Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

Money

$1 trillion nightmare behind Wall St exodus

Published

on

A significant financial exodus from Wall Street is causing New York City to hemorrhage staggering amounts of money, redirecting business opportunities to states in the southern United States, most notably Florida.

According to data compiled from 17,000 companies by Bloomberg, nearly 160 Wall Street firms have made the decision to relocate their headquarters away from New York City since the close of 2019. This shift has resulted in the transfer of almost $1 trillion in assets under management.

These firms, totaling 158 in number, moved out of New York City primarily due to concerns related to rising crime rates, high taxes, and an increasingly unaffordable cost of living. The cumulative AUM of these firms amounts to an astounding $993 billion.

Prominent among these firms is Icahn Capital Management, led by billionaire corporate raider Carl Icahn. In August 2020, the firm abandoned its luxurious Manhattan location at the General Motors Building on Fifth Avenue, opting instead for a 14-story office complex situated in a Miami suburb.

Currently managing $22.2 billion in assets, Icahn Capital Management is now located just a short distance from Carl Icahn’s residence in Indian Creek Village, Florida.

Moving south

Another noteworthy example is Elliott Management, a hedge fund led by Paul Singer, which controls a total of $59.2 billion in assets. In October 2020, the firm shifted its headquarters from Midtown Manhattan to West Palm Beach, Florida.

Cathie Wood, renowned for her bold investment in Tesla, moved her firm ARK Investment Management, which manages assets worth $24.7 billion, to St. Petersburg, Florida, in 2021.

Of the 158 companies from New York that have relocated, 56 have chosen Florida as their new base of operations. Many of the remaining firms have similarly chosen to move to warmer states such as Texas and the Carolinas.

The financial exodus from New York is not an isolated occurrence; California has also lost $1 trillion in financial assets under management to states like Florida, Texas, and other regions with a lower cost of living.

NYC economy

The departure of financial firms poses a serious threat to the city’s economy. Wall Street alone accounted for 16% of the city’s economic activity in the previous year and 7.3% of economic activity across the state, marking the highest percentage in the nation by a significant margin, as the national average is just 1.7%.

Additionally, the mass migration of financial firms has substantial tax implications for both New York City and the state. In the preceding year, financial firms contributed $5.4 billion in taxes to New York City and represented nearly a quarter of all personal income tax collections.

Tax revenue from the financial industry is anticipated to experience a significant decline, with repercussions expected for the state, which heavily relies on personal income taxes. As of 2022, New York’s share of financial industry jobs was 17.6%, a drastic reduction from the one-third share it held in 1990. The report highlights that “jobs have shifted to lower-cost regions.”

Prominent firms, including Goldman Sachs, have embraced lower-cost regions for expansion. Goldman Sachs, for instance, is investing significantly in Dallas, where the cost of living is approximately 40% cheaper than in New York.

Leaving town

Goldman Sachs is in the process of constructing a three-building campus near downtown Dallas. This $500 million, 815,000-square-foot development, scheduled to open in 2027, was made possible by $18 million in tax breaks granted by the city.

Other notable firms, including Icahn Enterprises and AllianceBernstein, have also relocated their headquarters away from New York to more cost-efficient locations.

Continue Reading

Money

Fed cuts rates, signals more potentially ahead

Fed lowers rates amid job market concerns, signalling potential further cuts in upcoming meetings

Published

on

Fed lowers rates amid job market concerns, signalling potential further cuts in upcoming meetings

video
play-sharp-fill
In Short:
– The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by a quarter-point to address job market concerns.
– Officials expect at least two additional rate cuts by year-end amid ongoing economic uncertainties.
The Federal Reserve has reduced interest rates by a quarter-point, addressing concerns about a weakening job market overshadowing inflation worries.
A majority of officials anticipate at least two additional cuts by year-end during the remaining meetings in October and December.Banner

Fed Chair Jerome Powell noted a significant shift in the labour market, highlighting “downside risk” in his statements.

The recent rate cut, supported by 11 of 12 Fed voters, aims to recalibrate an economy facing uncertainties from policy changes and market pressures.

Policy Dynamics

The decision comes amid intense political scrutiny, with President Trump openly criticising Powell’s reluctance to lower rates.

Despite the controversy, Powell asserts that political pressures do not influence Fed operations.

The current benchmark federal-funds rate now sits between 4% and 4.25%, the lowest since 2021, providing some reprieve to consumers and small businesses. Economic forecasts indicate ongoing complexities, including inflation trends and the impact of tariffs on labour dynamics, complicating future policy decisions.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Money

Fed faces unusual dissent amid leadership uncertainty

Fed’s Powell navigates contentious meeting amid Trump-appointed dissenters as rate cut looms and succession contest heats up

Published

on

Fed’s Powell navigates contentious meeting amid Trump-appointed dissenters as rate cut looms and succession contest heats up

video
play-sharp-fill
In Short:
– This week’s Federal Reserve meeting faces unusual dissent as Chair Powell approaches his term’s end.
– Analysts predict dissent over expected rate cuts due to political pressures from Trump-appointed officials.
This week’s Federal Reserve meeting is set to be particularly unusual, with Chair Jerome Powell facing significant disagreements over future policy as he approaches the end of his term in May.Tensions began before the meeting when Fed governor Lisa Cook won a court ruling allowing her to attend, despite opposition from President Trump, who is attempting to remove her.

The situation is further complicated by the recent swearing-in of Trump adviser Stephen Miran to the Fed’s board, following a Senate confirmation.

Analysts believe Powell may encounter dissent on an expected quarter-percentage-point rate cut from both Trump-appointed officials and regional Fed presidents concerned about inflation.

Banner

Potential Dissent

Trump has urged significant rate cuts and for the board to challenge Powell’s decisions.

Some analysts predict dissenting votes from Miran and other Trump appointees in favour of larger cuts. Federal Reserve veterans express concerns that political motivations may undermine the institution’s integrity, with indications that greater dissent could become commonplace.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Money

RBA plans to ban credit card surcharges in Australia

Reserve Bank of Australia plans to ban credit card surcharges despite banks warning of potential higher fees and weaker rewards

Published

on

Reserve Bank of Australia plans to ban credit card surcharges despite banks warning of potential higher fees and weaker rewards.

In Short:
– The RBA plans to ban surcharges on debit and credit card transactions, supported by consumer group Choice.
– Major banks oppose the ban, warning it could lead to higher card fees and reduced rewards for credit card users.

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) intends to implement a ban on surcharges associated with debit and credit card transactions. Consumer advocacy group Choice endorses this initiative, arguing that it is unjust for users of low-cost debit cards to incur similar fees as credit card holders.Banner

The major banks, however, are opposing this reform. They caution that the removal of surcharges could prompt customers to abandon credit cards due to diminished rewards.

A final decision by the RBA is anticipated by December 2025.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Trending Now