Connect with us

Ticker Views

Are there double standards when men are the victims of domestic abuse? | ticker VIEWS

Published

on

As the Hollywood trial between Johnny Depp and ex-wife Amber Heard continues, the evidence so far is suggesting Depp is a victim of domestic abuse

The trial between Johnny Depp and ex-wife Amber Heard is dominating Hollywood.

In case you’ve missed it, Depp is suing his ex-wife over an op-ed she wrote where she is describing herself as a victim of domestic abuse. She has filed a counterclaim for $100 million.

Numerous witnesses have taken to the stand to reveal shocking details of the couple’s turbulent relationship.

Most recently, an employee of Depp’s security team, Travis McGivern revealed Heard punched and spat at Depp.

McGivern was a nine-year veteran of Depp’s security and says he witnessed Heard throw a Red Bull can at Depp. 

“The initial look on his face kind of mirrored mine, kind of a look of shock,”.

“My job is ensure the safety and wellbeing of my clients, and I felt like I hadn’t done that,”

“[Depp] had a nice little shiner”

Travis McGivern
Sierra Gillespie, law crime network

During the trial in the Virginia Court, numerous witnesses have testified that Depp was the victim of consistent abuse from Heard, with many witnessing it first hand.

Serveral audio pieces were played of Heard taumenting Depp and verbally abusing him. The audio also proved Heard admitting to hitting Depp.

“I’m sorry that I didn’t hit you across the face in a proper slap…I was hitting you, I was not punching you.”

amber heard audio tape

Evidence was also shown of Depp’s sliced finger, after a bottle was thrown at him by Heard.

Psychologist Shannon Curry on Depp’s team also came the conclusion after an examintation that Heard suffers from two personality disorders that make it likely for her to be abusive.

“Miss Heard’s evaluation supported two diagnoses: Borderline Personality Disorder and Histrionic Personality Disorder, which seems to be a predictive factor for women who implement violence against their partner.” 

shannon curry, psychologist

While, Amber Heard is yet to take the stand and the trial is not over, so far the evidence suggests Depp was the victim of domestic abuse.

Double standards?

While there are still weeks to go, many witnesses to still testify, so far the evidence suggests that Depp was a victim of abuse.

Estimates show around one in four women and one in nine men are the victims of domestic or family violence.

Heard submitted a photo of her alleged bruised face to the court, but her doctor Erin Falatai isn’t confident it was abuse from Depp.

“I’m not an expert… I mean there’s color on her face in different areas, I don’t know what’s what.”

Heard’s nurse, Erin Falatai

When Heard wrote the op-ed that claimed she was a victim of domestic abuse, it severely impacted Depp’s reputation and acting career.

He lost millions after losing his contract with the Pirates Of The Caribbean 6 because of the allegations. He lost his reputation, with people quick to cancel him, based on allegations that might not even be true?

While, Depp should rightly lose acting gigs if he abused Heard in anyway, shouldn’t it be the same for Heard, given the evidence that she abused Depp?

Hollywood soap opera

The trial is being viewed as a Hollywood Soap Opera, with millions tuning in to watch. It’s being viewed on the front lines of TikTok and other social media platforms, like never before.

Over three million people have now signed a petition to have Heard dropped from Aquaman 2, following allegations of her abuse against Depp.

Some are saying it would be double standards if Heard isn’t dropped. It also begs the question are men treated differently as victims of domestic abuse?

Regardless of who’s at fault here, abuse allegations of any kind should be taken seriously.

Regardless of whether these allegations are true or false, there are people across the world who are suffering from domestic abuse, whether its male or female. So this is a very important case even though its getting alot of attention based on the glitz and glamour of Hollywood’s elite.”

Sierra Gillespie, law crime network
Sierra Gillespie, law crime network

The #MeToo movement has created a myriad of positive outlets for victims of assault, but, does that mean every allegation of abuse from a woman is true?

These are all valid questions coming to light as the Depp Vs Heard trial continues.

Holly is an anchor and reporter at Ticker. She's experienced in live reporting, and has previously covered the Covid-19 pandemic on-location. She's passionate about telling stories in business, climate and health.

Climate Change

Australia set to bid for COP29, despite lack of climate action

Published

on

Australia is set to bid for the opportunity to host the COP29 climate conference, despite its lack of climate action recently

Australia’s opposition Labor party says it will bid to host the 2024 COP29 climate conference if they win the upcoming Federal Election.

They say it will be in partnership with the Pacific and Soloman Island Nations ‘if they want to.’

Australia has never hosted a United Nations climate conference but it could set them on the global stage as a leader in climate change action. 

However, Australia has been dubbed a laggard on its climate change action and may not be equipped to host such a significant event.

 

“This is a real shift in Australia’s policy…For 30 years in the history of the United Nations Climate negotiations Australia hasn’t hosted a meeting… Instead it usually shys away from them”

richie merzian, the australia institute
Richie merzian, australia institute

Australia’s rocky relationship with the Solomon Islands will make the deal even more uncertain.

A recent security pact between China and the Solomon Islands has been finalised, meaning China will build a military base just Kilometres from Australia’s borders.

Australia has recently cristicised the Solomon Islands for its friendly ties to China and how that will negatively impact Australia’s national security.

Now the biggest question is do the Pacific, and the Solomon Islands, even want to partner with Australia at COP29?

“It’s a real opportunity for Australia to gear up it’s diplomacy, to demonstrate leadership of the global stage and hopefully shake of its reputation as a laggard on climate action”

richie merzian, the australia institute
richie merzian, the australia institute

Deadly heatwave

Climate change has reared its head more frequently over recent years, including wildfires, ravaging floods, and extreme weather events.

This comes as millions of people in India and Pakistan experience a brutal heat wave that has left hundreds dead.

The high temperatures have been surfacing for the last two months, with the Government unprepared to handle it.

The heatwave is causing wide sweeping water shortages, heat stroke, and power outages.

The region has reached its highest April temperatures in 122 years.

Photo credit: New York Times

“Global warming means more extreme heatwaves, and longer heatwaves… It’s a sign of things to come.”

richie merzian, australia institute
richie merzian, australia institute

Continue Reading

Ticker Views

Why it’s important to keep Putin weak and humiliated

Published

on

Three months in and Russia has intensified its offensive in the eastern part of the nation, but its gains have been slow

America’s Defence Intelligence Agency head also says between eight and 10 Russian generals have been killed as a result of the combat.

But all Moscow has gained is a small piece of Ukrainian territory in the east.

Vladimir Putin remained tight-lipped about any plans to escalate the war during his Victory Day speech.

Some fear that Putin’s invasion of Ukraine didn’t live up to his expectations, which could force him to resort to desperate measures.

However, Ticker News spoke with Eastern Europe expert Sergej Sumlenny who says it’s important to keep Putin weak and humiliated.

How does this war end?

Sumlenny says there’s no “good exit” in sight while Putin remains in power.

“He has not entered into this war to believe he’ll finish Ukraine in one to three days, or one week top,” he says.

The Eastern European expert says the Russian army has already suffered double as much losses as the Soviet Army within 10 years in Afghanistan.

“The Russian army could not achieve any significant victory. Russian President Putin on the ninth of May on Victory Day in Russia could not present any victory. And that was a huge revelation for him and he understands it,

“So I don’t see any exit strategy for him. He clearly tries to push further without any success. Like Russia delivers war criminals to The Hague, the International Criminal Court pulls out its army out of Ukraine and establish over 300 kilometre demilitarised zone on Russian territory working into Ukraine. That would be a great end,” Sumlenny proposed.

However, he acknowledges an end could take months.

“As long as this will not be provided, Ukrainian army will continue to fight back, destroying Russian military equipment killing Russian soldiers unfortunately for Russia, until Ukrainians will push Russians out of their country, it can take months, but it will be inevitable.”

Putin is dangerous, with power or without power

The West holds talks to Putin during eight years of his war on Ukraine.

The West Hall talks to Putin after he has attacked Georgia in 2000, after he annexed Crimea in 2014, after he guessed a Syria, like since 2012, and further, and it didn’t help.

Russia was invited to every international international ground like conventional platform like g20 but Russia conceals everything. And it didn’t help.

According to Sumlenny, when Putin feels to be strong, he strikes and he kills.

“He felt very strong in February this year. That’s why he attacked Ukraine, he felt desperate or threatened by all sides. And that’s not true. But he felt very strong. That’s why he attacked, so now he feels weak,” he says.

“Of course, he’s dangerous like any dictator, but it’s better to have in him desperate and weak than strong and aggressive.”

Continue Reading

Ticker Views

Senate set to kill abortion rights this week

Published

on

The aftershocks of the earthquake triggered in Washington last week, with the explosive leak of the first draft of an opinion authored by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, and backed in by four other Justices, including the three radical conservatives appointed by former president Donald Trump, continue to shake the foundations of the capital and the landscape across the country

USSC Bruce Wolpe joins U.S correspondent Veronica Dudo, and ticker’s Holly Stearnes join a panel on U.S. abortion rights

The magnitude of the impact of the draft opinion is simply enormous. 

What has been accepted by well over 60% of the American people as a constitutional right – the ability of women to have access to abortion services – is about to be removed. 

There is no good that comes from going down that road of taking rights away from people. In 1856, in the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court held that former slaves did not have standing in federal courts because they lacked U.S. citizenship, even after they were freed.

PROTESTORS IN U.S.

That decision, so outrageous, contributed to the Civil War.  In 1954, in Brown v Board of Education, the Court ruled that segregated “separate but equal” schools for Black students recognised by the Supreme Court 50 years earlier was unconstitutional as this did not afford equal protection under law – a right guaranteed by the 14th Amendment enacted after President Lincoln and the North won the civil war and ended slavery. 

The arc of justice in other words, is best when the law advances rights – not takes them away.

33 million American women between the ages of 15 and 44 living in over two dozen states across the country will be denied access to abortion services if this draft opinion is ultimately adopted. 

But nothing in the Constitution prevents Congress from enacting a law to legally establish and protect a woman’s right to have access to abortion services. 

U.S WOMAN PROTESTS

This is the basis of the Women’s Health Protection Act which passed the House last September. 

The Democratic leadership of the House recognised that what everyone is facing this week was coming, and that the best protection against overturning the precedent of Roe v Wade is through legislation. 

The bill provides that, “Congress finds abortion services are essential to health care. A health care provider has a statutory right under this Act to provide abortion services.”

This is the bill that the Democratic leadership will bring to the Senate this week.  It will fail.

No Republicans in the House voted for this bill, which passed on a party-line vote of 218-211.  There are only two Republicans in the Senate– both women, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska – who support abortion rights.

All but one or two of the 50 Democrats will support it. Bu the Senate is not a democratic institution.  A simple majority vote is insufficient to pass legislation. 

WASHINGTON, DC – APRIL 21: Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell

A bill needs a supermajority of 60 votes to pass the Senate.  That is completely out of reach today for abortion rights.

The Senate could change its rules and allow the abortion rights bill to pass in this one instance by a simple majority.  But that will not happen either.

At least two Democrats oppose upending this Senate tradition, and no Republican will vote against their leadership to alter the Senate to pass a Democratic bill on abortion.

This ugly hyper-partisanship will have several ramifications. 

If this Senate cannot protect these rights, perhaps more Democrats in the Senate can.   Democrats will use this vote to target Senate seats held by Republicans that are up in the November midterm elections in states like Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Wisconsin. 

This could well energise not only Democrats but also key swing independent voters who do support, in significant numbers, abortion rights.

But the human impact on women is frightening. 

The journalist who obtained the draft opinion in the leak from the Supreme Court, and broke the story, Josh Gerstein of Politico, said this last Friday:

“And if Justice Alito’s draft opinion that we reported and made public on Monday becomes the Supreme Court’s final word on this issue, you’d have really a situation of abortion haves and have-nots across the country, where you would have many states where abortion was relatively available and probably about 26 states where abortion is banned or very, very sharply restricted. You would then have women trying to get medication abortions in those states or possibly travel through what might develop as a kind of Underground Railroad to get them out of those states and into other states where they could get legal abortions. It would be a pretty dramatic change in the availability of abortion across the country.”

Gerstein is right. This is the world we are in. 

WOMEN ACROSS THE U.S RALLY IN PROTEST

160 years after the Civil War, another Underground Railroad – this time to take women away from states with restrictive medical laws. 

A Handmaid’s Tale come to life, as Canada pledges to open its borders to American women seeking reproductive health services.

Engraved on the pediment of the Supreme Court building in Washington are the words, “Equal Justice Under Law.”

The Supreme Court’s imminent decision and the failure of Congress to enact legislation to overturn it betrays a US political system failing to protect all women equally under law.

Continue Reading

Trending on Ticker

Copyright © 2022 The Ticker Company PTY LTD