But for one of the world’s biggest superpowers, the so-called ‘democracy versus authoritarianism’ narrative is one Beijing is attempting to stamp out.
This was President Xi’s first face-to-face meeting since his U.S. counterpart, Joe Biden took office nearly two years ago.
As Xi touched down in Bali, Indonesia for the G20 Summit, a range of bilateral talks had already been arranged.
China’s President lands in Bali ahead of crucial G20 talks.
His meeting with President Biden was high on the agenda, and signals a dialogue, which the U.S. was denied with Russian President Vladimir Putin, after he withdrew his personal invitation to the event.
Instead, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov is in attendance.
At China-U.S. meeting, which is understood to have lasted three-and-a-half hours, there was no secret about the ongoing rivalry between the two states.
“We need to find the right direction for the bilateral relationship going forward and elevate the relationship,” Biden said.
Meanwhile, China’s Foreign Ministry said “President Xi pointed out that the world is at a major inflection point in history.”
President Biden sought to rally G20 nations to condemn the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine.
Xi said he was “highly concerned” by the ongoing conflict, while Biden described the war as “brutal” and “irresponsible”.
A major point for international relations
Twenty of the world’s largest economies have gathered in Bali to exchange their shared challenges: inflation, supply chain pressures, and post-pandemic recovery.
It also provides the space for countries to hold face-to-face meetings on the sidelines of the event.
For example, Australia has shared a defence and security partnership with the U.S. for over 70 years.
In addition, Canberra’s era of economic engagement with Beijing was crucial during the height of the Global Financial Crisis.
Meanwhile, his Minister of Defence Richard Marles was speaking in Sydney as President Xi held closed-door talks with Biden.
“Australia values a productive relationship with China. And we expect China will play a more prominent role consistent with its economic and strategic weight,” Marles told delegates at the Sydney Institute Annual Dinner on Monday night.
“We seek that China’s increasing influence is exercised in a manner which reinforces the global rules-based order and promotes habits of cooperation that benefit the interests of all countries.”
RICHARD MARLES, AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE MINISTER
Richard Marles is Australia’s Defence Minister.
Marles described Australia’s approach to the Indo-Pacific region as “sober, responsible, and clear-eyed statecraft”.
The ANZUS Alliance—between Australia, New Zealand and the U.S.—has been the cornerstone of Canberra’s defence policy.
Today, the alliance provides technology, and intelligence advantages, which Australia would be challenged to develop on its own.
“That enhances Australia’s sovereignty. It does not diminish it,” Marles said.
However, China’s increased dominance in the region has raised eyebrows between likeminded allies like the U.S. and Australia.
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said competition can exist, and Washington should not seek to out=perform Beijing.
“China-U.S. relations should not be a zero-sum game where one side out-competes or thrives at the expense of the other,” the ministry said.
Why does this matter?
Biden and Xi made it clear they want to avoid any conflict, for now.
The White House readout from the meeting noted Biden raised “objections to the PRC’s coercive and increasingly aggressive actions toward Taiwan”.
The language was clear: the ongoing tensions “undermine peace and stability” and “jeopardise global prosperity”.
President Biden also raised concerns around human rights abuses and non-market economic practices in relation to U.S. workers.
But President Xi reminded his U.S. counterpart about the global clash between democracies and autocracies, and concerns about Beijing being misunderstood through this lens.
“Neither side should try to remould the other in one’s own image or seek to change or even subvert the other’s system.”
CHINA’S FOREIGN MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
“Instead of talking in one way and acting in another, the United States needs to honour its commitments with concrete action,” China’s Foreign Ministry said.
Washington’s foreign policy changed dramatically since President Richard Nixon’s initial engagement with Beijing.
Since then, China has developed the world’s largest navy, and has entered into the big league of world powers.
The question remains: will tensions reach boiling point?
Costa is a news producer at ticker NEWS. He has previously worked as a regional journalist at the Southern Highlands Express newspaper. He also has several years' experience in the fire and emergency services sector, where he has worked with researchers, policymakers and local communities. He has also worked at the Seven Network during their Olympic Games coverage and in the ABC Melbourne newsroom.
He also holds a Bachelor of Arts (Professional), with expertise in journalism, politics and international relations. His other interests include colonial legacies in the Pacific, counter-terrorism, aviation and travel.
President Donald Trump has moved to reshape US trade policy on two major fronts, signing executive orders that both ease tariffs on India and threaten new levies on countries that continue to trade with Iran.
The rollback of tariffs on India follows New Delhi’s commitment to halt imports of Russian oil, a move welcomed by Washington as it seeks to tighten pressure on Moscow’s energy revenues. The decision signals a thaw in trade tensions between the two nations and underscores the administration’s willingness to reward partners that align with US foreign policy priorities.
At the same time, Trump warned that nations maintaining commercial ties with Iran could face fresh US tariffs, escalating economic pressure on Tehran and its trade partners. The move reinforces a hardline strategy aimed at isolating Iran economically, while using trade measures as leverage in broader geopolitical negotiations.
Together, the twin decisions highlight the Trump administration’s increasingly assertive use of tariffs as a diplomatic tool, targeting both allies and adversaries. From the Indo-Pacific to the Middle East, the approach underscores how trade policy is being deployed not just to protect US industries, but to advance America’s strategic interests on the global stage.
The United States has announced an additional $6 million in humanitarian aid for Cuba, bringing total assistance since Hurricane Melissa struck the island in October to $9 million. The new relief package will focus on Cuba’s eastern provinces, including Holguín, Granma, Santiago de Cuba, and Guantánamo, providing staples like rice, beans, pasta, canned tuna, and solar lamps. U.S. officials said embassy staff will monitor distribution to prevent the government from diverting supplies.
The announcement comes amid worsening energy and fuel shortages. Cuba has faced widespread blackouts, leaving millions without electricity in several provinces, while rising food prices and limited fuel supplies have intensified humanitarian pressures. Officials warn that without sufficient oil imports, hospitals, transport, and essential services could be severely affected. The crisis has escalated following U.S. restrictions on Cuba’s oil shipments and Venezuela’s inability to supply fuel, forcing Cuba to turn to Mexico as its primary energy partner.
Humanitarian situation
Cuba’s President Miguel Díaz‑Canel accused the U.S. of imposing an “energy blockade,” while Mexican officials work to deliver fuel without triggering U.S. tariffs. Díaz‑Canel expressed willingness to engage in dialogue but insisted talks must respect Cuba’s sovereignty. U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres has voiced serious concern, warning that the humanitarian situation could deteriorate further if oil supplies remain restricted.
As Cuba struggles to balance disaster recovery with an ongoing energy crisis, the international community faces a delicate challenge: providing humanitarian support while navigating complex geopolitical tensions.
SpaceX expands Starlink with a mobile device and space tracking, raising concerns over revenue and US government reliance.
SpaceX is pushing Starlink beyond internet from space, with plans underway for new consumer facing services that could reshape the telecom landscape.
The company is reportedly exploring a Starlink mobile device, positioning it as a potential rival to established smartphone players as it looks to extend its reach from orbit to everyday tech.
Starlink has become SpaceX’s financial powerhouse, generating an estimated $8 billion in revenue last year, with fresh trademark and patent filings signalling even more ambitious expansion ahead.