Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

News

Donald Trump is back with his X. What happens next?

Published

on

In a highly-anticipated move, former President Donald Trump has made his reentry onto X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter.

This significant development comes nine months after entrepreneur Elon Musk reinstated Trump’s account on the platform, sparking speculation about the impact it might have on the company, especially in the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election where Trump is a front-runner for the Republican nomination.

Trump, who boasts nearly 87 million followers, was once one of Twitter’s most prominent, albeit controversial, users. His return to the platform carries the potential to attract a diverse audience, potentially reshaping the trajectory of X after months of turbulence. However, it also poses a new set of challenges, including implications for the platform’s advertising business, should Trump decide to resume regular posting.

First posting

On Thursday night, Trump posted on the platform for the first time since January 2021, when he was suspended for violating Twitter’s rules against the glorification of violence following the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. His return post featured a photo of his mug shot from his surrender in Georgia, where he faces over a dozen charges related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, along with a link to a fundraiser.

Elon Musk, the owner of X, appeared to welcome Trump’s return, sharing the former president’s post with the caption “Next-level.” Musk later lauded the platform’s reach, alluding to Trump’s ability to swiftly disseminate messages to a vast audience.

The X problem

If Trump chooses to actively engage on X, it could significantly bolster the platform’s efforts to attract and retain users, particularly in the face of mounting competition. After controversial policy decisions by Musk, several Twitter alternatives have emerged, including Meta’s Threads, which recently introduced a major update.

Notably, during the week of July 17, web traffic to the platform previously known as Twitter declined by over 9% compared to the same period in the previous year, as reported by Similarweb, a web traffic intelligence firm.

Musk’s changes at X have also unsettled some advertisers, impacting the platform’s core business.

During his presidency, Trump’s tweets often influenced financial markets, dominated news cycles, and shaped the political agenda, driving user engagement on the platform. His return could potentially recreate this dynamic, particularly as he pursues the 2024 Republican nomination.

Increased ngagement

While increased engagement could attract advertisers back to the platform, Trump’s return also raises concerns for brands, some of whom have scaled back their spending on X due to fears of their ads appearing alongside controversial or objectionable content. Musk recently acknowledged a 50% decline in revenue from the platform’s core ad business, although CEO Linda Yaccarino later indicated that the company was nearing a break-even point.

X’s leadership has introduced new brand safety controls to reassure advertisers, but a couple of brands paused their spending on the platform when their ads were displayed alongside content celebrating the Nazi party. X took action by suspending the account and reported minimal ad impressions on the offending page.

During his active years on Twitter, Trump pushed the boundaries of the platform’s content moderation policies, often enjoying a lighter approach to moderation due to his status as a public official. With his return to X, there is the possibility that Trump might revert to his previous habits, such as making false claims about the 2020 election. Musk could find himself in the position of deciding whether to risk alienating additional advertisers or compromising his commitment to “free speech.”

Continue Reading

News

Trump’s trade war may impact Australian medicine prices

Trump’s trade war could raise Australian medicine costs and limit availability, complicating PBS negotiations and tariff impacts.

Published

on

Trump’s trade war could raise Australian medicine costs and limit availability, complicating PBS negotiations and tariff impacts.

In Short

Concerns arise in Australia over a US-Australia trade dispute affecting medicine costs and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Potential US tariffs could raise drug prices and impact access, despite the US arguing for higher prices to reflect drug development costs.

Talks of a trade dispute between the US and Australia regarding medicine costs have raised concerns among Australians.

The potential impact on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and tariffs on Australian drugs entering the US raises questions about drug prices and availability.

The PBS offers subsidised medicines, maintaining low out-of-pocket costs for consumers. Drug companies must submit evidence to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), which assesses the cost-effectiveness of drugs.

Donald Trump’s imposition of tariffs could prompt a rise in medicine prices or lead to shortages. Price negotiations occur between the government and drug companies, with consumers paying a fixed co-payment regardless of the drug’s cost to the government.

The US argues the PBS undervalues innovative drugs, seeking higher prices that reflect development costs. However, the PBAC aims to keep prices low, benefiting consumers.

Tariffs on Australian pharmaceuticals exported to the US could hike prices and reduce demand for Australian-made drugs, although most medicines in Australia are sourced overseas.

Even if Australia retaliated with tariffs on US pharmaceuticals, it would likely harm access to innovative drugs and lead to increased negotiation restrictions.

While the trade negotiations’ outcome remains uncertain, it is unlikely the US can significantly influence Australian pharmaceutical pricing, especially with anticipated reductions in consumer drug costs.

Continue Reading

News

Trump orders Department of Education to close permanently

Trump signs executive order to dismantle Department of Education, triggering concerns over impact on American education system.

Published

on

Trump signs executive order to dismantle Department of Education, triggering concerns over impact on American education system.

In Short

President Trump has signed an executive order to start closing the Department of Education, stating education should be managed at the state level.

The decision has raised concerns among education advocates about the potential negative impact on federal education programs and student access.

President Trump signed an executive order on Thursday to begin the process of closing the Department of Education.

This move aligns with his ongoing campaign promise, although specific details were not provided at the signing ceremony.

The order follows a recent announcement from the department about plans to reduce its workforce significantly, raising concerns about the future of numerous federal education programs.

During the signing ceremony, Trump stated that education should be managed at the state level. He assured that critical funding for low-income schools, special needs students, and Pell Grants would be maintained and redistributed to other agencies.

Trump explained the urgency of dismantling the department, asserting that it is not beneficial to the American education system.

In response to this decision, education advocates expressed strong concerns, warning that abolishing the department could disrupt the education system and negatively affect students.

They argue that without federal oversight, college access could decline, student loan defaults could rise, and unscrupulous institutions could exploit students.

Continue Reading

News

Inside Trump and Putin hold 90-minute call on Ukraine

Published

on

Leaders agree to Middle East negotiations and energy infrastructure ceasefire.

A pivotal 90-minute conversation between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin could mark a crucial step toward ending the war in Ukraine.

The White House confirmed that the two leaders agreed to begin immediate negotiations in the Middle East and implement a ceasefire on energy infrastructure.

Trump described the discussion as “very good and productive,” noting that both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are eager to see the conflict come to an end.

“Many elements of a Contract for Peace were discussed,” Trump said on Truth Social, adding that the process to end the war is now “in full force and effect.”

As part of the talks, Putin reportedly agreed to a mutual 30-day pause on strikes targeting energy facilities and ordered Russian forces to comply.

In a further sign of potential de-escalation, Moscow has pledged to return 23 seriously wounded Ukrainian soldiers to Kyiv as a goodwill gesture.

While Trump remains optimistic about progress, he acknowledged that “many elements of a Final Agreement” still need to be resolved.

As diplomatic efforts intensify, global attention is now focused on whether negotiations in the Middle East can pave the way for a lasting ceasefire and eventual peace deal.

Ira Chaleff, a political commentator, bi-partisan leader in Congress, and author, “How To Stop a Tyrant: The Power of Political Followers to Make or BRAKE a Toxic Leader” joins Veronica Dudo to discuss.

Continue Reading

Trending Now