In Short:
– Cybersecurity should focus on human response rather than just human error to improve safety.
– Understanding emotional triggers can enhance training and interventions for better decision-making under stress.

On this episode of Ticker Clicks, host Jacqueline Jayne dives into the error of blaming human error. In cybersecurity, the focus on human error fails to address the real issue: human response.

Despite significant investments in training and awareness programs, the rate of human error remains unchanged. This indicates a need for a shift in perspective. Instead of blaming individuals for mistakes, organisations should analyse how people react in high-pressure situations.

Understanding emotional responses such as curiosity, urgency, and fear is crucial since these factors often lead to successful cybercrimes.

By integrating behavioural science and psychology, we can create better interventions that promote safer choices under stress. This includes simplifying decision-making and fostering secure habits.

In Short:
– Executives often misinterpret Human Risk Management as just compliance training, missing its business value.
– Leadership must engage in HRM to enhance security awareness and operational culture.

Human Risk Management (HRM) often faces misconceptions among executives, who tend to view it merely as compliance training. However, this perspective overlooks its potential value as a business enabler.

Ticker Clicks host Jacqueline Jayne is joined by Andrew Pedroso, Head of APAC at SoSafe to discuss the the link between HRM and tangible business outcomes. It requires a cultural shift within organisations, fundamentally changing how HRM is perceived and implemented.

Leadership Role

Senior leaders must actively participate in promoting HRM practices. This involves initiating discussions with IT departments and embedding security awareness into the company culture. A proactive approach from leadership ensures HRM transcends being a mere policy, evolving into a fundamental aspect of operations.

In conclusion, HRM is not solely a compliance matter; it is essential for protecting revenue, trust, and organisational culture. Leadership engagement is vital, so taking responsibility and initiating conversations within teams is encouraged to foster a security-conscious environment.

In Short:
– Online safety requires shared responsibility from parents, schools, governments, and tech companies.
– A cohesive approach is needed to enhance digital literacy and user security.

On this episode of Ticker Clicks, host Jacqueline Jayne asks the big questions: who is responsible for online safety?

As technology becomes integral to our lives, the question of shared responsibility grows more pressing. Everyone, from parents to tech companies, plays a role in online safety, yet clear structures are lacking.

To understand this, consider road safety: Parents educate children, schools reinforce lessons, and governments implement regulations.

In contrast, online safety lacks such a cohesive system.Parents often struggle to guide children on digital behaviour, while schools provide inconsistent lessons. Governments continue to lag in setting comprehensive protections, and tech companies frequently favour convenience over user safety.