Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

News

With so much to lose, were Musk & Zuck ever going to fight?

Published

on

The much-discussed potential showdown between tech moguls Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk appears to be losing steam.

In a recent development, Zuckerberg stated that it’s time to abandon efforts to arrange the proposed cage match, asserting that Musk “isn’t serious” about the idea.

Zuckerberg took to social media platform Threads, asserting, “I think we can all agree Elon isn’t serious and it’s time to move on.” He recounted the progression of events, noting his genuine offer, UFC President Dana White’s involvement for a charity match, and Musk’s evolving stance, including the suggestion of a practice round in Zuckerberg’s backyard.

The Facebook founder expressed his readiness to engage in legitimate competition, highlighting the importance of facing opponents who take the sport seriously.

X vs Meta

Although Musk has not responded to Zuckerberg’s recent comments, his own previous statements seemed to point toward a more substantial event. Over the weekend, on his platform X (formerly known as Twitter), Musk shared additional details about the proposed fight.

He indicated that the event would be organized by their respective foundations, with the livestream accessible through the X platform and Meta. Musk also mentioned that the fight’s setting would evoke ancient Rome, an arrangement discussed with Italy’s Culture Minister Gennaro Sangiuliano.

Despite this, the fight’s viability remains uncertain. Musk previously cited medical reasons for potential delays, hinting at the possibility of surgery. This backdrop casts doubt on the true seriousness of the event.

The notion of a face-off initially emerged when Musk responded to a tweet about Zuckerberg’s Thread release.

Musk jokingly suggested a cage match, prompting Zuckerberg to seemingly accept the challenge. The banter led to discussions about venues and arrangements, creating a buzz online.

Continue Reading

News

Trump named Time’s 2024 Person of the Year

Trump named Time’s 2024 Person of the Year, following election win, assassination attempt survival, and felony conviction.

Published

on

Donald Trump has been named Time magazine’s Person of the Year for 2024.

This designation follows Trump’s win in the US presidential election and his survival of an assassination attempt, as well as his conviction on 34 counts of falsifying business records.

He is set to be sworn in as the 47th president of the United States on January 20, 2025.

Time’s editor-in-chief, Sam Jacobs, noted that selecting Trump was straightforward, given his significant impact over the past year.

 

Trump expressed gratitude for the honor during a Wall Street event, marking his second selection as Person of the Year, the first being in 2016.

Throughout 2024, Trump experienced notable events, such as the attempted assassination at a Pennsylvania rally, which garnered global media attention.

Additionally, his conviction in May made him the first American president to be labeled a convicted felon, although he has yet to be sentenced.

Upcoming term

After a successful campaign, Trump celebrated his presidential election victory in November, promising to enhance the country during his upcoming term.

With this latest recognition, Trump, who has been featured on Time covers numerous times since his first in 1989, reaffirms his relationship with the publication despite past controversies, including displaying fake covers at his golf clubs.

Trump remains a prominent figure in American politics with his upcoming return to the Oval Office.

Continue Reading

News

Coalition’s nuclear plan cheaper than Labor’s renewable rollout

Coalition’s nuclear plan to save $263 billion compared to Labor’s renewables, promising cheaper electricity and lower emissions by 2050.

Published

on

The Coalition claims its nuclear power plan will save $263 billion compared to Labor’s renewable energy strategy by 2050, resulting in lower electricity costs.

Economic modelling conducted by Frontier Economics estimates the Coalition’s plan, which aims for net zero emissions by 2050, will cost $331 billion.

In contrast, Labor’s renewable energy plan is projected to cost $594 billion according to the modelling.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton plans to share these findings, stating that the analysis supports their position that Australians will benefit from the Coalition’s approach.

Dutton claims that fewer hidden costs and reduced infrastructure expenses will lead to lower energy prices.

He noted that many advanced economies are increasing their nuclear capabilities and urged Australia to do the same.

Seven plants

The Coalition’s model includes seven nuclear power plants, with renewable energy still providing 54% of the National Electricity Market by 2050 and nuclear contributing 38%.

Labor’s strategy anticipates that 94% of power generation will come from renewable energy by the same year, with 90% of coal-fired power exiting the system by 2034.

However, coal may need to operate longer in the Coalition’s scenario until nuclear power is online.

The Coalition’s plan also suggests a reduced reliance on gas due to a lower number of renewables needing stabilisation.

Dutton committed to constructing and operating seven nuclear plants, with the first expected to be operational as early as 2036.

Continue Reading

News

Tech giants face new Australian news payment policy

ByteDance joins Meta, Google in Australia’s new news payment policy; potential charges for social media platforms begin January 1.

Published

on

TikTok’s parent company ByteDance will join Meta and Alphabet in paying new levies for Australian news unless they reach agreements with publishers.

Apple and Microsoft may also be affected if their revenues in Australia exceed $250 million annually.

Labor’s policy seeks to compel Meta to negotiate after it previously refused to pay for news.

Under the proposed legislation, the Australian Taxation Office will impose an annual levy on social media and search companies, exceeding the current news media bargaining code’s value of about $200 million annually.

Companies that negotiate payments to news publishers can offset these payments against their levy.

For example, if a platform faces an $11 million levy with a 10% uplift, it must secure at least $10 million in deals to avoid paying the ATO.

News Distribution

Any shortfall between deals and the annual charge will be collected by the ATO and distributed to publishers.

Final policy details will emerge after consultations early next year.

The law takes effect on January 1, emphasizing quick negotiations with tech companies.

Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones clarified that the policy aims to facilitate negotiations, not increase government revenue, stating that digital platforms benefit financially from Australia and should support quality journalism.

Labor’s decision follows Meta’s refusal to renegotiate under the existing bargaining code, which could lead to significant job losses in journalism.

The Labor-controlled committee has deemed the current code “broken” and called for an alternative.

Continue Reading

Trending Now