AUKUS allies have unveiled nuclear-powered submarine plans to counter China’s growing dominance
Australia will spend more than $365 billion on a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines under the most expensive defence project ever undertaken in the nation’s history.
Eight nuclear-propelled submarines—to be manufactured in Adelaide—will be expected to enter service in the 2040s.
Australia will also become the home for three second-hand Virginia-class submarines from the United States within the next decade.
It means Australia becomes the seventh country to acquire these nuclear-powered vessels.
The deal is the first major agreement reached under the AUKUS alliance between Australia, the United Kingdom and United States—a security and defence pact announced in 2021.
The plan lifts all three nations’ submarine industrial bases and undersea capabilities by enhancing deterrence and promoting stability in the Indo-Pacific region.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the deal comes amid rapidly shifting global dynamics in the region.
“This will be an Australian sovereign capability, commanded by the Royal Australian Navy and sustained by Australians in Australian shipyards, with construction to begin within this decade.”
Trilateral allies: the leaders of Australia, the United States and United Kingdom in San Diego.
Mr Albanese was standing next to U.S. President Joe Biden and UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in San Diego—the pulse of the U.S. Navy—where the trio spoke of the strength of their alliance.
“Today, as we stand at the inflection point in history, where the hard work of announcing deterrence and enhancing stability is going to reflect peace and stability for decades to come, the United States can ask for no better partners in the Indo-Pacific where so much of our shared future will be written.”
JOE BIDEN, U.S. PRESIDENT
The deal has largely attracted bipartisan support from lawmakers across the three continents. Australia’s Opposition Leader, Peter Dutton said the government deserves “full credit” for continuing the deal, after his Coalition lost the 2022 election.
“Regardless of the next election, if the Coalition is successful or not, AUKUS will continue and it must because the times demand it,” he said.
What are nuclear submarines?
These conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines will be modelled on a British design, and use the latest U.S. technology.
Dr John Coyne is from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, who said the deal is unprecedented.
“This is the most secretive project since World War Two, in terms of defence. The U.S. will be sharing nuclear technology, which in the past it has only shared with one other country, the UK.”
Unlike diesel-powered submarines, nuclear capability is built for endurance. The submarines boast longevity unmatched by others, which often need to resurface and refuel.
In fact, they can remain hidden at sea without detection for years. It means the length of any mission is dependent on whether the crew requires a break or supplies, or if the submarine encounters a fault.
Australia’s submarines will not be armed with nuclear weapons but they will have missile launch tubes on board.
“They’re nuclear-powered, not nuclear-armed. Australia is a proud non-nuclear weapons state and it’s committed to stay that way. These boats will not have any nuclear weapons of any kind on them,” President Biden said.
Why are they important?
The U.S. President spoke about the need for a “free and open, prosperous and secure” Indo-Pacific region.
He said the region should be “defined by opportunity for all”.
Meanwhile, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak shared some examples of the challenges facing AUKUS in the region.
“In the last 18 months the challenges we face have only grown.
“Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, China’s growing assertiveness, the destabilising behaviour of Iran and North Korea all threaten to create a world defined by danger, disorder, and division,” he said.
Australia’s fleet of nuclear-powered submarines could the key to defending the nation’s sovereignty if those challenges continue to escalate.
Australia will receive nuclear-powered submarines by the 2040s.
Each of the three AUKUS allies have a slightly different rationale for their involvement. However, Charles Edel from the Center for Strategic and International Studies said it boils down to one country.
“China was not mentioned when AUKUS was first announced, although the exponential growth of Beijing’s military power and it’s more aggressive use over the past decade was the clear animating force behind it.”
China has criticised the AUKUS Alliance. On Monday, President Xi Jinping vowed to build a “great wall of steel.”
The Chinese leader was speaking against the backdrop of his precedent-breaking third term as president.
“Security is the bedrock of development, while stability is a prerequisite for prosperity.”
XI JINPING, CHINESE PRESIDENT
“The great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation has entered an irreversible historical process,” he said.
What are the risks?
Public debate has been stirred as Australia, Britain and the U.S. emerge from the depths of Covid-19 economic instability.
Maria Rost Rublee, is an Associate Professor at Monash University, who said the deal poses risks for Australia.
“The AUKUS nuclear submarines face significant risks that originate from our sovereign defence capability of submarines relying so heavily on foreign governments, even close allies such as the United States and the UK.
“For example, the American technology control regime will require reform if AUKUS is to proceed, which is a matter for the U.S. Congress,” she said.
Costa is a news producer at ticker NEWS. He has previously worked as a regional journalist at the Southern Highlands Express newspaper. He also has several years' experience in the fire and emergency services sector, where he has worked with researchers, policymakers and local communities. He has also worked at the Seven Network during their Olympic Games coverage and in the ABC Melbourne newsroom.
He also holds a Bachelor of Arts (Professional), with expertise in journalism, politics and international relations. His other interests include colonial legacies in the Pacific, counter-terrorism, aviation and travel.
The global economy is undergoing rapid change — with breakthroughs in technology, shifts in trade policy, and renewed inflationary pressures all colliding.
In the U.S., the autonomous vehicle sector is accelerating after Waymo received key regulatory approval to expand its driverless services. The move could give Alphabet a competitive edge over rivals like GM’s Cruise, with the prospect of robotaxis generating real revenue on the horizon.
At the same time, fresh tariff threats are sparking alarm in the retail sector. Walmart has warned that new duties could trigger double-digit price hikes, putting pressure on consumers and potentially reshaping spending patterns, especially in electronics and apparel.
Meanwhile, the UK and EU have struck new trade agreements aimed at reducing red tape around food and emissions. The deals mark a step toward improved cooperation and could provide a modest economic boost for exporters.
With uncertainty still hanging over global markets, investors are once again turning to precious metals. Gold and silver are gaining attention as safe havens, with silver’s industrial use giving it added appeal in an uncertain climate.
Elon Musk says he’ll stay on as Tesla CEO for at least five more years, while scaling back political donations. Despite falling sales, he’s confident in Tesla’s global strength and hinted at a future Starlink listing—though legal hurdles remain.
In politics, the Nationals have split from the Coalition, with some Liberals calling it a vital reset. Former PM John Howard wants unity, but a party review is underway to regain younger, urban voters.
Australia’s central bank cut rates to 3.85% as inflation eases, though weak spending and global risks remain. GDP rose 1.3%, showing signs of recovery.
And in Victoria, a $167 billion debt budget sparked outrage, with protests over job cuts and a controversial tax as net debt is set to hit $194 billion by 2027.
Victoria’s budget forecasts record debt, proposes public sector job cuts, and faces criticism over tax increases and lack of clarity.
In Short:
Victorian Treasurer Jaclyn Symes has unveiled her first budget, projecting a $600 million surplus despite rising net debt and plans for significant public sector job cuts to save $3.3 billion. Reactions are mixed, with opposition leaders criticising increased taxation and insufficient focus on climate change, while some welcome funding for health and crime prevention.
Victorian Treasurer Jaclyn Symes has presented her first state budget, indicating a projected surplus of $600 million amidst soaring net debt, which is expected to reach $167.6 billion this year and further rise to $194 billion within three years.
The budget has flagged significant public sector job losses, with the government noting plans to save $3.3 billion by eliminating inefficiencies, although specific details on job cuts remain scarce. Symes mentioned that approximately 1,200 full-time equivalent positions are included in the savings, with additional cuts likely after a report from bureaucrat Helen Silver in June.
Debt bomb
Opposition Leader Brad Battin condemned the government’s approach to debt, arguing it burdens Victorians through increased taxation, particularly criticising the new Emergency Services Levy. The Greens have also expressed dissatisfaction, highlighting a lack of focus on climate change in the budget.
While the net debt is projected to remain stable, cost increases for state projects have amounted to $3.3 billion. Despite the looming cuts, the budget allocates substantial funds to health and crime prevention, including $11.1 billion for health services and $1.6 billion for crime reduction initiatives.
Tax revenue is expected to rise significantly, spurred by the Emergency Services and Volunteers Fund, which will place additional financial strain on landholders, particularly farmers. Reactions to the budget have been mixed, with some welcoming support for struggling families, while others decry job cuts and insufficient investment in regional development.