Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

Politics

How much can Jim Chalmers get out of the economic reform roundtable?

Published

on

We’re now less than a month away from the start of the Albanese government’s “economic reform” (aka “productivity”) roundtable, but it has become quite hard to get a fix on exactly what this gathering will amount to.

Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra

The guest list for the August 19-21 summit is obviously tight, given the government decided it wanted the meeting to fit into the cabinet room (so avoiding a more extensive “talkfest”).

But excluding the states and territories from a meeting that discusses deregulation and taxation means major players in these policy areas are not in the room (the NSW treasurer, Daniel Mookhey, chair of the board of treasurers, is the only state government representative invited). Treasurer Jim Chalmers says he will meet state treasurers beforehand, but that doesn’t quite cover their omission.

The government has flagged that industrial relations isn’t on the table, although the unions will be at that table. Yet IR is a major issue in productivity, so that excludes a central area from discussion. The unions are being given a level of protection other players potentially do not have.

Tax reform is a central topic at the roundtable, the themes of which are productivity, budget sustainability and economic resilience. But the scope of what is up for serious consideration is limited.

The government is not willing to consider changing the GST, even if it is not formally ruling out it being canvassed.

When it was put to him that he opposed altering the GST, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told the ABC this week what he would not do was “go to an election and secure a majority because our government concentrated on cost-of-living measures in our first term […] and immediately we get elected and we say, we’re going to put up the price of everything that you buy.

“That is not something that’s tenable. That’s something which would have represented a breach of trust upon which we were elected on May 3rd.”

Rejecting an overhaul of the GST kyboshes, for better or worse, a major tax switch from our over-reliance on personal income tax to putting more of the tax burden on indirect tax. This is a change many tax experts advocate.

Despite the hype around the pre-roundtable discussion of broad tax reform, what appears likely to find favour with the government are tax changes affecting wealth (but excluding the family home) and the resources sector.

It remains unclear to what extent Chalmers will seek to define the outcome beforehand. That is: will he, after reviewing the submissions, go into the roundtable with a firm idea of what he wants to get out of it, and then see how much he can get over the “consensus” line?

Helpfully for everyone at the roundtable, the Productivity Commission is about to release a series of reports on various aspects of productivity, which will provide data and ideas.

These cover economic resilience, improving workforce skills and adaptability, harnessing digital technology, improving care delivery, and investing in the net zero transformation.

Meanwhile business, which felt it was made something of a patsy in the 2022 jobs and skills summit, with the government using that meeting to gain traction for what it already wanted to do, is being cautious this time.

Even before the formal announcement of the roundtable, it set up a group following the government’s nomination of productivity as a central priority for this term. The umbrella body’s first meeting was attended by more than 20 groups representing businesses of all sizes, universities and the investment community. This body is ongoing. It includes the Business Council of Australia, the Australian Industry Group, the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Minerals Council of Australia and the Council of Small Business Organisations.

The umbrella body will put forward a suite of recommendations for the roundtable including on investment, innovation, reducing red tape, planning and approval processes, tax, education and employment.

We now have the full list of roundtable participants. It’s interesting for who’s there and who’s not. Ken Henry, of the seminal Henry taxation report – of which Chalmers has vivid memories from his days as a staffer of former treasurer Wayne Swan – will be present. Henry last week gave a strong presentation at the National Press Club about the pressing need for reform of the environment protection regime.

Also scoring an invitation is teal crossbencher Allegra Spender, who made tax reform one of her core issues last term. Spender is holding her own “tax reform roundtable” on Friday, with a who’s who of experts.

But left off the Treasurer’s invitation list list was the Minerals Council of Australia. This despite the fact that tax changes in the resources area seem a ripe area for discussion.The Conversation

Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Politics

Nigeria disputes Trump’s genocide claims amid airstrikes

Nigeria dismisses Trump’s genocide claim, emphasising equal impact of violence on Muslims and Christians amid complex security crisis

Published

on

Nigeria dismisses Trump’s genocide claim, emphasising equal impact of violence on Muslims and Christians amid complex security crisis

video
play-sharp-fill
In Short:
– Nigerian officials refute Trump’s claims about U.S. airstrikes, emphasising that violence affects both Christians and Muslims equally.
– Data shows the narrative of Christian genocide in Nigeria misrepresents reality, with most victims having no tracked affiliations.

Nigeria has strongly rejected President Donald Trump’s claim that U.S. airstrikes in the country were necessary to stop a genocide targeting Christians. Nigerian officials insist the violence in northwestern Nigeria affects both Muslim and Christian communities and is driven by complex security and ethnic challenges rather than religion.

Foreign Minister Yusuf Tuggar told the BBC that the attacks are about “protecting Nigerians and innocent lives, whether Nigerian or non-Nigerian,” emphasizing that the strikes, which targeted ISIS-affiliated militants in Sokoto State on Christmas Day, were part of broader efforts to combat terrorism. Trump had claimed that militants were primarily killing Christians at “levels not seen for many years, and even centuries,” but Nigerian authorities reject this characterization.

Data from the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project shows that more Muslims than Christians have been killed in targeted attacks between January 2020 and September 2025, casting doubt on claims of a systematic Christian genocide. Bulama Bukarti, a Nigerian human rights advocate, highlighted that in Sokoto State, attacks such as suicide bombings often kill civilians indiscriminately, impacting both Muslim and Christian populations.

Security crisis

Analysts stress that Nigeria’s security crisis is multifaceted, involving extremist groups like Boko Haram, Islamic State West Africa Province, and others, as well as longstanding ethnic and resource-based conflicts between predominantly Muslim herders and Christian farming communities. Bishop Matthew Hassan Kukah, who leads a diocese in the affected area, also confirmed that the region “does not have a problem with persecution” of Christians.

The Nigerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs reiterated that terrorist violence against any community is unacceptable and that the government remains committed to protecting all Nigerians, regardless of religion. Officials warn that framing the crisis through a simplistic religious lens risks deepening sectarian divisions and undermining local efforts to address the broader security threats.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Politics

Thailand and Cambodia agree to ceasefire after clashes

Thailand and Cambodia agree to ceasefire, ending border clashes that claimed over 100 lives and displaced half a million residents

Published

on

Thailand and Cambodia agree to a ceasefire, ending border clashes that claimed over 100 lives and displaced half a million residents

video
play-sharp-fill
In Short:
– Thailand and Cambodia have signed a ceasefire to end a three-week border conflict, causing over 100 deaths.
– The agreement mandates an immediate halt to hostilities and maintains current troop levels.

Thailand and Cambodia have signed a ceasefire agreement aimed at ending nearly three weeks of intense border clashes that killed more than 100 people and displaced more than half a million civilians. The agreement was signed on Saturday at a border checkpoint in Thailand’s Chanthaburi province by senior defence officials from both countries and came into effect at noon local time on December 27.

The joint statement calls for an immediate halt to all military activity, including the use of heavy weapons, airstrikes and attacks on civilian areas and infrastructure. Both sides also agreed to maintain their current troop deployments, warning that any further movement or reinforcement could escalate tensions and undermine longer-term peace efforts.

The latest fighting erupted in early December after the collapse of a previous ceasefire agreement brokered in October by US President Donald Trump and Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. That truce unravelled following a landmine incident in November that injured several Thai soldiers, reigniting long-standing tensions along the 800-kilometre shared border.

Humanitarian crisis

Clashes quickly escalated between December 7 and 8, with F-16 airstrikes, artillery barrages and rocket fire reported across multiple border provinces. Cambodia reported at least 18 civilian deaths by mid-December, while Thailand confirmed military casualties of at least 21 soldiers. The violence triggered a major humanitarian crisis, forcing nearly 500,000 Cambodians and more than 150,000 Thais to flee their homes and seek refuge in government-run shelters.

Diplomatic pressure intensified in the days leading up to the ceasefire. Talks were held under the General Border Committee framework between December 24 and 26, while ASEAN foreign ministers convened an emergency meeting in Kuala Lumpur, urging both countries to exercise maximum restraint and honour previous peace commitments.

Fragile truce

The dispute between Thailand and Cambodia has deep historical roots, stemming from disagreements over colonial-era border demarcations and competing claims over ancient temple sites, including the Preah Vihear temple. Although the International Court of Justice ruled in Cambodia’s favour in 1962 and again in 2013, tensions have periodically flared into violence.

Thai Defence Minister Natthaphon Narkphanit said the ceasefire would be closely monitored over the next 72 hours, as both sides assess whether the fragile truce can hold after months of escalating hostilities.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump and Albanese sign rare-earth deal: What it means for U.S.-Australia relations

Trump and Albanese’s rare-earth deal reshapes U.S.-Australia relations amid rising geopolitical challenges.

Published

on

Trump and Albanese’s rare-earth deal reshapes U.S.-Australia relations amid rising geopolitical challenges.


In a groundbreaking meeting in Washington, U.S. President Donald Trump and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese signed a historic rare-earth deal that marks a significant shift in the relationship between the two nations. This agreement signals a potential alignment amid growing concerns over defense, technology, and foreign policy. As both countries face shifting geopolitical dynamics, this deal could redefine their strategic collaboration.

The U.S. and Australia have long been key allies in countering China’s influence, especially in the Indo-Pacific region. This deal, which focuses on rare-earth materials crucial for defense and technology sectors, demonstrates how both nations are looking to strengthen their ties. Australia’s role as a strategic partner is now more critical than ever, with the growing influence of China posing a shared challenge.

Chris Berg, an expert from RMIT University, discusses the implications of this partnership, including its impact on Australia’s security needs and its relationship with the U.S. regarding Taiwan, the Middle East, and the broader Indo-Pacific. From the AUKUS agreement to the U.S.-Australia approach to Palestine, these issues are shaping the future direction of bilateral relations.

Subscribe to never miss an episode of Ticker – https://www.youtube.com/@weareticker

#AustraliaUSRelations #RareEarthDeal #TrumpAlbanese #USAlliance #Geopolitics #IndoPacific #AUKUS #MiddleEastEurope


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Trending Now