Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

Politics

Newspoll steady as both leaders’ ratings fall

Published

on

Newspoll steady as both leaders’ ratings fall; Labor surging in poll of marginal seats

Adrian Beaumont, The University of Melbourne

With less than two weeks to go now until the federal election, the polls continue to favour the government being returned.

Newspoll was steady at 52–48 to Labor, but primary vote changes indicated a gain for Labor as both leaders dropped on net approval. A Redbridge marginal seats poll had Labor gaining two points since the previous week for a 54.5–45.5 lead, a 3.5-point swing to Labor in those seats since the 2022 election.

A national Newspoll, conducted April 14–17 from a sample of 1,263, gave Labor a 52–48 lead, unchanged on the April 7–10 Newspoll. Primary votes were 35% Coalition (steady), 34% Labor (up one), 12% Greens (steady), 7% One Nation (down one) and 12% for all Others (steady).

In the last two Newspolls, Labor has been a little lucky to get a 52–48 lead as this would have been given by 2022 election preference flows, and Newspoll is making a pro-Coalition adjustment to One Nation preferences. This time the 2022 election flow method would give Labor about a 53–47 lead.

This Newspoll is the only new national poll since Friday’s update. The fieldwork dates were nearly the same as for the Freshwater poll that had Labor ahead by just 50.3–49.7 (April 14–16 for Freshwater). Other polls indicate that Freshwater is likely the outlier. Here’s the Labor two-party vote chart.

In-person early voting begins on Tuesday ahead of the May 3 election, so there isn’t much time for the Coalition to turn around their deficit, if the polls are accurate.

Anthony Albanese’s net approval in Newspoll was down five points to -9, with 52% dissatified and 43% satisfied. Peter Dutton’s net approval was down three points to -22, a record low for him. Albanese led Dutton as better PM by 52–36 (49–38 previously). This is Albanese’s biggest lead since May 2024.

Here’s the graph of Albanese’s net approval in Newspoll this term. The plus signs are data points and a smoothed line has been fitted.

Albanese and Labor were preferred to Dutton and the Coalition on helping with the cost of living by 31–28. Labor also led on dealing with uncertainty caused by Donald Trump (39–32), lowering taxes (33–26) and helping Australians buy their first home (29–24). The Coalition led on growing our economy by 34–29.

For so long, it had appeared that the cost of living issue would sink Labor at this election, so this result will please Labor.

Labor surges further ahead in Redbridge marginal seats poll

A poll of 20 marginal seats by Redbridge and Accent Research for the News Corp tabloids was conducted April 9–15 from a sample of 1,000. It gave Labor a 54.5–45.5 lead, a two-point gain for Labor since the April 4–9 marginal seats poll. Primary votes were 35% Labor (steady), 34% Coalition (down two), 14% Greens (up two) and 17% for all Others (steady).

The overall 2022 vote in these 20 seats was 51–49 to Labor, so this poll implies a 3.5-point swing to Labor from the 2022 election. If applied to the national 2022 result of 52.1–47.9 to Labor, Labor would lead by about 55.5–44.5. Since the first wave of this marginal seats tracker in early February, Labor has gained 6.5 points.

Albanese’s net favourability improved three points since last week to -5, while Dutton’s slumped six points to -22. By 36–26, voters thought Albanese and Labor had better election promises for them than Dutton and the Coalition.

By 56–13, voters agreed with Labor’s attack line that Dutton’s nuclear plan will cost $600 billion, and he will need to make cuts to pay for it. By 42–16, voters agreed with the Coalition’s attack line that this is the highest spending government in the past 40 years.

Additional Resolve questions and a right-wing poll of Wentworth

I previously covered the April 9–13 Resolve poll for Nine newspapers that gave Labor a 53.5–46.5 lead. Asked their biggest concerns about voting Labor, 47% said cost of living (down five since February), 36% economic management (down nine), 31% lack of progress in their first term (steady), 27% union ties (up two) and 24% Albanese’s personality (down six).

Asked their biggest concerns about voting for the Coalition, 45% said Dutton’s personality (up ten), 36% lack of policy detail (up eight), 34% that the Coalition would follow Donald Trump’s example (up six), 32% the performance of the Scott Morrison government (up four) and 31% their nuclear power plan (up five).

The February Resolve poll was the 55–45 to Coalition outlier, so responses in the prior survey were probably too Coalition-friendly.

The Poll Bludger reported Saturday that a seat poll of Wentworth, which teal Allegra Spender holds by a 55.9–44.1 margin over the Liberals after a redistribution, gave the Liberals a 47–28 primary vote lead over Spender with 15% for Labor and 10% for the Greens. This poll was taken by the right-wing pollster Compass.

Canadian election and UK local elections

I covered the April 28 Canadian election for The Poll Bludger on Saturday. The centre-left governing Liberals are down slightly since my previous Poll Bludger Canadian article on April 10, but are still likely to win a parliamentary majority. Debates between four party leaders occurred Wednesday (in French) and Thursday (in English), and we’re still waiting for post-debate polls.

United Kingdom local elections and a parliamentary byelection will occur on May 1. Current national polls imply that the far-right Reform will gain massively, with the Conservatives and Labour both slumping. Two seat polls give Reform a narrow lead over Labour for the parliamentary byelection in a safe Labour seat.

Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Politics

Pentagon clashes with Anthropic over AI safeguards amid Iran conflict

Pentagon vs. Anthropic: clash over AI’s role in military sparks ethical debate on autonomous weapons and privacy.

Published

on

Pentagon vs. Anthropic: clash over AI’s role in military sparks ethical debate on autonomous weapons and privacy.


The Pentagon and AI company Anthropic are clashing over the role of artificial intelligence in military operations. As bombs struck Iran, the Pentagon demanded Anthropic remove safeguards from its AI models, claiming the technology was involved in the campaign.

Anthropic refused, sparking a debate over ethics, accountability, and the limits of AI in defence.

Professor Chris Berg from RMIT University breaks down the Pentagon’s demands, the risk of contract termination, and what this conflict could mean for the future of autonomous weapons. The standoff underscores the tension between national security imperatives and public concerns about privacy and safety.

From AI safeguards to surveillance, this story examines the high-stakes battle between government authority and ethical tech.

Subscribe to never miss an episode of Ticker – https://www.youtube.com/@UCiMroZIXuwlSh1r5wZdeU6Q

#AIethics #NationalSecurity #Pentagon #Anthropic #AIinDefense #TechNews #PrivacyMatters #AutonomousWeapons


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Politics

Angus Taylor pushes bipartisan taskforce on carbon tariffs and spending cuts

Angus Taylor urges bipartisan collaboration on carbon tariffs, advocating for spending cuts to protect Australia’s economy and industries.

Published

on

Angus Taylor urges bipartisan collaboration on carbon tariffs, advocating for spending cuts to protect Australia’s economy and industries.


Opposition leader Angus Taylor is urging Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to form a bipartisan task force to tackle carbon tariffs and propose essential government spending cuts. Taylor argues that cross-party collaboration is crucial to safeguard Australian industries and the economy from escalating carbon-related costs.

Taylor highlights specific areas for spending reductions while emphasising the need for major parties to work together. His proposals aim to balance environmental responsibilities with economic growth, sparking debate on how Australia should navigate its carbon policy.

Professor Chris Berg from RMIT University discusses the implications of Taylor’s stance and what it could mean for Australia’s economic future.

Subscribe to never miss an episode of Ticker – https://www.youtube.com/@weareticker


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Politics

Sussan Ley faces leadership pressure amid coalition turmoil

Sussan Ley faces rising pressure as Liberal Party dissent grows; political stability at risk, per Chris Berg.

Published

on

Sussan Ley faces rising pressure as Liberal Party dissent grows; political stability at risk, per Chris Berg.


Liberal leader Sussan Ley is under growing pressure less than a year into her role, as internal party dissent intensifies and narratives form questioning her judgement. Political insiders suggest her leadership could face serious challenges in the coming months.

Professor Chris Berg from RMIT University breaks down the forces driving instability in Australian politics, examining how party dynamics and public perception influence leadership survival.

Subscribe to never miss an episode of Ticker – https://www.youtube.com/@weareticker

#SussanLey #AustralianPolitics #LiberalParty #LeadershipCrisis #PoliticalAnalysis #ChrisBerg #RMITUniversity #TickerNews


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Trending Now