Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

Tech

Tesla abandons low-cost car amidst fierce Chinese EV competiton

Published

1 year ago

on

Tesla has made a significant shift in its strategy, abandoning plans for the long-anticipated affordable electric car, according to sources familiar with the matter and company messages.


  • Tesla cancels plans for a low-cost electric car, shifting focus towards developing self-driving robotaxis, in a departure from Elon Musk’s earlier vision of mass-market affordability.



  • The decision comes amidst fierce competition from Chinese electric vehicle makers offering significantly cheaper options, posing challenges to Tesla’s growth targets and market dominance.



  • Despite the cancellation, Tesla’s future plans for robotaxis remain uncertain, while the company faces scrutiny over various issues including regulatory hurdles and product quality concerns.


This decision marks a departure from Elon Musk’s earlier vision of providing affordable electric vehicles to the masses, opting instead to focus on developing self-driving robotaxis on the same platform.

Since Tesla’s inception, Musk has repeatedly promised an affordable electric car, often considered a cornerstone of the company’s mission. However, the cancellation of this project underscores the growing challenges Tesla faces in the increasingly competitive electric vehicle market, particularly against Chinese automakers offering significantly lower-priced options.

The decision to scrap the affordable car project was reportedly communicated to employees in a meeting held in late February.

Instead, Tesla will prioritise the development of self-driving robotaxis, albeit in lower volumes than initially projected for the affordable model.

Following the Reuters report, Tesla’s stock experienced a significant drop, only to rebound slightly after Musk’s social media post announcing an upcoming unveiling event for the Tesla Robotaxi.

READ MORE – The battery set to change Electric Vehicles and Tesla’s market share

This shift in focus comes amidst intense competition from Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers offering cars priced as low as $10,000.

Musk’s vision

While Tesla’s decision to pivot away from the affordable car strategy may disappoint investors and consumers, it reflects Musk’s vision of prioritising the development of autonomous driving technology, which he believes represents the future of mobility.

The cancellation of the affordable car project poses challenges for Tesla’s ambitious growth targets, including Musk’s goal of selling 20 million vehicles by 2030.

The delay in pursuing a low-cost option has allowed Chinese automakers to gain market share and offer competitive pricing, putting pressure on Tesla’s market dominance.

Tesla’s future plans for robotaxis remain unclear, as the company continues to face regulatory hurdles and technical challenges in achieving fully autonomous driving capabilities.

Nonetheless, Musk remains optimistic about the potential of self-driving cars to revolutionise transportation.

Related Topics:

Ahron Young is an award winning journalist who has covered major news events around the world. Ahron is the Managing Editor and Founder of TICKER NEWS.

Continue Reading

Tech

OpenAI completes $6.6 billion share sale at $500 billion

OpenAI completes $6.6 billion share sale at $500 billion valuation, cementing status as top private company globally

Published

15 hours ago

on

October 2, 2025

By

OpenAI completes $6.6 billion share sale at $500 billion valuation, cementing status as top private company globally

video
play-sharp-fill
In Short:
– OpenAI’s $6.6 billion share sale allows employees to sell stock at a $500 billion valuation, up from $300 billion.
– The sale supports employee retention amid intense competition for AI talent without pursuing an IPO.
OpenAI has concluded a secondary share sale amounting to $6.6 billion, enabling current and former employees to sell stock at a valuation of $500 billion, as reported by Bloomberg.This valuation represents a significant increase from $300 billion earlier this year, indicating strong investor interest.

Banner

Reports indicate that OpenAI had initially authorised up to $10.3 billion for the share sale, although only about two-thirds of this was executed.

The offer was made to eligible employees who had held their shares for over two years, with participation starting in early September.

The recent share sale is OpenAI’s second significant tender offer in less than a year, following a $1.5 billion deal with SoftBank in November.

This transaction solidifies OpenAI’s position as the most valuable privately held company globally, surpassing SpaceX’s valuation of $456 billion.

Talent Competition

Intensified competition for AI talent has emerged, with companies like Meta reportedly offering substantial compensation packages to attract top researchers.

OpenAI is part of a trend among startups, including SpaceX, Stripe, and Databricks, utilising secondary sales to allow employee cash-outs while remaining private.

This strategy aims to retain talent and reward long-serving employees without pursuing an IPO.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Tech

What Saudi Arabia’s role in the Electronic Arts buyout tells us about ‘game-washing’

Published

1 day ago

on

October 2, 2025

By

What Saudi Arabia’s role in the Electronic Arts buyout tells us about image, power and ‘game-washing’

Jacqueline Burgess, University of the Sunshine Coast

Video game publisher Electronic Arts (EA), one of the biggest video game companies in the world behind games such as The Sims and Battlefield, has been sold to a consortium of buyers for US$55 billion (about A$83 billion). It is potentially the largest-ever buyout funded by private equity firms. Not AI, nor mining or banking, but video games.

The members of the consortium include: Silver Lake Partners, an American private global equity firm focusing on technology; the Public Investment Fund (PIF), Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund; and the investment firm Affinity Partners, run by Jared Kushner, son-in-law of American President Donald Trump.

The consortium will purchase all of the publicly traded company’s shares, making it private. But while the consortium and EA’s shareholders will likely be celebrating – each share was valued at US$210, representing a 25% premium – it’s not all good news.

PIF acquiring EA raises concerns about possible “game-washing”, and less than ideal future business practices.

EA’s poor reputation

Video games are big business. The global video game industry is worth more than the film and music industries combined. But why would these buyers specifically want to buy EA, an entity that has won The Worst Company in America award twice?

It has been criticised for alleged poor labour practices, a focus on online gaming (even when it’s not ideal, such as in single-player stories), and a history of acquiring popular game studios and franchises and running them into the ground.

Players of some of EA’s most beloved franchises, such as The Sims, Dragon Age and Star Wars Battlefront II, believe the games have been negatively impacted due to the company meddling in production, and wanting to focus on online play and micro-transactions.

Microtransactions are small amounts of money paid to access, or potentially access, in-game items or currency. Over time, they can add up to a lot of money, and have even been linked to the creation of problem gambling behaviours. Unsurprisingly, they are not popular among players.

Current global economic stresses have affected video games and other high-tech industries. The development costs of a video game can be hundreds of millions of dollars. EA has reacted to its slowing growth by cancelling games and laying-off close to 2,000 workers since 2023. So a US$55 billion offer probably looked enticing.

Saudi Arabia’s investment spree

In recent years, the Saudi wealth fund has been on an entertainment investment splurge. Before this latest acquisition, PIF invested heavily in both golf and tennis.

It is a sponsor and official naming rights partner of both the Women’s Tennis Association rankings and the Association of Tennis Professionals rankings.

The wealth fund also helped establish the LIV Golf tour in 2022, in opposition to the Professional Golf Association (PGA). By offering huge sums of money, it was able to attract players away from the PGA. One player was reportedly offered US$125 million (A$189 million). This tactic worked; a merger was announced between LIV, the DPA (European golf tour) and the PGA (North American golf tour) in 2023, with PIF as the main funder.

PIF, via its subsidiaries, has also been acquiring stakes in other video game companies. For example, it is one of the largest shareholders in Nintendo, the developer behind Mario, and purchased Niantic (the company behind Pokémon Go) earlier this year for US$3.5 billion (A$5.3 billion)

Why does PIF want video game companies?

Live sport and video games have a few things in common: they are fun, engaging and entertaining. And being known for entertainment is good PR for a country that has been accused of human rights abuses.

PIF’s investment in sport has been called “sportswashing”: using an association with sport to counteract bad publicity and a tarnished moral reputation. Video games, with their interactivity and entertainment value, represent an opportunity for game-washing.

The fact EA owns many sports games’ franchises would also be a bonus, potentially allowing for further video game and sport collaboration. And the fact the video game industry is projected to keep growing globally makes it a good investment for an oil-rich nation looking to economically diversify.

Beyond game-washing concerns, we also need to pay attention to the type of buyout happening here. This is a “leveraged” buyout, meaning part of the purchase price – in this case US$20 billion (A$30 billion) – is funded as debt taken on by the company. So once the acquisition is complete, EA will have US$20 billion of new debt.

With all that new debt to service, it would only be natural to have concerns about more lay-offs, cost-cutting and increasing monetisation via strategies such as microtransactions. Ultimately, this would result in a poorer experience for players. It seems the more things change, the more they stay the same.The Conversation

Jacqueline Burgess, Lecturer in International Business, University of the Sunshine Coast

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Tech

80% of ransomware victims pay ransom, says report

Hiscox report reveals 80% of ransomware victims pay ransom, but only 60% recover data successfully

Published

2 days ago

on

October 1, 2025

By

Hiscox report reveals 80% of ransomware victims pay ransom, but only 60% recover data successfully

video
play-sharp-fill
In Short:
– Cyber attacks increasingly target businesses, with 80% of ransomware victims opting to pay ransoms.
– SMEs are often affected, with only 60% recovering data after paying ransoms amidst rising cyber insurance costs.
Cyber attacks are increasingly targeting sensitive business data, with many companies paying ransoms. A report from Hiscox indicates that 80% of businesses affected by ransomware over the past year opted to pay.The annual Cyber Readiness Report highlights a concerning trend in ransomware attacks against well-known companies, including Marks and Spencer, the Co-op, and Jaguar Land Rover.

The latter recently received a £1.5bn government loan guarantee aimed at protecting its supply chain, which includes numerous small firms.

Banner

Many victims of cyber attacks are small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which often require assistance to recover. Hiscox reported that while 27% of the surveyed 5,750 SMEs faced ransomware attacks, only 60% that paid the ransom managed to recover their data.

Impact on Firms

The broader findings revealed that nearly 60% experienced some form of cyber attack, with numerous businesses attributing their vulnerabilities to artificial intelligence.

Companies face not only financial repercussions, including fines and lost revenue, but also damage to their reputations. Eddie Lamb of Hiscox warned against underestimating the severe consequences of cyber attacks on all business sizes.

Jaguar Land Rover was reportedly finalising cyber insurance when it was attacked, incurring significant losses. Industry experts note that the rising costs of comprehensive cyber insurance policies may leave many firms unprotected. The cyber insurance market is growing, responding to the high-profile impacts experienced by businesses like M&S, which anticipates recovering losses through insurance after its own ransomware incident.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Trending Now