Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

News

Farmer owes US$61,000 in contract dispute over use of a ‘thumbs-up’ emoji, judge says

Published

on

A Canadian farmer owes CA$82,000 ($61,442) for breach of contract after using a “thumbs-up” in a text

In March 2021, a case was brought before the King’s Bench for Saskatchewan involving South West Terminal, Ltd. (SWT), grain purchasers, and farmers Bob and Chris Achter.

The dispute arose from a text message sent by SWT to grain suppliers, expressing interest in purchasing flax for $17 per bushel with delivery scheduled for October, November, or December of that year.

After phone conversations with the Achters, SWT drafted a contract for Chris Achter to sell 86 metric tons of flax to SWT at the agreed price, with delivery expected in November.

The SWT representative signed the contract and sent a photo of it via cell phone to Chris Achter, accompanied by a message requesting confirmation.

In response, Achter allegedly replied with a “thumbs-up” emoji, as per the court documents. However, Achter failed to deliver the flax in November 2021, by which time the price of flax had risen to $41 per bushel.

The SWT representative claimed in court documents that he had previously executed at least four other contracts with Achter through text messages, with the only difference this time being the use of the “thumbs-up” emoji instead of other affirmative responses like “ok” or “yup.”

However, Achter disputed the significance of the emoji, stating that it merely confirmed receipt of the contract and did not imply agreement with its terms.

He asserted that he expected the complete contract, including the full terms and conditions, to be sent to him for review and signing through fax or email.

Achter’s counsel argued that accepting the “thumbs-up” emoji as a substitute for a signature could lead to interpretational challenges with various other emojis, potentially inundating the courts with similar cases.

Additionally, Achter claimed that he would never sign a contract without an Act of God clause, as stated in the court documents.

The judge acknowledged that it appeared the deal was at least verbally agreed upon but ruled in favour of SWT, stating that Achter owed them CA$82,000 ($61,442) plus interest and costs for failing to deliver the flax.

In summary, the court case involved a dispute over whether the use of a “thumbs-up” emoji constituted a valid acceptance of a contract.

The judge determined that the deal was verbally struck, and Achter was found liable for not delivering the flax as agreed upon.

He wrote, “I am satisfied on the balance of probabilities that Chris okayed or approved the contract just like he had done before except this time he used a emoji. In my opinion, when considering all of the circumstances that meant approval of the flax contract and not simply that he had received the contract and was going to think about it. In my view a reasonable bystander knowing all of the background would come to the objective understanding that the parties had reached consensus ad item – a meeting of the minds – just like they had done on numerous other occasions.”

Continue Reading

News

White House blames Democrats for thousands of layoffs

Trump blames Democrats as White House layoffs thousands of federal workers amid ongoing government shutdown

Published

on

Trump blames Democrats as White House layoffs thousands of federal workers amid ongoing government shutdown

video
play-sharp-fill
In Short:
– Trump announced layoffs for thousands of government workers, blaming Democrats during the government shutdown.
– Job cuts affect multiple agencies, with unions filing lawsuits against the layoffs’ legality.
President Donald Trump announced layoffs affecting thousands of U.S. government workers, attributing the decision to Democrats during the ongoing government shutdown.Job cuts began at several federal agencies, including the Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Department of Health and Human Services, although the overall number of layoffs remains uncertain.

Banner

Roughly 300,000 federal workers were already anticipated to leave jobs this year due to a downsizing initiative by Trump.

The layoffs come as Trump continues to pressure Democrats for government funding. Republicans, holding majorities in Congress, require Democratic support in the Senate for funding measures.

Democrats insist they will not compromise under pressure, holding Republicans accountable for job losses. Labor unions have filed lawsuits against the layoffs, arguing their legality during the shutdown.

Job Cuts

A federal court will hear the case soon. Despite legal requirements for notification before layoffs, some officials have raised concerns over the impact on federal services.

Top Republican Senator Susan Collins expressed her objection to the layoffs, emphasising the importance of federal employees.

A White House budget director confirmed the initiation of layoffs, while many federal workers are either on furlough or working without pay. The Department of Health and Human Services is particularly affected, with a substantial number of staff receiving layoff notices.

Job reductions are also reported at the Education and Commerce Departments, among others. The Department of Homeland Security has made cuts in its cybersecurity division. However, the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration remain unaffected.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

News

Hamas trusts Trump, risks hostages for peace deal

Hamas trusts Trump to broker hostage deal as gamble for peace despite past concerns over Israeli actions

Published

on

Hamas trusts Trump to broker hostage deal as gamble for peace despite past concerns over Israeli actions

video
play-sharp-fill
In Short:
– Hamas called Trump a racist but believes he may help facilitate peace with Israel.
– Ongoing negotiations are uncertain, with Hamas optimistic despite lacking formal guarantees.
Hamas has called Donald Trump a racist and a “recipe for chaos.” However, a phone call from Trump convinced Hamas that he might facilitate a peace deal with Israel, even if they surrender their hostages.
Under the agreement, which began on Friday, Hamas will release hostages without a commitment from Israel to withdraw. This decision is seen as precarious, with fears that hostilities may resume post-release, similar to events following a previous ceasefire.Banner

During indirect negotiations, Trump’s involvement reportedly reassured Hamas leaders, bolstering their confidence in a lasting ceasefire.

Future Uncertain

Negotiations continue over details such as the timetable for Israeli troop withdrawal.

The mediating role of Qatar and Turkey has been pivotal, alongside U.S. participation, in moving discussions forward.

Hamas has shifted its stance on hostage retention, viewing it as detrimental to global support for their cause. Nonetheless, they received no formal guarantees regarding the progression towards a more comprehensive agreement to end the conflict.

Despite awareness of the risks involved in their gamble, Hamas leaders seem optimistic about ongoing talks, with pressures from mediators fostering a sense of seriousness in negotiations from both sides.

Trump’s anticipated visit to the region is expected to reinforce these developments, even as complexities remain in finalising the terms of the deal.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

News

Trump announces 100% tariff on China amid tensions

Trump announces 100% tariffs on China, imposing export controls after Beijing’s restrictions on rare-earth minerals escalate trade tensions

Published

on

Trump announces 100% tariffs on China, imposing export controls after Beijing’s restrictions on rare-earth minerals escalate trade tensions

video
play-sharp-fill
In Short:
– Trump plans a 100% tariff on China from November 1, sparking stock declines and heightening tensions.
– U.S.-China relations are strained, with potential severe impacts on U.S. industries due to export restrictions.
President Trump announced plans to impose a 100% additional tariff on China effective November 1, along with new export controls on crucial software products.
The decision follows China’s recent restrictions on rare-earth minerals, essential for industries like semiconductors and electric vehicles. Trump expressed disbelief over China’s actions, which have escalated tensions that had ostensibly improved after months of trade negotiations.Banner

The tariff announcement sparked a significant drop in U.S. stocks, marking the worst day for the S&P 500 since April.

While some administration officials advocate restarting trade talks from scratch, there is a looming opportunity for both countries to negotiate before the tariffs take effect. Trump left room for negotiations, suggesting the timeline could allow for de-escalation.

Export Controls

The conflict between the U.S. and China underscores the volatile relationship between the two major economies. Beijing’s decision to tighten export controls aims to leverage its position and weaken Trump’s negotiating stance.

The U.S. government is evaluating additional countermeasures and sanctions in response. Observers note that while both countries have expressed a desire for dialogue, securing an enduring agreement has proven challenging, with past resolutions quickly unraveling.

The potential implications of these export restrictions could be severe for various U.S. industries. Firms have warned about significant production halts if they cannot access critical rare-earth elements from China. Analysts suggest that the situation could compel both sides to reconsider their positions to prevent further economic fallout.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Trending Now