UK loses effort to keep Apple’s appeal against iPhone ‘backdoor’ demand secret, reinforcing open justice principles.
In Short
Apple has won a legal battle against the U.K. government, which sought to keep details of its appeal regarding a demand for access to iPhone data secret.
The court ruled that public interest in transparency outweighs national security concerns associated with the request for a ‘backdoor’ to Apple’s encryption.
Apple has successfully challenged the U.K. government’s attempt to keep details of its appeal over a demand for a ‘backdoor’ to iPhone users’ data confidential.
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal ruled on Monday against the government’s request to prevent public disclosure of the appeal’s hearing details, citing that it would violate the principle of open justice.
Judges Rabinder Singh and Jeremy Johnson stated that conducting a secret hearing would be an extraordinary breach of transparency.
The U.K. government’s request was based on concerns regarding national security. However, the court concluded that public interest outweighed these concerns.
Encrypted data
The appeal is related to a request for Apple to permit officials to access encrypted data on iPhones through a technical ‘backdoor.’
This backdoor would compromise Apple’s Advanced Data Protection system, which provides end-to-end encryption for iCloud data.
Governments in multiple areas, including the U.S. and EU, have expressed frustration with end-to-end encryption, claiming it benefits those engaged in criminal activities.
