Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

News

Will taxpayers foot the bill for the Port of Darwin?

Published

on

As tensions between China and Australia continue to escalate, Australian taxpayers could be the latest victims of the deteriorating bilateral relationship between the two nations.

The Australian government is launching a review into the Port of Darwin, in the country’s north, which is currently owned by Chinese company, Landbridge.

If the review finds that ownership of the Port needs to be given up, taxpayers could be forced to foot the multimillion-dollar compensation bill that follows.

The Chinese company, owned by billionaire Ye Cheng, may have to give up the port if it’s found to be in breach of the so-called critical infrastructure laws which were enacted in 2018.

But experts fear the costs associated with this takeover could soar beyond $500 million dollars, if the 99-year lease is torn up.

“Landbridge acquired the lease to Darwin Port in good faith following a transparent process in 2015,” says Landbridge vice-president Mike Hughes.

“Our involvement was reviewed by both the Foreign Investment Review Board and the Department of Defence at the time and it has been subject to a Senate inquiry.”

Australia’s leader Scott Morrison says:

“If there is advice from the Defence Department or our security agencies that change their view about the national security implications of any piece of critical infrastructure, we have legislation now which is dealing with critical infrastructure.”

For a long time, Darwin has been seen as a “strategic frontline for Australia”, and the handing over of such a vital infrastructure lease to a Chinese-backed company in 2015 has baffled many politicians.

As tensions between China and Australia continue to grow, it will be interesting to see how the federal government responds.

Accordingly, if the lease is broken, one would expect a fairly animated response from Beijing in response.

William is an Executive News Producer at TICKER NEWS, responsible for the production and direction of news bulletins. William is also the presenter of the hourly Weather + Climate segment. With qualifications in Journalism and Law (LLB), William previously worked at the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) before moving to TICKER NEWS. He was also an intern at the Seven Network's 'Sunrise'. A creative-minded individual, William has a passion for broadcast journalism and reporting on global politics and international affairs.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Rate cuts ahead? US stocks bounce as inflation cools

Published

on

Investor sentiment is improving as fresh data out of the US and Australia shifts expectations for central bank action.

Stronger-than-expected labour market figures in Australia have raised questions about whether the Reserve Bank will move ahead with a rate cut next week. While the RBA has signalled it is watching data closely, the resilience in employment may force a delay.

Meanwhile, in the US, softer inflation data has lifted hopes that the Federal Reserve could cut rates later this year. That news helped spark a sharp turnaround in US equities, with the so-called “sell America” trade now unwinding as buyers return to Wall Street.

Continue Reading

News

Trump’s $600B Middle East Deal: What It Means for Global Stability

Published

on

 

President Donald Trump’s four-day Middle East tour during his second term has sparked global attention, locking in a monumental $600 billion investment from Saudi Arabia. From AI to defence, space to energy—this economic pact is reshaping U.S. foreign policy.

In an unprecedented move, Trump also lifted long-standing U.S. sanctions on Syria after meeting its new president, raising eyebrows among traditional allies.

Ticker News anchor Veronica Dudo speaks with Erbil “Bill” Gunasti, former Turkish PM Press Officer and Republican strategist, to break down the implications for national security, global diplomacy, and the path to peace in Ukraine.

Continue Reading

News

Trump’s AI deals raise concerns over China ties

Trump’s AI deals in the Middle East spark division over national security risks and concerns over China ties.

Published

on

Trump’s AI deals in the Middle East spark division over national security risks and concerns over China ties.

In Short:
Trump’s AI deals with Saudi Arabia and the UAE are causing internal conflicts in his administration over US national security. Officials are concerned that American technology supplied to the Gulf could ultimately benefit China, leading to calls for enhanced legal protections.

President Donald Trump’s recent AI deals in Saudi Arabia and the UAE are causing internal conflicts within his administration.

Concerns are rising among officials, particularly China hawks, about the implications for US national security and economic interests.

Agreements include shipments of vast quantities of semiconductors from Nvidia and AMD to the Gulf states, prompting fears that American technology could ultimately benefit China, given the region’s ties with Beijing.

While the accords include clauses to limit Chinese access to the chips, some officials argue that further legal protections are necessary.

Critics, including Vice President JD Vance, have suggested that maintaining US dominance in AI is crucial, and shipping chips abroad might undermine that goal.

Supporters of the deals, including AI Adviser David Sacks, argue the need for American technology in the Gulf to deter reliance on Chinese alternatives.

Despite this, internal discussions are underway to potentially slow down or reassess the agreements due to ongoing national security concerns.

Conversations have also included proposals for a significant chip manufacturing facility in the UAE, which many officials deem risky due to China’s influence.

Additionally, worries persist about G42, an AI firm in Abu Dhabi, which has historical ties to Huawei.

The agreements with Gulf countries promise to enhance their technological capabilities while necessitating careful oversight to address US security priorities.

 

Continue Reading

Trending Now