Solomon Islands Prime Minster concludes his second overseas trip in a week as strategic competition heightens
It’s hard to believe a time when leaders from the Pacific jumped on board their emissions-spurting jets to meet with the U.S. President.
But last week 12 leaders from across the Pacific gathered in Washington to meet with President Joe Biden in the first U.S.-Pacific Island Country Summit.
“We honoured the history and values that our nations share and expanded our cooperation on key areas that will benefit our people for years to come,” President Biden said.
What was the meeting about?
Leaders from Fiji, Solomon Islands, Palau and the Federated States of Micronesia were among the guests at the summit.
They discussed maritime security, climate change, and economic development.
Of course, climate change is a crucial issue for these Pacific Island states, many of which are low-lying and vulnerable to the impacts of rising temperatures and sea levels.
These countries are already experiencing higher temperatures, shifts in rainfall patterns, and rising sea levels.
There are also long-term climate variables, which are expected to occur in the future.
The U.S. believes the summit was a platform to “reaffirm its commitment to the Pacific region” and “strengthen its relationships”.
But it was only a matter of time before the climate guise was dropped.
Security is the key word here, because President Biden’s definition of this, may differ from the low-lying states of the Pacific.
Foreign Minister Jeremiah Manele said he watered down the initial language because it “put us in a position where we’d have to choose sides”.
He added there were “indirect” references to China, however, officials later found “common ground” and Solomon Islands signed up.
It’s no surprise Sogavare was then seen standing next to President Joe Biden for the official photo at last week’s Washington Summit. Fiji’s leader Frank Bainimarama was also strategically on the other side.
It was the first time in 40 years where a Fijian Prime Minister had an official audience with the U.S. President.
Why is Solomon Islands at the centre of this?
Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare met with Australia’s leader Anthony Albanese in Canberra today, where the pair reiterated their relationship as “proud Pacific nations”.
Australia remains Solomon Islands’ largest development partner. But Sogavare’s state visit largely remained behind closed doors, with no media opportunities scheduled.
Prime Minister Sogavare welcomed Australia’s $16.68 million commitment to support the 2023 Pacific Games, and offer to support the next Solomon Islands’ election—an issue where earlier friction was caused.
Sogavare’s visit was part of Canberra’s plan to reduce friction between the two nation.
Earlier this year, Honiara signed a security alliance with Beijing. It stirred a diplomatic pot over concerns a Chinese military base could be established on the island nation.
Australia’s then-Prime Minister Scott Morrison asked for greater transparency over the deal.
But Sogavare lashed out at Australian officials in his nation’s parliament, asking where the same transparency was over the AUKUS alliance between Australia, Britain and the U.S.
The recent Washington summit was the perfect opportunity for President Biden to roll out the red carpet and discuss his administration’s plans for the Indo-Pacific region.
On the other hand, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it “will keep in close communication with all parties” and “make good use of the mechanism of China-Pacific Island Countries Foreign Ministers’ Meeting”.
Costa is a news producer at ticker NEWS. He has previously worked as a regional journalist at the Southern Highlands Express newspaper. He also has several years' experience in the fire and emergency services sector, where he has worked with researchers, policymakers and local communities. He has also worked at the Seven Network during their Olympic Games coverage and in the ABC Melbourne newsroom.
He also holds a Bachelor of Arts (Professional), with expertise in journalism, politics and international relations. His other interests include colonial legacies in the Pacific, counter-terrorism, aviation and travel.
Trump Tours Palisades Fire Damage, Meets Gov. Newsom to Discuss Recovery Efforts After Criticism of Response.
President Donald Trump arrived at Los Angeles International Airport to assess the damage caused by the Palisades Fire in Pacific Palisades.
He was welcomed by California Governor Gavin Newsom, and the two exchanged pleasantries before addressing reporters.
Trump expressed appreciation for Newsom’s presence, stating, “We want to get the problem fixed. It’s like you got hit by a bomb.”
Governor Newsom thanked Trump for visiting the affected area and acknowledged the significant impact of the disaster.
He highlighted the need for federal support and emphasized the importance of collaboration for recovery. Newsom recalled Trump’s assistance during the COVID pandemic, expressing his hope for a cooperative effort moving forward.
Both leaders acknowledged the severe situation in Palisades and surrounding areas like Altadena, where residents are in need of help. This meeting aims to foster a partnership to address the aftermath of the wildfires.
Musk’s Air Force One visit highlights Boeing’s struggles with delays and budget issues amid fierce competition from SpaceX.
On December 18, Musk visited Boeing’s military aircraft facility in San Antonio, Texas.
The billionaire, assigned by former US President Donald Trump to reduce government inefficiency, arrived in his Gulfstream G650.
Elon Musk visits the Boeing factory in Texas.
He came to review the new version of Air Force One, which is significantly delayed and facing a budget overrun of $2.7 billion.
This situation has become a significant issue for Boeing’s CEO, Kelly Ortberg.
Musk’s involvement is particularly striking given that his company, SpaceX, competes directly with Boeing in the aerospace sector.
His inspection of the presidential jet highlights the challenges Boeing faces in fulfilling government contracts amidst high expectations and critical scrutiny.
Putin claims Ukraine crisis stems from Trump’s 2020 election loss, expresses readiness for negotiations with the new US president.
Vladimir Putin stated that the Ukraine conflict could have been prevented if Donald Trump had won the 2020 election.
He described the ongoing war as a ‘crisis’ and expressed that the bloodshed in eastern Europe might not have occurred under a Trump presidency. Putin praised Trump as ‘smart and pragmatic’ and indicated his openness to negotiations concerning Ukraine.
Despite this, remarks from Putin’s Foreign Ministry criticized Western arms supply to Ukraine and questioned the legitimacy of the Ukrainian government.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s office insisted that any peace talks would require European representation.
Trump had previously claimed he could resolve the war quickly if he had been president. Just after beginning his second presidential term, there have been no signs of an imminent resolution to the conflict.
He recently warned Putin of potential taxes and sanctions if Russia does not agree to peace talks.
Advisers suggested that military aid to Ukraine could be curtailed if Kyiv does not agree to a deal. Trump criticised Zelensky, implying that the Ukrainian leader should have prevented the war.
Political analysts doubt Trump’s ability to end the conflict swiftly, highlighting Russia’s advantageous position in negotiations. However, some in Ukraine remain cautiously optimistic that a Trump presidency could offer a better alternative to the current situation under President Biden.