Money

“We’re used to it” – Business continues in Israel

Published

1 month ago

November 1, 2023

ticker NEWS

The ongoing Israel-Hamas war sends shockwaves through global markets but many Israeli businesses are just getting on with it.

The Israel-Hamas conflict, now in its [keyword: fifth] week, is reverberating across international financial landscapes, leaving major corporations grappling with uncertainties. As violence escalates in the Middle East, the economic repercussions are felt far beyond the region’s borders.

Large companies operating in various sectors have found themselves navigating an increasingly complex environment. Oil prices have surged, affecting energy giants like Shell and BP. Supply chain disruptions have hit tech giants such as Apple and Samsung, causing production delays and driving up prices for consumer electronics.

Multinational banks, including HSBC and JPMorgan Chase, face challenges in managing investments amid market volatility. Tourism and hospitality giants, like Hilton and Airbnb, are experiencing cancellations and decreased bookings, impacting their bottom lines.

In response, investors are shifting portfolios, seeking safer assets, and diversifying into sectors less exposed to geopolitical risk. Global stock markets are experiencing turbulence, leaving shareholders anxious about the future.

The Israel-Hamas war’s financial implications remain uncertain, making it a pivotal issue for global business leaders and investors alike.

But other businesses are carrying on regardless.

Weebit Nano is a leading developer of advanced memory technologies for the global semiconductor industry.

CEO Coby Hanoch spoke to Ticker from Israel and said unfortunately this kind of terror has become common place, and businesses have found a way to carry on. #featured

Money

RBA maintains 4.35% rates as mortgage applications surge

Published

15 hours ago

December 5, 2023

ticker NEWS

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has decided to keep its official cash rate at 4.35%, citing concerns over the rapidly increasing number of mortgage applications.

This decision comes after several consecutive meetings where the RBA has refrained from adjusting interest rates.

The central bank’s decision to hold rates steady reflects their cautious approach to managing the current housing market boom. Mortgage applications have seen a significant surge in recent months, driven by record-low interest rates and increased demand for housing. While this has been a boon for the real estate industry, it has raised concerns about the potential for a housing bubble and financial stability.

Experts are divided on whether the RBA’s decision is the right course of action.

Some argue that maintaining low-interest rates is necessary to support economic recovery, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Others worry that the continued surge in mortgage applications without rate adjustments could lead to unsustainable levels of household debt.

In light of this decision, homeowners, prospective buyers, and investors will be closely watching the housing market’s trajectory and wondering how long the RBA can maintain its current stance.

Money

There’s a 50/50 chance of a 2024 recession

Published

20 hours ago

December 5, 2023

ticker NEWS

The economy has been remarkably resilient despite massive pressures – but is that about to change in 2024?

The US economy is in for a sharp slowdown in 2024 as a closely watched survey of top economists foresees stubbornly high inflation, a rise in unemployment and a 50% chance of recession.

#ticker today #money

Money

Tesla insurance sued for ‘inflated’ premiums, judge rules

Published

24 hours ago

December 5, 2023

ticker NEWS

A judge has ruled that Tesla’s insurance unit must face a lawsuit alleging “inflated” premiums.

The decision comes after policyholders claimed the electric car company’s insurance division overcharged them for coverage.

The lawsuit, which was filed by a group of Tesla policyholders, alleges that the premiums charged by Tesla’s insurance unit were significantly higher than market rates for similar coverage.

The plaintiffs argue that Tesla’s insurance division engaged in unfair pricing practices, leading to overpayment by policyholders.

Tesla has not yet commented on the judge’s decision, but the lawsuit raises questions about the transparency and fairness of the company’s insurance pricing.

It also highlights the growing scrutiny on how tech companies enter and compete in traditional industries like insurance.