Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

News

AG Bondi directs pause on funding for sanctuary cities

AG Pam Bondi directs DOJ to halt federal funding for sanctuary cities and aims to combat politicised justice.

Published

on

AG Pam Bondi directs DOJ to halt federal funding for sanctuary cities and aims to combat politicised justice.

In Short

Attorney General Pam Bondi has initiated substantial changes at the DOJ, halting funding for sanctuary cities and emphasising strict enforcement of federal laws while clarifying that personal views should not impact duties. She has also established a “Weaponization Working Group” to investigate potential political bias in prosecutions and ended the execution moratorium, signalling a notable shift in the department’s approach.

Attorney General Pam Bondi has begun her tenure by issuing significant directives focused on the enforcement of federal laws.

On her first day, Bondi ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) to pause all federal funding for sanctuary cities.

She emphasised the importance of “zealous advocacy” by DOJ attorneys, stating they must enforce criminal laws and defend presidential policies vigorously.

Bondi’s memo clarified that personal political views should not interfere with their responsibilities.

Failure to fulfill these duties could lead to disciplinary actions, including termination.

Additionally, Bondi plans to establish the “Weaponization Working Group” to investigate potential politicised justice in law enforcement over the last four years.

This group will scrutinise prosecutions involving former President Trump as well as various DOJ actions related to recent events, such as the Capitol riots and the targeting of specific groups.

Furthermore, Bondi announced the end of the federal execution moratorium, instructing federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty when warranted, particularly in violent drug trafficking cases.

Her directives mark a clear shift in the DOJ’s approach under her leadership, aiming to reinforce law enforcement’s commitment to the executive branch and ensure the integrity of its legal processes.

Bondi was confirmed by the Senate and sworn in, marking the start of a new chapter for the Justice Department.

Continue Reading

News

Appeals court halts Trump’s attempt to fire Cook

Appeals court blocks Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from Federal Reserve ahead of crucial interest rate meeting

Published

on

Appeals court blocks Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from Federal Reserve ahead of crucial interest rate meeting

video
play-sharp-fill
In Short:
– A federal appeals court has blocked Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve board.
– Trump’s expected Supreme Court appeal raises concerns about the Federal Reserve’s independence and market stability.
A federal appeals court has blocked President Donald Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve board.
The decision comes just before a crucial meeting regarding potential interest rate changes.The court determined that the Trump administration did not meet the requirements for an appeal against a prior ruling that had already blocked Cook’s removal.

Cook has faced allegations of mortgage fraud, which she denies. Her lawyers assert she has not committed any wrongdoing, and documentation reviewed by NBC News supports her position.

Banner

Trump is expected to appeal this ruling to the Supreme Court.

The legal context for Cook’s position at the Federal Reserve highlights that removal can only occur “for cause,” under the Federal Reserve Act. Analysts warn that firing Cook may destabilise the Federal Reserve, which is critical for market stability.

Legal Context

The Supreme Court has previously distinguished the Federal Reserve from other federal agencies, underlining its unique structure.

Concerns have escalated regarding the implications of Trump’s actions on the independence of the Federal Reserve and broader economic stability.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

News

Chinese auto brands dominate, taking one in five Aussie sales

Chinese car brands surge in Australia, capturing 20% market share with diverse offerings and aiming for expansion despite challenges

Published

on

Chinese car brands continue to rise in Australia, capturing 20% market share with a diverse range of EV offerings.

In Short:
– Over 20 Chinese car brands, including BYD and MG, are now available in Australia, with four in the top ten.
– Traditional automakers are adapting to increased competition and concerns about the quality of new Chinese entrants.

Australia is witnessing a significant increase in the presence of Chinese car brands, with over 20 names currently available, including BYD, GWM, and MG. In August, four Chinese brands ranked in the top ten for the first time, indicating a growing market share.Banner

Australia’s low trade barriers facilitate the entry of these brands, which view the market as an opportunity for growth and learning. Most electric vehicles sold outside of Tesla are Chinese, showcasing their dominance even in models from other manufacturers.

Industry analyst Mike Costello from Cox Automotive joins to discuss the latest developments in the EV space, and answers the big question: who was the dominate force at this year’s Munich Motor Show?

Continue Reading

Money

RBA plans to ban credit card surcharges in Australia

Reserve Bank of Australia plans to ban credit card surcharges despite banks warning of potential higher fees and weaker rewards

Published

on

Reserve Bank of Australia plans to ban credit card surcharges despite banks warning of potential higher fees and weaker rewards.

In Short:
– The RBA plans to ban surcharges on debit and credit card transactions, supported by consumer group Choice.
– Major banks oppose the ban, warning it could lead to higher card fees and reduced rewards for credit card users.

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) intends to implement a ban on surcharges associated with debit and credit card transactions. Consumer advocacy group Choice endorses this initiative, arguing that it is unjust for users of low-cost debit cards to incur similar fees as credit card holders.Banner

The major banks, however, are opposing this reform. They caution that the removal of surcharges could prompt customers to abandon credit cards due to diminished rewards.

A final decision by the RBA is anticipated by December 2025.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Trending Now