As multiple countries across the world follow the United States’ move to boycott China’s 2022 Beijing Olympics, is China really phased by the action?
Canada and the UK are the latest to join a growing list of countries including the United States, Australia and New Zealand in not sending government officials to the games next year.
Most nations, besides New Zealand have cited China’s human rights abuses as the reason for their boycott, as tensions between western nations and the communist nation continue to escalate at rapid speed.
Canada is the most recent to join the boycott, with government officials stating that they are continuously disappointed that China has failed to act on its human rights record.
Speaking to reporters in Ottawa on Wednesday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Canada would not be sending an official delegation to the games, which will be held from February 4 to 20 in the Chinese capital.
Does China really care?
China has responded to the diplomatic action, but insist they ‘aren’t phased’ – instead the Chinese government says they’ll responsive action to those that continue to boycott.
China’s foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian told reporters that the United States is attempting to interfere with the Games “out of ideological prejudice and based on lies and rumours.”
The spokesperson said China would respond with “resolute countermeasures,” with no further information on what those measures will be.
Mr Zhao then went on to tell the United States to “stop politicizing sports” and to stop, in his words, undermining the Olympics. He continued, saying, “otherwise it will undermine the dialogue and cooperation between the two countries in a series of important areas and international issues.
The comments from China come as Australia’s Prime Minister stated that his country will be making a stance against China, but reiterated that players from Oz will still compete.
“China and the West”
Speaking to ticker NEWS, the Australia Institute’s Ebony Bennett says the situation has now become about China vs the West.
“It isn’t a good look for China”
“China has responded aggressively rejecting that all these assertions that there is human rights abuses in China to begin with”
Australia has been mocked by China over its decision to follow the United States and announce a diplomatic boycott of the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympic Games.
Chinese newspaper The Global Times shared two cartoons on their website, depicting what it described as Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s “lack of an independent policy” and “acting as a henchman” of the US.
The first image shared to Twitter showed a kangaroo holding a balloon emblazoned with the US flag floating in the sky.
The account shared a post from Sydney Morning Herald on the news of the boycotting, captioning it “No.1 Us lackey,” alongside hand clapping emojis.
Who is PewDiePie and what’s his net worth?
Felix Kjellberg, popularly known as PewDiePie, is a Swedish YouTube sensation who has risen to fame as one of the most prominent content creators on the platform.
With millions of dedicated fans worldwide, he has become a household name.
PewDiePie’s journey to stardom began in 2010 when he started creating videos centered around gaming, commentary, and humor. His charismatic and relatable persona resonated with viewers, propelling him to unparalleled success. Over the years, he diversified his content to include vlogs, reviews, and a wide range of entertainment.
One of the defining moments of PewDiePie’s career was his “T-Series vs. PewDiePie” battle in 2019, where he competed with the Indian music label T-Series for the title of the most subscribed YouTube channel. This event garnered immense attention and support from his fans, further solidifying his status as an internet icon.
Now, as of 2021, PewDiePie’s net worth stands at a staggering $40 million, thanks to various revenue streams such as ad revenue, merchandise sales, and sponsorships. He’s not only a YouTube star but also a successful entrepreneur, with his own line of merchandise and a book.
PewDiePie’s journey is a testament to the power of online content creation and the immense influence YouTubers can have on global audiences. As he continues to evolve and adapt to the ever-changing landscape of online media, one thing remains clear – PewDiePie is here to stay.
Elon Musk raves about “next-level” Tesla Cybertruck performance
Elon Musk expressed his excitement about the upcoming Tesla Cybertruck Performance version, declaring it to be a game-changer in the electric vehicle industry.
With just seven words, Musk summed up his enthusiasm: “It kicks ass next-level.”
Musk’s comment came during a press conference where he discussed the latest advancements in Tesla’s electric vehicle lineup. The Tesla Cybertruck has been a highly anticipated release since its initial unveiling, and the Performance version promises to take things to a whole new level.
According to Musk, the Tesla Cybertruck Performance will feature cutting-edge technology and performance capabilities that will exceed all expectations. While specific details about the vehicle remain limited, Musk hinted at its impressive acceleration, handling, and range, suggesting that it will outperform any other electric truck on the market.
The Tesla Cybertruck has already generated a significant amount of pre-orders, and with Musk’s endorsement of the Performance version, it’s likely to attract even more attention from consumers and investors alike. This announcement could also have a positive impact on Tesla’s stock price, as it demonstrates the company’s commitment to innovation and its ability to stay ahead of the competition.
As Tesla continues to push the boundaries of electric vehicle technology, the Tesla Cybertruck Performance version is set to be a standout addition to their lineup. With Elon Musk’s stamp of approval, it’s safe to say that the electric truck market is about to witness a significant shake-up.
The rise of the apologetic CEO
We now live in the era of the apologetic CEO, but do those words have meaning and consequences?
There was a time when CEOs bore the stiff upper lip. Never explain, never complain. It worked for hundreds of years, essentially telling customers and employees “We are trying our best, but if you don’t like it, leave”. Hold the line.
But the Covid pandemic, and the rise of the Teflon-politician plus social media, have now changed business and the way a CEO and their company deals with the outside world.
Sorry now seems to be the easiest word.
It works like this:
- Major stufff up that the company expects will go unnoticed
- Denial of the stuff up or silence
- Public and then political backlash
- CEO accidentally says something publicly that makes it worse
- Board intervenes
- CEOs top media team hire external crisis comms team to fix things
- External camera crew hired and sets up in the lobby of corporate HQ or on the factory floor
- CEO makes a grovelling apology trying to connect with customers.
But what does it do to fix the original crisis? And has it become a cynical attempt at being seen to take ownership (the buck stops with me), but then nothing happens?
The Qantas case
Qantas prides itself as the national flag carrier, even though it’s a publicly listed company now. But it finds itself constantly caught in the grips of customers, unions, the media and the government.
Following the pandemic, Qantas found itself in a world of pain. On the plus side, travel was back in a big way and the profits would soon follow. In this instance, it was better to be the CFO than the CEO.
Qantas stood down thousands of workers, many of whom left the relatively low-paying fickle aviation industry for higher-paying, stable jobs on the other side of “air side”.
I recently met a tram driver who used to be a Qantas International pilot. Instead of trekking to Melbourne airport to start work, he now begins his shift by meeting the tram at the end of his street. Basically, the staff moved on.
As the post-covid era rolled along, bags were lost, flights were canceled and angry customers vented to the media, then-CEO Alan Joyce ran through the “PR crisis handbook” outlined above.
Deny, blame, admit, move on.
Here was Alan Joyce’s apology in August 2022:
“On behalf of the national carrier, I want to apologise and assure you that we’re working hard to get back to our best.”
Fast forward to this month, and Alan Joyce is out at Qantas. His replacement is his CFO, Vanessa Hudson.
CFOs focus on operations and streamlining processes but sometimes struggle with human connection. A CEO has to put everybody first, but a CFO has to put the company first.
Vanessa Hudson is a lower-profile CEO than Joyce, so far avoiding the spotlight, or being seen mingling with celebrity chefs.
A year after Joyce’s apology, Ms Hudson recorded a video statement to customers:
“I was a part of the leadership at the time, but clearly I wasn’t the chief executive then. I am the chief executive now and what I would say is that I would like to be judged by what we do now and how we behave going forward.”
While the CEO has changed, the messaging has not. This may soon happen, as Vanessa Hudson grows into the role and identifies people who need to be moved on and people who need to be moved in.
But once she builds the right team, listen to them. Often CEOs ignore internal advice and only listen to external consultants.
For passengers though, what difference does an apology make? What happened in that year after Alan Joyce apologied that made Qantas better for today?
Historically when Qantas has been in trouble, they unleash another rendition of I Still Call Australia Home during some sort of sports final.
It’s like the partner who keeps breaking trust and continually begs for forgiveness. It’s time to pack your bags and burn that red flag.
The Qantas dilemma
Qantas has some big issues that will take decades to fix. Airlines are slow-moving beasts.
Aside from the huge debt burden, unions that are bolstered by a High Court win, plus favourable governments running the country and the states, and an angry customer base ready to rock up with pitchforks, there are even more fundamental issues facing the new CEO.
Australians are famously egalitarian. We demand high service at a low cost, and we’re not afraid of complaining until things are changed. That’s how we’ve built this great nation and keep rolling Prime Ministers.
Jumbo sized problem
For decades, Qantas has been stuck with the wrong-sized planes. Not since the 747 has there been an aircraft that meets the comfort needs of passengers and the budgets of airlines at the same time.
Airlines have been demanding more fuel-efficient planes and aircraft manufacturers are trying to squeeze more range out of smaller carbon fibre frames.
Anyone who has flown a 787 Dreamliner will soon forget the LED windows, and remember how much more space there was on a 747 or A380. Anyone who has dropped an Airpod in economy knows what I’m talking about.
Australians are big people who require big planes and bigger seats with wider pitch.
Australia is a long way from anywhere. As is New Zealand, yet Air New Zealand has come up with far more innovative ways to keep passengers comfortable on long-haul flights than Qantas.
The airline industry has been marching to the same tune for decades, since the emergence of RyanAir and Southwest. Cheaper flights, poorer service, and a relationship with customers that is cost-based, not value-based. The rise of airport security only tipped the scales even further towards mean airlines.
For those times, Joyce was the right CEO for Qantas, as he had successfully built up Jetstar in Australia. And frankly, Qantas couldn’t carry on running as a government-funded airline.
The Crying CEO
Qantas is an example but far from the only company that struggles with its messaging. There are the CEOs that go even further.
Remember the CEO who took to LinkedIn to post a weeping selfie after making the decision to make staff redundant?
Braden Wallake runs the Ohio-based business-to-business marketing agency Hypersocia. The post received more than 6,700 comments and nearly 33,000 reactions.
Some LinkedIn users mocked Wallake’s post, calling him “out of touch” and “cringe-worthy” or suggested that he should focus on helping his former employees rather than on how the situation had affected him.
New CEOs Building Trust
The appointment of a new CEO marks a significant transition that can shape the future of an organisation.
Upholding a strong ethical compass reassures stakeholders that the CEO will make decisions aligned with the organisation’s core beliefs. This builds trust over time.
The CEO’s track record and expertise play a pivotal role. In the case of Vanessa Hudson, this will be her most difficult task, given she was holding the financial levers at the airline.
Apologising is good spin, but action is a must.
First home purchases cost 60% more than renting in most cities
UPS is using AI to thwart package theft
How much money you need to earn to be “officially rich”
Crypto.com accidentally transfers $10.5m to woman instead of $100
What is happening between SHIB and Vitalik? | TICKER VIEWS
Russia has cancelled itself. But the world should beware of poking the Russian bear￼
Money5 days ago
Top 5 simple digital nomad jobs for newbies
Originals5 days ago
How will the energy market change
News2 days ago
Why regulators are targeting board execs for cyber security failures
Money5 days ago
Meta offers employee benefits following mass layoffs
News4 days ago
Millennials are suddenly ditching the Bali nomad lifestyle
News1 day ago
Tim Cook joins NYC iPhone 15 launch, draws global crowds
Money5 days ago
Dominant oil cartel’s grip on fuel prices may weaken
News4 days ago
How can AI sound more human?