional time
They also pointed to President-elect Donald Trump’s opposition to a ban, suggesting additional time could help resolve the issue without Supreme Court intervention.
The Justice Department has indicated the appeals court should deny the request promptly for a timely Supreme Court review.
TikTok requested a decision by December 16, noting that the next actions depend on President Biden, who could extend the deadline, and Trump, who assumes office on January 20.
The feasibility of ByteDance demonstrating significant progress on divestiture remains uncertain.
Trump’s incoming national security adviser expressed his commitment to protecting user access to TikTok while ensuring data security.