Heathrow Airport should have stayed operational post-fire, but faced extensive disruptions and criticism over crisis management and power dependency.
In Short
Heathrow Airport could have stayed open despite a nearby electrical substation fire that caused 1,300 flight cancellations. Both Heathrow and the UK government have launched investigations, while airline stocks fell due to concerns over financial impacts.
Heathrow Airport may have remained open on Friday despite a fire at a nearby electrical substation, according to Britain’s National Grid.
The London airport had previously closed due to the fire affecting its power supply. National Grid’s CEO, John Pettigrew, stated that although one substation was damaged, two others provided sufficient power to ensure operations could continue.
Heathrow officials, however, argued that a safe restart of operations was not feasible after such a major disruption. They emphasised the complexity of the airport’s systems, which required careful management during the downtime.
Alternative options
Heathrow’s CEO, Thomas Woldbye, highlighted that while alternative substations existed, switching them on was time-consuming. He pointed out that the fire occurred outside of Heathrow’s control and required significant response efforts from the airport.
An internal investigation has been initiated by Heathrow, with the UK government also planning a separate inquiry into the incident. The disruption caused around 1,300 flight cancellations or diversions, leading to substantial financial implications for airlines.
In the aftermath, airline stocks faced a decline in value, reflecting investor concerns about the incident’s impact on travel and revenue. The International Air Transport Association criticized Heathrow’s emergency response, questioning the airport’s reliance on a single power source.
