Politics

Carney challenges Poilievre in critical Canadian election

Mark Carney calls snap election against Pierre Poilievre, focusing on Trump’s potential economic threats to Canada.

Published

10 months ago

March 24, 2025

Ahron Young

Mark Carney calls snap election against Pierre Poilievre, focusing on Trump’s potential economic threats to Canada.

In Short

Mark Carney has called a snap election for April 28, facing Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre amidst shifting public sentiment due to concerns over Trump’s economic policies.

Carney emphasises his financial expertise and plans to reform Canada’s trade strategies, while Poilievre seeks to capitalise on discontent with the current government.

Canada’s Mark Carney has called a snap election set for April 28, shortly after taking office. He faces Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, with public polls indicating a potential Liberal lead.

Initially, the Liberals appeared to be facing a significant election loss, but rising concerns over Donald Trump’s potential economic threats have shifted voter sentiment. Carney highlighted the crisis stemming from Trump’s trade policies, which he believes jeopardize Canadian sovereignty and economic stability.

The election is primarily centred on the impact of Trump and his tariffs, which have exacerbated existing economic issues in Canada. Carney, a seasoned banker with a background at Goldman Sachs, contrasts with Poilievre, a populist politician who criticises Carney’s ties to Trudeau’s administration. Poilievre aims to distance himself from Trudeau’s legacy and focus on the current government’s weaknesses.

Carney’s campaign is built on his experience navigating financial crises, and he has committed to reassessing Canada’s trade and defence strategies, moving away from reliance on the U.S. He plans to eliminate some Trudeau-era taxes to bolster economic growth.

Polling has dramatically shifted, suggesting the Liberals could secure a fourth consecutive term. Poilievre has attempted to leverage Trump’s comments about preferring a Liberal government to his advantage, asserting that he offers a stronger alternative for Canadians.

The election is poised to be a crucial contest in shaping Canada’s political future.

Politics

Nationals split from Coalition over Sussan Ley’s leadership

Nationals Leader David Littleproud announces split from Coalition, criticising Sussan Ley’s leadership and approach to Labor’s legislation

Published

3 hours ago

January 22, 2026

Ahron Young

Nationals Leader David Littleproud announces split from Coalition, criticising Sussan Ley’s leadership and approach to Labor’s legislation

In Short:
– Nationals Leader David Littleproud announced separation from the Coalition, citing Sussan Ley’s mismanagement of legislation.
– The entire Nationals frontbench resigned, refusing to serve under Ley’s leadership.

Nationals Leader David Littleproud announced his party’s decision to separate from the Coalition, citing mismanagement of Labor’s antisemitism legislation by Opposition Leader Sussan Ley.

He described the Coalition’s current position as “untenable” and stated that the party has chosen to “sit by ourselves.”Littleproud’s comments follow the resignation of the Nationals’ entire frontbench from the shadow cabinet. He indicated that Ley had ignored their resignations and expressed that they could not serve under her leadership.

Littleproud emphasised the breakdown in respect and decision-making within the Coalition, stating, “no one was prepared to serve in a Sussan Ley ministry.” He also noted opportunities for resolution were provided but ultimately disregarded by Ley.

The sentiment within the party was clear; they refuse to allow three of their senators to be scapegoated.

Future Coalition

Littleproud dismissed suggestions from former Prime Minister John Howard regarding party rules, asserting that making exceptions for the three dissenting senators would create issues.

He maintained that their action reflects the party’s values and commitment to integrity within their ranks.

Politics

Supreme Court tariffs and Albanese approval drop: What you need to know

Supreme Court’s tariff decision could reshape U.S. trade, while Albanese faces approval drop amid rising One Nation support.

Published

3 days ago

January 19, 2026

Harvey Vargas

Supreme Court’s tariff decision could reshape U.S. trade, while Albanese faces approval drop amid rising One Nation support.

The political and economic landscape is shifting on two fronts. In the United States, the Supreme Court is set to deliver a pivotal decision on tariffs that could reshape global trade, affect inflation, and influence U.S. economic growth. Chris Berg from RMIT University joins us to explain the stakes, from the political impact at home to the long-term implications for international relations and business strategy.

Meanwhile, in Australia, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese faces a steep drop in approval ratings as support for Pauline Hanson and her One Nation party surges. Recent events, including the Bondi massacre, have influenced voter sentiment, driving Labor’s primary vote down to 30 percent. Chris Berg breaks down what this means for Labor, the Coalition, and the upcoming elections, offering insight into broader public opinion trends and potential strategies moving forward.

Subscribe to never miss an episode of Ticker – https://www.youtube.com/@UCiMroZIXuwlSh1r5wZdeU6Q

#USTariffs #GlobalTrade #Inflation #Albanese #OneNation #AustralianPolitics #EconomicImpact #ChrisBerg

Politics

Global tensions unpacked: Venezuela, Iran, China & Australia’s Bondi Commission

Professor Tim Harcourt analyzes Venezuela’s geopolitical shifts post-U.S. military operation, affecting oil markets and global alliances.

Published

1 week ago

January 12, 2026

Harvey Vargas

Professor Tim Harcourt analyzes Venezuela’s geopolitical shifts post-U.S. military operation, affecting oil markets and global alliances.

Professor Tim Harcourt from UTS breaks down the rapidly shifting geopolitical landscape in 2026, focusing on the dramatic situation in Venezuela and its ripple effects across global power plays. We explore how the United States’ recent military operation and capture of Nicolás Maduro have reshaped Venezuelan politics, oil markets, and strategic alliances, especially with China, Russia, and Iran.

With Venezuela sitting on nearly 20% of the world’s proven oil reserves, the stakes are enormous, and Harcourt helps unpack the economic and political drivers behind U.S. intervention and China’s response.

We also delve into how the U.S. actions in Venezuela tie into broader geopolitical frictions — particularly Washington’s efforts to curb Chinese influence in Latin America, even as Beijing denounces the operation as a violation of sovereignty and frames its position in multilateral fora. The conversation peels back the layers of how energy, economics, and security intersect in one of the most consequential flashpoints this year.

Subscribe to never miss an episode of Ticker – https://www.youtube.com/@weareticker

#Geopolitics #Venezuela #USForeignPolicy #ChinaRelations #OilPolitics #InternationalRelations #TimHarcourt