Connect with us
https://tickernews.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AmEx-Thought-Leaders.jpg

Money

Defending the Territory – Can Darwin be the AFL’s 20th Club?

Published

on

When the Tassie Devils join the AFL, in 2028, as the 19th team, Darwin will be the only capital city in Australia without an AFL or NRL team. Will the AFL go in and defend their territory which it failed to do in Canberra all those years ago?

The Footy Case for the Northern Territory

The case for a NT team in the AFL – to be called the Darwin Dingoes or Darwin Crocsis considered a romantic notion in some ways, but the footy case is strong. The Territory has produced rich reservoirs of football talent from Alice Springs to the Arafura Sea. Playing talent like Michael Long, the Rioli family, Andrew McLeod and Nathan Buckley roll off the tongue of any Aussie Rules diehard, and many Territory (often Indigenous) players become famous in the state leagues of SA and WA as well as the AFL. Many play in the Northern Territory Football League (NTFL) before heading down south in what is the ‘off season’ for the Top End.

In fact, according to James Coventry’s neat little book, Footballistics (2018), the NT is truly Aussie Rules heartland in terms of participation and talent. In terms of ‘footy readiness’, according to Coventry, the NT often comes top in terms of participation rates.

For a small population of just over 240,000 people, over 13 percent of Territorians participate in AFL programmes, compared to 8 per cent in WA, 6 per cent in SA and 2 per cent in Victoria. NT is top in terms of adult participation and top four in terms of children’s participation. In fact, in non-metropolitan areas, Coventry found there were 22,000 registered participants (in 2018), which means every child outside Darwin and Alice Springs plays footy—not allowing for the many unregistered participants who are also playing. In 2022, this had grown to around 40,000 participants. And in terms of talent, the NT produces 56 elite AFL players per million people, with only Victoria and SA ahead.

And in the NT, they simply love footy. Just watching the finals from the Tiwi Islands or Central Australia will tell you that! It also shows up statistically, with almost half the population favouring the AFL column in terms of Google searches—ranking it with the traditional Aussie Rules states Tasmania, SA, Victoria and WA.

AFL Club Taskforce – The Strategic Business Case

The NT AFL Club Taskforce, in their Strategic Business Case for the 20th licence, has examined a number of options. These include more AFL matches in Darwin and Alice Springs, a relocated team, or a Darwin-based stand-alone Northern Territory team that also plays in Alice. They even consider a Northern Australia team (Darwin-based but also playing in Cairns in Far North Queensland), although it may be better to have the Queensland teams—Brisbane Lions and Gold Coast Suns—develop Far North Queensland, Central Queensland and the Sunshine Coast, and let the NT team focus on Darwin and Alice Springs. Hawthorn is also considering playing a few games in Cairns.

The Economic Challenge

Of course, that’s the footy case. It seems an open and shut case. But the economic case for the NT is much harder—especially given climate, population and financial considerations if the NT team requires a new stadium or upgrades to TIO Stadium in Marrara, Darwin and TIO Traeger Park Oval in Alice Springs.

As experience shows with NT teams, even the basketball team the Darwin Crocs struggled.
ABC News: NT Sports Club Struggles

Even with a significant AFL contribution of $7.83 million per year, the Taskforce forecasted that the NT AFL Club would need Federal and NT Government to fund an operational funding gap of $18.89 million per annum. This would include a new or upgraded stadium, with AFL NT chairman Sean Bowden explaining that:

The Stadium will anchor the opportunity to bid for a 20th licence in the AFL should that opportunity arise.”

However, the Taskforce noted:

The economic benefit to the NT could be as much as $559 million if the new club was provided with a new stadium. The Strategic Business Case indicates that an AFL Team would create 160 full-time jobs, bring game day activation of the economy and add $116M a year in economic output to the Territory economy.”

AFL NT makes its case

Social Impacts and National Significance

Hand in hand with the economic benefits come the social impacts. The NT has a serious problem with diabetes and associated health problems, low educational attainment and imprisonment. The Taskforce would develop pathways for participation—not only for elite footballers in an AFL and AFLW team—but also create a social safety net of social programs for all Territorians under the umbrella of the NT AFL team. Social cohesion is important for internal security in the same way as defence is important for external security.

In some ways, the NT team might be considered a national security (internal social cohesion) project. In the same way as the PNG team in the National Rugby League (NRL) is getting support from the Commonwealth Government for geo-political reasons (external security) to the tune of $600 million as part of a $750 million ambitious investment by the NRL:

An AFL team in Darwin might be considered in the same way. Darwin was the only capital city bombed in wartime in 1942. It is considered vital to our defence strategy, and the new tensions in global geo-politics will see a review of our defence assets and arrangements. For instance, the lease of the Port of Darwin to a Chinese Government-linked company would never have happened in today’s global climate.

So just like having an NRL team in PNG, the Commonwealth might consider having an AFL team in Darwin as important to national security.

And as many seasoned commentators (hello Ross Gittins) always say—what do you do when economists question a project? Put it in the defence budget under ‘national security’. It may be a stretch to consider it part of defence, although the AFL might like this, as it would allow them to ‘defend their territory’ and keep the NT a predominantly Aussie Rules zone.

Completing the National Jigsaw

And there’s no doubt that the Aussie Rules footy community would love it. As the legendary AFL commentator Bruce McAvaney once said, the NT would “complete the jigsaw” in the national competition of Australia’s truly indigenous home-grown game.
McAvaney’s View on the 20th Team

There’s that romance coming up again. Australia’s only indigenous game—with AFL teams from Tasmania to the Top End, and from the East Coast to the West Coast in every Australian capital city. It might be just too much for the AFL, as custodians of the great Australian game, to resist.


*Professor Tim Harcourt is Industry Professor and Chief Economist at the Centre for Sport, Business and Society (CSBS), University of Technology Sydney, and author of Footynomics and the Business of Sport.

Continue Reading

Money

ANZ job cuts spark banking clash

ANZ plans to cut 3,500 jobs, sparking debate on the future of Australia’s banking sector and employment dynamics.

Published

on

ANZ plans to cut 3,500 jobs, sparking debate on the future of Australia’s banking sector and employment dynamics.


ANZ has announced plans to cut 3,500 staff and 1,000 contractors over the next year, triggering a fierce debate between business leaders, unions, and government about the future of Australia’s banking sector.

The decision raises wider questions about the resilience of the business community and the role of politics, productivity, and technology in shaping employment.

#ANZ #Banking #Jobs #Unions #Australia #Economy #TickerNews


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Money

1 in 8 households don’t have the money to buy enough food

Published

on

Katherine Kent, University of Wollongong

Around one in eight (1.3 million) Australian households experienced food insecurity in 2023. This means they didn’t always have enough money to buy the amount or quality of food they needed for an active and healthy life.

The data, released on Friday by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), show food insecurity is now a mainstream public health and equity challenge.

When funds are tight, food budgets suffer

The main driver of food insecurity in Australia is financial pressure.

Housing costs and energy bills expenses consume much of household income, leaving food as the most flexible part of the budget.

When money runs short, families cut back on groceries, buy cheaper but less nutritious food, skip meals, or rely on food charities.

These strategies come at the expense of nutrition, health and wellbeing.

Inflation has added further pressure. The cost of food has risen substantially over the past two years, with groceries for a family of four costing around $1,000 per fortnight.

Who is most affected?

Not all households are affected equally. Single parents face the highest rates of food insecurity, with one in three (34%) struggling to afford enough food.

Families with children are more vulnerable (16%) than those without (8%).

Group households, often made up of students or young workers, are also heavily affected at 28%.

Rates are even higher for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander households, where 41% report food insecurity.

Income remains a defining factor. Nearly one in four (23.2% of) households in the lowest income bracket experience food insecurity, compared with just 3.6% in the highest.

These headline numbers are only part of the story. Past research shows higher risks of food insecurity for some other groups:

While the ABS survey can not provide local breakdowns, it will also be important to know which states and territories have higher rates of food insecurity, to better inform state-level responses.

What are the impacts?

Food insecurity is both a symptom and a cause of poor health.

It leads to poorer quality diets, as households cut back on fruit, vegetables and protein-rich foods that spoil quickly. Instead, they may rely on processed items that are cheaper, more filling and keep for longer.

The ongoing stress of worrying about not having enough food takes a toll on mental health and increases social isolation.

Together these pressures increase the risk of chronic diseases including diabetes, heart disease and some cancers.

For children, not having enough food affects concentration, learning and long-term development.

Breaking this cycle means recognising that improving health depends on improving food security. Left unaddressed, food insecurity deepens existing inequalities across generations.

What can we do about it?

We already know the solutions to food insecurity and they are evidence-based.

Strengthening income support by increasing the amount of JobSeeker and other government payments is crucial. This would ensure households have enough money to cover food alongside other essentials.

Investment in universal school meals, such as free lunch programs, can guarantee children at least one nutritious meal a day.

Policies that make healthy food more affordable and available in disadvantaged areas are also important, whether through subsidies, price regulation, or support for local retailers.

Community-based approaches, such as food co-operatives where members share bulk-buying power and social supermarkets that sell donated or surplus food at low cost can help people buy cheaper food. However, they cannot be a substitute for systemic reform.

Finally, ongoing monitoring of food insecurity must be embedded in national health and social policy frameworks so we can track progress over time. The last ABS data on food insecurity was collected ten years ago, and we cannot wait another decade to understand how Australians are faring.

The National Food Security Strategy is being developed by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry with guidance from a new National Food Council. It provides an opportunity to align these actions, set measurable targets and ensure food security is addressed at a national scale.

Food insecurity is widespread and shaped by disadvantage, with serious health consequences. The question is no longer whether food insecurity exists, but whether Australia will act on the solutions.The Conversation

Katherine Kent, Senior Lecturer in Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Wollongong

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Money

Inflation data impacts markets as stocks reach highs

Inflation data and tariff uncertainty loom as U.S. stocks near record highs ahead of potential Federal Reserve rate cuts

Published

on

Inflation data and tariff uncertainty loom as U.S. stocks near record highs ahead of potential Federal Reserve rate cuts

video
play-sharp-fill
In Short:
– U.S. stock investors face crucial inflation data amidst concerns over tariffs and bond yields.
– The Federal Reserve is expected to lower interest rates following weaker job growth and trade uncertainties.
U.S. stock investors are facing a week filled with critical inflation data.
Uncertainty over tariffs and government bond yields complicates the market landscape. Despite a record high for the S&P 500 index, the recent monthly employment report revealed weaker job growth in August, prompting concerns.Banner

Investor focus turns to the upcoming U.S. consumer price index data, with implications for potential interest rate cuts.

The Federal Reserve is widely expected to reduce rates at its upcoming meeting.

Market Risks

Concerns linger around tariffs, especially after a court ruling deemed many of President Trump’s tariffs illegal.

This has muddied the decision-making for corporations and investors. Higher long-dated U.S. government debt yields, which reached 5% for the first time in over a month, have also contributed to stock market challenges.

Despite a substantial 10% rise in the S&P 500 this year, traders remain cautious as economic releases could disrupt elevated stock valuations amidst ongoing trade uncertainties.


Download the Ticker app

Continue Reading

Trending Now