Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

Ticker Views

‘Keep fighting’ – A message to millennials about climate change | ticker VIEWS

Published

on

Former Australian Minister for climate change, Greg Combet, is urging younger generations to “keep fighting” against climate change

Greg Combet is a Trade Unionist, former Minister for Climate Change, Industry, and Innovation in the Julia Gillard Government.

Now, Combet is the Chair of Industry Super Funds. Industry Super Funds represents sixteen of Australia’s biggest industry funds and the bulk of the $630 billion industry superannuation sector.

In this week’s episode of Ticker Climate, we discuss climate policy, carbon targets, carbon tariffs, and the risks for Australia’s billion dollars Industry Super Funds.

Glasgow Climate Conference is looming

The ‘COP 26’ UN Climate Change Conference is hosted by the UK in partnership with Italy. It will take place from 31 October to 12 November 2021 in Glasgow, UK.

The meeting will host 50 countries, including Australia, to negotiate key issues regarding climate change. The aim of the meeting is to increase climate ambition, build resilience, and lower emissions.

UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, is passionate about achieving strong targets from the meeting.

“Securing a brighter future for our children and future generations requires countries to take urgent action at home and abroad to turn the tide on climate change. It is with ambition, courage and collaboration as we approach the crucial COP26 summit in the UK that we can seize this moment together, so we can recover cleaner, rebuild greener and restore our planet.”

– Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister

Australia has previously been criticised for its lack of ambitious targets, in comparison to the rest of the world. Australian Prime Minister, Scott Morrison has not yet agreed to net-zero emissions by 2050.

“We’re getting left behind as a consequence of the paralysis within the Morison government, about climate policy.”

“It is no longer good enough to only commitment to net zero emissions by 2050, all nations need to roughly halve emissions by 2030,”

Scott Hamilton, Ticker Climate co-host and energy expert

“Australia should be looking at a target of 45% by 2030.” 

Carbon Tax

Carbon Tax or Carbon Pricing Carbon pricing captures the external costs of greenhouse gas emissions, the costs of emissions that the public pays for, and ties them to their sources through a price.

A price on carbon helps shift the burden for the damage from emissions back to those who are responsible for it and who can avoid it.

“I still think that carbon pricing mechanism is the most economically efficient, or the lowest cost way to achieve emissions reductions across the economy.”

Greg Combet, former Minister for Climate Change

Is Australia too dependent on fossil fuels?

Australia has electricity and energy systems that have been heavily dependent upon coal and other fossil fuels. Australia is an advanced economy, and can still invest in the transition that’s necessary for our energy system and in other important sectors of the economy.

“You not only need strong targets for 2030, but you also need strong climate action as well. That means stop funding fossil fuels and manage the transition out of coal-fired power electricity.” 

Scott Hamilton, Ticker Climate co-host and energy expert

Climate change and investment decisions

It is a common feature among major corporations to find commitments to net-zero emissions by 2050.

Combet chairs Industry Super Funds, which are big investors in infrastructure in Australia and globally. They have committed across their portfolio to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.

They’re about to enter into major power purchasing agreements to purchase renewable energy.

“It is critically important that the huge Industry Super Funds invest our money wisely so it won’t end up in stranded assets in a decarbonized future.”

“The good news is that Australia has immense opportunities for investment in global-scale projects, such as SunCable; the Asia Renewable Energy hub; and the recent Western Green Energy Hub in WA.” 

Scott Hamilton, Ticker Climate co-host and energy expert

Challenges for next generation

Combet is urging younger generations to keep fighting against climate change.

Other news this week:

Great Barrier Reef denied ‘in danger’ listing

After much anticipation, the World Heritage Committee decided against listing the Great Barrier Reef as “in danger”.

The decision ignored the recommendation of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

https://twitter.com/tickerNEWSco/status/1419564078888931331?s=20

The US still on fire

California continues to burn. The Dixie Fire, which started earlier this month and has now burned more than 190,000 acres. This has forced a new wave of evacuations in Northern California.

However, the blaze is still only 21 percent contained and continues to display extreme fire behavior.

Watch this week’s full episode here:

Ticker Climate

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ticker Views

First Xi, now Trump: tariff impacts on the Australian economy

Published

on

First, the tariffs from China hit Australian exporters now it’s the Trump tariffs on steel and aluminium – and as we have just learnt there will be no exemption.

How will these measures affect the USA, but also China, Australia and the rest of the global economy?

Like the China COVID tariffs, the Trump tariffs will hurt Australian workers. 

After all, 1 in 5 Australian workers depend on exporters and exporters pay 60 per cent higher wages on average than non-exporters in union jobs with EBAs. This will be bad for the steel workers of the Illawarra and the aluminium workers of Portland, and will also be inflationary, and put upward pressure on interest rates. That’s why we have seen the impact of tariff decisions (and tariff uncertainty) hitting the Australian share market and superannuation balances.

As a former Australian Prime Minister, could Ambassador Kevin Rudd got an exemption? I am sure he’s trying. But his pre-election comments disparaging Trump have not helped Australia’s interests not have the recent comments of another former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull. But to be fair, both Rudd and Turnbull have also been critical of Beijing. 

Of course, Australia is not alone. The USA’s North America closet trading partner, Canada is in the same boat, as is Mexico. Canada has just had a leadership election with former Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney (who was also Bank of England Governor) taking over as Prime Minister of Canada from Justin Trudeau. The Canadian Tories led by Pierre Poilievre are going to paint Carney as a Globalist, more comfortable in Switzerland than Saskatoon, but the tariffs on Canada give the new Prime Minister a chance to wrap himself in the Maple Leaf and fight the Trump tariffs. Carney can also paint Poilievre as Trump lite, and improve the Liberals chances in a contest suffering from the unpopularity of Trudeau. When a central banker can replaced a charismatic second-generation politician as Prime Minister and have a better chance we know we are living in interesting times. 

With China and the USA unreliable trade partners, what options does Australia have? The Albanese Labor Government, to their credit have improved relations with our North East Asian trading partners like Japan and South Korea, Taiwan, ASEAN (with the special Australia ASEAN summit in Melbourne last year) as well as Europe and the emerging markets of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and Latin America.

We could actually get closer to Canada under their new Prime Minister, given our similar economic and political backgrounds (if not geography) and current situation on steel and aluminium tariffs. Canada has also had its issues with Beijing as well as Washington.

So forget the tyranny of distance, and May the Moose be with you.

Professor Tim Harcourt is the Chief Economist of IPPG at University of Technology Sydney (UTS) and host of The Airport Economist on Ticker.

Tim is also former chief economist of the Australian Trade Commission (AUSTRADE), the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) and the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA).

Continue Reading

Ticker Views

Australia’s million-dollar suburb boom: The next hotspots for investors

Published

on

Since the start of the pandemic in 2020, many of Australia’s property markets have experienced some extraordinary price growth.

Many locations, both city-based and regional, achieved unprecedented price increases with median house and unit prices soaring as demand hit new highs. Where once a million-dollar house or unit median was unusual, that recent growth has launched many locations into that club for the first time.

As of January 2025, there were 1,194 suburbs or towns with a median house price or median unit price of $1 million or more – 50 more than in September 2024.

These figures show that although price growth may have eased in some locations in the past six months, the number of million-dollar markets continues to increase throughout Australia.

And there are still plenty of opportunities for investors to find markets that are set to tip over into million-dollar markets in 2025.

The latest Hotspotting and Propertybuyer, National Million Dollar Hotspots report shows there are plenty of markets teetering on the edge of a million-dollar median.

They are the markets where price growth has been steady in recent years and demand remains strong. ith that trajectory set to continue, these markets will soon breach the million-dollar barrier.

They are also strong markets for investors, where rents have been rising, yields are solid and vacancy rates are low.

Residential properties line the Sydney suburb of Birchgrove in Australia.

WATCH THE PROPERTY PLAYBOOK NOW

Million-dollar median

There is a distinct lure to investing in a suburb with a million-dollar median and it’s not just the prestige of the price tag. The magic of buying in a million-dollar suburb is its capital growth potential.

By reaching a million-dollar median, it’s already proven to be a desirable location where owner-occupiers and investors are prepared to pay top dollar to secure a piece of the action.

There are plenty of inner-city markets throughout Australia which already have million-dollar medians, but successful investors are those who find locations where prices aren’t just rising, but the fundamentals and amenities are in place to ensure ongoing solid price growth and increasing demand for properties in the suburb.

It’s essential when considering a million-dollar location to invest in that it meets a variety of criteria, not just price point. There needs to be ongoing demand for property and significant amenities to meet community needs, such as public transport, shops, schools and recreation spaces, whether that be beaches, parks or lakes.

WATCH THE PROPERTY PLAYBOOK NOW

Employment opportunities

Infrastructure spending is also important, as is solid population growth and access to good local employment opportunities. These are factors that will keep buyers returning time and again to these suburbs and increased buyer demand is what will keep prices increasing to $1 million and beyond.

Southport on the Gold Coast is a good example of this. Within less than six months, the median house price in Southport, which was a selection in our October 2024 report, has breached the $1 million median mark.

It had a median house price of around $970,000 in September 2024, which hit $1.04 million in February 2025 – that’s a rise of $70,000 in just five months.

The suburb has achieved 15% median house price growth in the 12 months to February 2025 – and is an example of what can be achieved in the Million Dollar Hotspots.

Terry Ryder is the Managing Director of HotSpotting

Continue Reading

Ticker Views

A fractured U.S.-Ukraine alliance signals trouble for the West

Published

on

In a scene that could have been scripted in the Kremlin, the Oval Office clash between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has laid bare a troubling fracture in U.S. foreign policy—one that Russian President Vladimir Putin is all too eager to exploit. 

What unfolded last week was not merely a diplomatic misstep but a stark illustration of how domestic bravado and miscalculation can undermine America’s standing on the world stage, tilting the balance of power toward Moscow at a pivotal moment.

The meeting, initially framed as a chance to solidify U.S.-Ukrainian ties through a potential minerals deal, devolved into a public reprimand of Zelensky, orchestrated with alarming precision by Vice President JD Vance and endorsed by Trump.

Vance’s remarks – dismissing Ukraine’s war effort and deriding diplomatic outreach as “propaganda” – set the stage for Trump to send Zelensky packing, empty-handed and humiliated. The fallout is a geopolitical gift to Putin, who now watches as the United States risks squandering its leverage in a conflict that tests the resilience of the Western alliance.

Bruised egos

This episode is more than a tale of bruised egos; it is a warning of the broader unraveling of U.S. – Russia relations at a time when strategic clarity is paramount. For decades, the United States has positioned itself as a bulwark against Russian expansionism, a role that has demanded both resolve and finesse.

Ukraine, locked in a brutal struggle for survival since Russia’s 2022 invasion, has been the frontline of that effort – a democratic nation fighting not just for itself but for the principle that borders cannot be redrawn by force.

Yet, in one ill-fated meeting, the Trump administration signaled a retreat from that commitment, handing Putin a propaganda coup and a tactical advantage.

The implications ripple far beyond Kyiv. Putin’s ambitions have never been confined to Ukraine; they extend to reasserting Russian dominance over its former sphere of influence and weakening NATO’s cohesion. A faltering U.S. commitment to Ukraine emboldens the Kremlin to press its advantage, not only on the battlefield but in the broader contest for global influence.

Staggering losses

With Russia’s incremental gains in eastern Ukraine and its willingness to endure staggering losses, Putin has wagered that time is on his side – a bet that Friday’s debacle only reinforces.

The administration’s defenders might argue that Trump seeks to disentangle the United States from a costly foreign conflict, a sentiment that resonates with a war-weary American public. But the reality of great power rivalry offers no such luxury.

Putin does not view negotiations as a path to compromise but as a tool to consolidate gains. The notion that he can be strong-armed into a settlement overlooks his track record of patience and ruthlessness.

By alienating Ukraine, Trump has not simplified the chessboard – he has ceded key pieces to his adversary.

Ahron Young is Ticker’s Founder and Managing Editor.

Continue Reading

Trending Now