In their second debate, Albanese and Dutton faced criticism, with pundits divided over who won; security heightened amid protests.

In Short

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton had a second leaders’ debate in Sydney, with analysts split on who performed better.

Both leaders claimed victory, but the lack of compelling visions for voters and key policy discussions left the debate’s impact unclear as elections approach.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton faced off in their second leaders’ debate, which took place at the ABC studios in Sydney. Unlike the first debate, there was no clear winner, with political analysts divided on who performed better.

READ MORE – What small business wants from this election

ABC political correspondent Melissa Clarke noted both leaders appeared defensive, resulting in a lack of compelling visions for voters. However, Sky’s Paul Murray strongly asserted that Dutton had outperformed Albanese.

Parties claim victory

Following the debate, both parties claimed victory, with Liberal Senator James Paterson accusing Albanese of dishonesty during the debate and Labor Treasurer Jim Chalmers asserting that Albanese’s calm approach had showcased a clear contrast between the two leaders.

Topics raised included Dutton’s recent admission of error regarding an alleged military agreement between Russia and Indonesia, and Albanese’s response to criticisms about his relationship with Indonesia.

Debates on energy policy, the housing crisis, and Indigenous relations also featured prominently.

Both leaders were questioned on their investments in housing and were pressed about their plans for the public service and budget deficits.