Climate activists and industry stakeholders are engaged in a heated debate over the environmental credentials of hybrid vehicles as these cars continue to gain traction among consumers.

Hybrids, which combine gasoline engines with battery power, have surged in popularity due to their superior fuel efficiency compared to traditional gasoline-powered vehicles.

Proponents argue that hybrids represent a significant step towards carbon neutrality and tout them as a vital solution in the fight against climate change.

However, skeptics, including activists and some regulators, contend that hybrids fall short of meeting ambitious carbon-reduction targets and are not a sufficiently green alternative.

Read more – Amazon backflips on return to work

Aaron Regunberg, senior policy counsel at consumer group Public Citizen, criticizes the marketing of hybrids as environmentally friendly, stating that it is “just misleading” to promote more gasoline-powered cars on the roads as beneficial for the climate.

Increased gas investment

The market’s shift towards hybrids has led to substantial profits for automakers like Toyota and prompted increased investment in gasoline-electric technology. Yet, this growth has also sparked scrutiny from consumer groups.

Public Citizen filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission against Toyota, alleging that the company’s branding of hybrids as “hybrid EVs” and other marketing phrases mislead consumers.

Toyota North America defends its marketing practices, asserting that they adhere to industry standards.

The marketing debate comes as the Environmental Protection Agency prepares to announce new emission standards, which would require significant reductions in fleet emissions by 2032.

Automakers, represented by groups such as Toyota, Honda, and Ford, are lobbying against the proposed rules, arguing that the stringent requirements would necessitate an overly rapid transition away from hybrids and result in higher costs for consumers.